Conversation, Gaze coordination, and beliefs about visual context

Cognitive Science

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1468-1482

  Richardson, Daniel C ^a   Dale, Rick ^b   Tomlinson, John M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Common ground; Discourse; Eye movements; Gaze coordination

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950758570     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01057.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Allen, K. (1984). The high rise terminal contour. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 4, 19-32.
2. Altmann, G.T.M. (2004). Language-mediated eye movements in the absence of a visual world: The "blank screen paradigm." Cognition, 93, B79-B87.
3. Apperly, I.A., Back, E., Samson, D., & France, L. (2007). The cost of thinking about false beliefs: Evidence from adult performance on a non-inferential theory of mind task. Cognition, 106, 1093-1108.
4. Apperly, A., Riggs, K.J., Simpson, A., Chiavarino, C., & Samson, D. (2006). Is belief reasoning automatic? Psychological Science, 17, 841-844.
5. Baldwin, D.A. (1995). Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In C. Moore & P.J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 131-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Bard, E.G., Anderson, A.H., Sotillo, C., Aylett, M., Doherty-Sneddon, F., & Newlands, A. (2000). Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 1-22.
7. Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., & Cleland, A.A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), 13-25.
8. Brennan, S.E. (2005). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In J.C. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as product and language-action traditions (pp. 95-129). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Bromme, R., Jucks, R., & Runde, A. (2005). Barriers and biases in computer-mediated expert-layperson communication: An overview and insights into the field of medical advice. In R. Bromme, H. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication-and how they maybe overcome (pp. 89-118). New York: Springer.
10. Brown, M.P., & Dell, G.S. (1987). Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention of instruments. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 441-472.
11. Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2008). Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition, 107(3), 1122-1134.
12. Brown-Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2008). Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science, 32(4), 643-684.
13. Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Clark, H.H., & Brennan, S.E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: APA.
15. Clark, H.H., & Marshall, C.R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A.K. Joshi, I. Webber, & I. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Condon, W., & Ogston, W. (1971). Speech and body motion synchrony of the speaker-hearer. In D. Horton & J. Jenkins (Eds.), The perception of language (pp. 150-184). New York: Academic Press.
17. Dale, R., & Spivey, M.J. (2006). Unraveling the dyad: Using recurrence analysis to explore patterns of syntactic coordination between children and caregivers in conversation. Language Learning, 56(3), 391-430.
18. Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327-339.
19. Fletcher, J., Stirling, L., Mushkin, I., & Wales, R. (2002). Intonational rises and dialog acts in the austrialian english map task. Language and Speech, 45(3), 229-252.
20. Fussell, S.R., & Krauss, R.M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 378-391.
21. Galantucci, B., & Sebanz, N. (2009). Joint action: Current perspectives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 255-259.
22. Garrod, S., & Pickering, M.J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 8-11.
23. Gerwing, J., & Bavelas, J.B. (2004). Linguistic influences on gesture's form. Gesture, 4, 157-195.
24. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D.G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650-669.
25. Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1992). Accommodation theory: Communication, context and consequences. In J. Coupland & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation (pp. 1-68). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Griffin, Z.M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11(4), 274-279.
27. Hanna, J.E., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2004). Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science, 28(1), 105-115.
28. Hanna, J.E., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Trueswell, J.C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory & Language, 49(1), 43-61.
29. Haywood, S.L., Pickering, M.J., & Branigan, H.P. (2005). Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue? Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society/APS, 16(5), 362-366.
30. Holler, J., & Stevens, R. (2007). The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(1), 4.
31. Hoover, M.A., & Richardson, D.C. (2008). When facts go down the rabbit hole: Contrasting features and objecthood as indexes to memory. Cognition, 108(2), 533-542.
32. Horton, W.S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59(1), 91-117.
33. Isaacs, E.A., & Clark, H.H. (1987). References in conversations between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26-37.
34. Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe. Cognition, 109(2), 224-234.
35. Keysar, B. (1997). Unconfounding common ground. Discourse Processes, 24, 254-270.
36. Keysar, B. (2007). Communication and miscommunication: The role of egocentric processes. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(1), 71-84.
37. Keysar, B., Barr, D.J., Balin, J.A., & Brauner, J.S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11(1), 32-38.
38. Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M.W. (2006). The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 481-529.
39. Kraljic, T., & Brennan, S.E. (2005). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? Cognitive Psychology, 50(2), 194-231.
40. Lockridge, C.B., & Brennan, S.E. (2002). Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 550-557.
41. Metzing, C., & Brennan, S.E. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory & Language, 49(2), 201-213.
42. Meyer, A.S., Sleiderink, A.M., & Levelt, W.J.M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66(2), B25-B33.
43. Mitchell, P., Robinson, E.J., Isaacs, J.E., & Nye, R.M. (1996). Contamination in reasoning about false belief: An instance of realist bias in adults but not children. Cognition, 59, 1-21.
44. Nadig, A.S., & Sedivy, J.C. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13(4), 329-336.
45. Nickerson, R.S. (1999). How we know-and sometimes misjudge-what others know: Imputing one's own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 737-759.
46. Pickering, M.J., & Garrod, S. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment and dialogue. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 292-304.
47. Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P.R. Cohen, J.L. Morgen, & M.E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271-310). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
48. Richardson, D.C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29(6), 1045-1060.
49. Richardson, D.C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N.Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society/APS, 18(5), 407-413.
50. Richardson, D.C., Hoover, M.A., & Ghane, A. (2008). Joint perception: Gaze and the presence of others. In B.C. Love, K. McRae, & V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirtieth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 309-314). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
51. Richardson, D.C., & Kirkham, N.Z. (2004). Multimodal events and moving locations: Eye movements of adults and 6-month-olds reveal dynamic spatial indexing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 46-62.
52. Richardson, D.C., & Matlock, T. (2007). The integration of figurative language and static depictions: An eye movement study of fictive motion. Cognition, 102(1), 129-138.
53. Richardson, D.C., & Spivey, M.J. (2000). Representation, space and Hollywood squares: Looking at things that aren't there anymore. Cognition, 76, 269-295.
54. Schegloff, E.A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of "uh huh" and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Georgetown University roundtable on languages and linguistics (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
55. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70-76.
56. Shockley, K., Richardson, D.C., & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 305-319.
57. Shockley, K., Santana, M.V., & Fowler, C.A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 326-332.
58. Spivey, M.J., & Geng, J.J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 65(4), 235-241.
59. Spivey, M.J., & Richardson, D.C. (2008). Language embedded in the environment. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 382-400). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60. Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey Knowlton, M.J., Eberhard, K.M., & Sedivy, J.C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632-1634.
61. Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Social projection of transient drive states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1159-1168.
62. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103-128.
63. Wu, S., & Keysar, B. (2007). The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society/APS, 18(7), 600-606.
64. Zbilut, J.P., Giuliani, A., & Webber, C.L.J. (1998). Detecting deterministic signals in exceptionally noisy environments using cross-recurrence quantification. Physics Letters, 246, 122-128.