An enactive approach to the design of new tangible musical instruments

Organised Sound

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 285-296

  Essl, Georg ^a   O'Modhrain, Sile ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62949121114     PISSN: 13557718     EISSN: 14698153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S135577180600152X     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bruner J. 1968. Processes of Cognitive Growth: Infancy. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
2. Cadoz, C. 1988. Instrumental gesture and musical composition. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. (ICMC-88), pp. 1–12. Cologne, Germany, San Francisco: ICMA Press.
3. Cadoz, C., and Wanderley, M. 2000. Gesture - music. In M. Battier and M. Wanderley (eds.) Trends in Gestural Control of Music, pp. 71–93. Paris: Editions IRCAM.
4. Cannon, C., Hughes, S., and O'Modhrain S. 2003. EpipE: exploration of the uilleann pipes as a potential controller for computer-based music. Proc. of the 2003 Int. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression - NIME03, pp. 3–8. Montreal.
5. Ciufo, T. 2003. Design concepts and control strategies for interactive improvisational music systems. In Proc. of MAXIS. Leeds, UK: Sheffield Hallam University.
6. Cook, P. R. 1997. Physically Informed Sonic Modeling (PhISM): synthesis of percussive sounds. Computer Music Journal 21(3): 38-49.
7. Cook, P. R. 1999. Toward physically-informed parametric synthesis of sound effects. Proc. of the 1999 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics ( WASPAA-99), pp. 1–5. New Paltz.
8. Cook, P. R. 2001. Principles for designing computer music controllers. In Proc. of the CHI'01 Workshop: New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME-01). Seattle, WA.
9. Cook, P. R. 2002. Real Sound Synthesis for Interactive Applications, Chapter 13, pp. 149–68. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters, Ltd.
10. Cook, P. R., and Leider, C. 2000. SqueezeVox: a new controller for vocal synthesis models. In Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. Berlin, Germany.
11. Essl, G., Magnusson, C., Eriksson, J., and O'Modhrain, S. Towards evaluation of performance, control and preference in physical and virtual sensorimotor integration. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Enactive Interfaces. Genova, Italy.
12. Essl, G., and O'Modhrain, S. 2005. Scrubber: an interface for friction-induced sounds. Proc. of the Conf. for New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pp. 70–5. Vancouver, Canada.
13. Fels, S. S., and Vogt, F. 2002. Tooka: explorations of two person instruments. Proc. of the Int. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME02), pp. 116–21. Dublin, Ireland.
14. Gamper, D., and Oliveros, P. 1998. The Expanded Instrument System: recent developments. In Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. Ann Arbor, MI.
15. Gillespie, R. B. 1996. Haptic Displays of Systems with Changing KinematicConstraints: The Virtual Piano Action, Ph.D. thesis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
16. Hunt, A., Wanderley, M. M., and Kirk, R. 2000. Towards a model for instrumental mapping in expert musical interaction. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. (ICMC-00), pp. 209–12. Berlin, Germany.
17. Hunt, A., Wanderley, M. M., and Paradis, M. 2002. The importance of parameter mapping in electronic instrument design. Proc. of the 2002 Conf. on New Instruments for Musical Expression (NIME-02), pp. 149–54. Dublin, Ireland.
18. Ishii, H., and Ullmer, B. 1997. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proc. of CHI'97. Atlanta, GA: Association of Computing Machinery. Jehan, T., and Schoner, B. 2001. An audio-driven, spectral analysis-based, perceptual synthesis engine. In Proc. of the 110th AES Convention. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Audio Engineering Society.
19. Jorda, S. 2005. Digital Lutherie - Crafting Musical Computers for New Musics’ Performance and Improvisation, Ph.D. thesis. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
20. Kartomi, M. J. 1990. On Concepts and Classifications of Musical Instruments. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
21. Machover, T. 1992. Hyperinstruments - a composer's approach to the evolution of intelligent musical instruments. In L. Jacobson (ed.) Cyberarts: Exploring Arts and Technology, pp. 67–76. San Francisco: Miller Freeman Inc.
22. Moore, F. R. 1988. The dysfunctions of MIDI. Computer Music Journal 12(1): 19–28.
23. Nicols, R. 2002. The vBow: development of a virtual violin bow haptic human-computer interface. Proc. of the 2002 Conf on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME-02), pp. 29–32. Dublin, Ireland.
24. O'Modhrain, S. 2000. Playing by Feel: Incorporating Haptic Feedback into Computer-Based Musical Instruments, Ph.D. thesis. Palo Alto, California: Stanford University.
25. O'Modhrain, S., and Essl, G. 2004. PebbleBox and CrumbleBag: tactile interfaces for granular synthesis. Proc. of the Conf. for New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pp. 74–9. Hamamatsu, Japan.
26. Orio, N., Schnell, N., and Wanderley, M. M. 2001. Input devices for musical expression: borrowing tools from HCI. In Proc. of the CHI'01 Workshop New Interfaces for musical's Expression (NIME-01). Seattle, WA.
27. Panagiotakis, C., and Tziritas, G. 2004. A speech/music discriminator based on RMS and zero-crossings. Retrieved online on 20 January 2004 at http://www.csd.uch.gr/~tziritas/papers/sound_seg_class_00.pdf.
28. Pasquinelli, E. 2004. Enaction. A State of the Art. Unpublished manuscript.
29. Peeters, G., and Rodet, X. 2002. Automatically selecting signal descriptors for sound classification. Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf., pp. 455–8. Goteborg, Sweden.
30. Puckette, M. S., Apel, T., and Zicarelli, D. D. 1998. Real-time audio analysis tools for Pd and MSP. In Proc. of the Int. Computer Music Conf. Ann Arbor, MI.
31. Rocchesso, D. and Fontana, F. (eds.) 2003. The Sounding Object. PHASAR Sri, Florence, Italy, 2003. Available online at http://www.soundobject.org/SObBook/ SObBook_JUF03.pdf.