Designing continuous sonic interaction

International Journal of Design

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 13-25

  Rocchesso, Davide ^a   Polotti, Pietro ^b,c   Monache, Stefano Delle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY IUAV OF VENICE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^c Conservatory of Music G ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

Basic interaction design; Continuous interaction; Sound

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950745419     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Accot, J., & Zhai, S. (1997). Beyond Fitts' law: Models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (pp. 295-302). New York: ACM.
2. Albers, J. (2006). Interaction of color. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1963)
3. Anceschi, G. (2006). Basic design, fondamenta del design [Basic design, foundations of design]. In G. Anceschi, M. Botta, & M. A. Garito (Eds.), L'ambiente dell'apprendimento-Web design e processi cognitivi [Learning environment-Web design and cognitive processes] (pp. 57-67). Milano, Italy: McGraw Hill.
4. Arrighi, R., Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2006). Perceptual synchrony of audio-visual streams for natural and artificial motion sequences. Journal of Vision, 6(3), 260-268.
5. Aschersleben, G. (2002). Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain and Cognition, 48(1), 66-79.
6. Avanzini, F., & Rocchesso, D. (2004). Physical modeling of impacts: Theory and experiments on contact time and spectral centroid. In Proceedings of the Conference on Sound and Music Computing (pp. 287-293). Retrieved May 15, 2009, from http://recherche.ircam.fr/equipes/repmus/SMC04/scm04actes/P46.pdf
7. Avanzini, F., Serafin, S., & Rocchesso, D. (2005). Interactive simulation of rigid body interaction with friction-induced sound generation. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 13(5), 1073-1081.
8. Bartók, B. (1992). Mechanical music. In B. Suchoff (Ed.), Belá Bartók-Essays (pp. 289-300). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1937)
9. Böhner, K., De Paula, R., Dourish, P., & Sengers, P. (2005). Affect: From information to interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing (pp. 59-68). New York: ACM.
10. Bootsma, R., Fernandez, L., & Mottet, D. (2004). Behind Fitts' law: Kinematic patterns in goal-directed movements. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(6), 811-821.
11. Bozzi, P. (1978). L'interosservazione come metodo per la fenomenologia sperimentale [Inter-observation as a method for experimental phenomenology]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia [Italian Journal of Psychology], 5, 229-239.
12. Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
13. Buxton, W. (2005). Experience design vs. interface design. Rotman Magazine, Winter, 47-49.
14. Dahl, S. (2005). On the beat: Human movement and timing in the production and perception of music. Unpublished doctoral thesis, KTH School of Computer Science and Communication, Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:11296
15. Delle Monache, S., Polotti, P., Papetti, S., & Rocchesso, D. (2007). Gamelunch: A physics-based sonic dining table. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp. 41-44). San Francisco: Computer Music Association.
16. Delle Monache, S., Polotti, P., Papetti, S., & Rocchesso, D. (2008). Sonically augmented found objects. In Proceedings of the Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 154-157). Genova, Italy.
17. Delle Monache, S., Devallez, D., Drioli, C., Fontana, F., Papetti, S., Polotti, P., & Rocchesso, D. (2009). Sound design toolkit-Users' guide. In Closing the loop of sound evaluation and design (Deliverable 2.3, pp. 1-62). Verona, Italy: University of Verona. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://closed.ircam.fr/uploads/media/CLOSED_D2.3.pdf
18. Demoucron, M. (2008). On the control of virtual violins-physical modelling and control of bowed string instruments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-9424
19. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Essl, G., & O'Modhrain, S. (2006). An enactive approach to the design of new tangible musical instruments. Organised Sound, 11(3), 285-296.
21. Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design Issues, 17(1), 5-17.
22. Franinovic, K. (2008). Basic interaction design for sonic artefacts in everyday contexts. In Focused - Current design research projects and methods (pp. 95-112). Bern, Switzerland: Swiss Design Network.
23. Franinovic, K. (2009). Toward basic interaction design. Elisava Temes de Disseny Journal. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://tdd.elisava.net/coleccion/25/franinovic-en
24. Gaver, W. W., Smith, R. B., & O'Shea, T. (1991). Effective sounds in complex systems: The arkola simulation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (pp. 85-90). New York: ACM.
25. Hallnäs, L., & Redström, J. (2002a). Abstract information appliances: Methodological exercises in conceptual design of computational things. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 105-116). New York: ACM.
26. Hallnäs, L., & Redström, J. (2002b). From use to presence: On the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 9(2), 106-124.
27. Handel, S. (2006). Perceptual coherence-Hearing and seeing. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Hodgkinson, T. (1996). Siberian shamanism and improvised music. Contemporary Music Review, 14(2), 59-66.
29. Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 234-241). New York: ACM.
30. Juslin, P., Friberg, A., & Bresin, R. (2002). Toward a computational model of expression in performance: The GERM model. Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue 2001/2002, 63-122.
31. th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3175-3180). New York: ACM.
32. Klöckl, K. (2008). Changing connections. The role of connections in products between traditional and new technologies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, IUAV University of Venice, Venice, Italy. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://rice.iuav.it/103/
33. Kranz, M., Schmidt, A., Maldonado, A., Rusu, R. B., Beetz, M., Hörnler, B., & Rigoll, G. (2007). Context-aware kitchen utilities. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 213-214). New York: ACM.
34. Lagarde, J., & Kelso, J. (2006). Binding of movement, sound and touch: Multimodal coordination dynamics. Experimental Brain Research, 173(4), 673-688.
35. Lantz, V., & Murray-Smith, R. (2004). Rhythmic interaction with a mobile device. In Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 97-100). New York: ACM.
36. Lim, Y. K., Stolterman, E., Jung, H., & Donaldson, J. (2007). Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp. 239-254). New York: ACM.
37. Löwgren, J. (2007a). Inspirational patterns for embodied interaction. Journal of Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 20(3), 165-177.
38. Löwgren, J. (2007b). Pliability as an experiential quality: Exploring the aesthetics of interaction design. Artifact, 1(2), 85-95.
39. Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. New York: MIT Press.
40. Ludden, G., & Schifferstein, H. (2007). Effects of visualauditory incongruity on product expression and surprise. International Journal of Design, 1(3), 29-39.
41. Lupton, E., & Phillips, J. C. (2008). Graphic design: The new basics. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
42. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books.
43. Norman, D. A. (2007). The design of future things. New York: Basic Books.
44. Petrini, K., Dahl, S., Rocchesso, D., Haakon Waadeland, C., Avanzini, F., Puce, A., & Pollick, F. E. (2009). Multisensory integration of drumming actions: Musical expertise affects perceived audiovisual asynchrony. Experimental Brain Research, 198(2-3), 339-352.
45. Polotti, P., Delle Monache, S., Papetti, S., & Rocchesso, D. (2008). Gamelunch: Forging a dining experience through sound. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Extended abstracts, pp. 2281-2286). New York: ACM.
46. Polotti, P., & Rocchesso, D. (Eds.). (2008). Sound to sense-Sense to sound: A state of the art in sound and music computing. Berlin: Logos.
47. Raskin, J. (2000). The human interface: New directions for designing interactive systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
48. Rath, M., & Rocchesso, D. (2005). Continuous sonic feedback from a rolling ball. IEEE MultiMedia, 12(2), 60-69.
49. Riccò, D. (2006). Basic design sinestesico. Fondamenti teorici [Synesthetic basic design. Theoretical foundations]. In G. Anceschi, M. Botta, & M. A. Garito (Eds.), L'ambiente dell'apprendimento-Web design e processi cognitive [Learning environment-Web design and cognitive processes] (pp. 97-110). Milano, Italy: McGraw Hill.
50. Rocchesso, D., & Serafin, S., (2009). Sonic interaction design [Editorial for the special issue on Sonic Interaction Design], International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(11), 905-906.
51. Schaal, S., Ijspeert, A., & Billard, A. (2003). Computational approaches to motor learning by imitation. Philosophical Transaction B, 358(1431), 537-547.
52. Schafer, M. (1994). Soundscape-Our sonic environment and the tuning of the world. Rochester, VT: Destiny Books.
53. Schelleng, J. C. (1973). The bowed string and the player. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53(1), 26-41.
54. Sennett, P. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55. Serafin, S. (2004). The sound of friction: Real-time models, playability and musical applications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://imi.aau.dk/sts/serafinthesis.pdf
56. Shneiderman, B. (1983). Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer, 16(8), 57-69.
57. Sinico, M. (2008). Demonstration in experimental phenomenology. Theory & Psychology, 18(6), 853-863.
58. Smits-Engelsman, B., Van Galen, G., & Duysens, J. (2002). The breakdown of Fitts' law in rapid, reciprocal aiming movements. Experimental Brain Research, 145(2), 222-230.
59. Snow, K. (n.d.). From keys to the open gate. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://www.snowlight.com/keys.html
60. Spence, C., & Zampini, M. (2006). Auditory contributions to multisensory product perception. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 92(17), 1009-1025.
61. Svanaes, D. (2000). Understanding interactivity: Steps to a phenomenology of human-computer interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. Retrieved November 12, 2009 from http://www.idi.ntnu.no/dags/interactivity.pdf
62. Sweet Maria's home coffee roasting (n.d.). Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://www.sweetmarias.com/
63. Vicario, G. B. (1993). On experimental phenomenology. In S. C. Masin (Ed.), Foundations of perceptual theory (pp. 197-219). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
64. Visell, Y., Franinovic, K., & Hug, D. (2007). Sound product design research: Case studies, participatory design, scenarios, and product concepts. In Closing the loop of sound evaluation and design (Deliverable 3.1, pp.14-20). Zürich, Switzerland: Hochschule für Gestaltung und Kunst. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://closed.ircam.fr/uploads/media/closed_deliverable_3.1_public.pdf
65. Warren, W. H., & Verbrugge, R. R. (1984). Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: A case study in ecological acoustics. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10(5), 704-712.