The Use of a Trabecular Metal Acetabular Component and Trabecular Metal Augment for Severe Acetabular Defects

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 21, Issue 6 SUPPL., 2006, Pages 83-86

  Sporer, Scott M ^a,b   Paprosky, Wayne G ^a,b  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CENTRAL DUPAGE HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

acetabulum; hip; revision

Indexed keywords

METAL; TANTALUM;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; POROSITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; RECURRENT DISEASE; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL PATIENT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TANTALUM;

EID: 33747878584     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Weinstein. Dartmouth atlas of musculoskeletal healthcare (2001), AHA Press, Chicago (Ill)
2. Paprosky W.G., Perona P.G., and Lawrence J.M. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9 (1994) 33
3. Bradford M.S., and Paprosky W.G. Acetabular defect classification: a detailed radiographic approach. Semin Arthroplasty 6 (1995) 76
4. Emerson Jr. R.H., and Head W.C. Dealing with the deficient acetabulum in revision hip arthroplasty: the importance of implant migration and use of the jumbo cup. Semin Arthroplasty 4 (1993) 2
5. Johnston R.C., Fitzgerald Jr. R.H., Harris W.H., et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 (1990) 161
6. Morsi E., Garbuz D., and Gross A.E. Revision total hip arthroplasty with shelf bulk allografts. A long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 11 (1996) 86
7. Woodgate I.G., Saleh K.J., Jaroszynski G., et al. Minor column structural acetabular allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (2000) 75
8. Sporer S.M., O'Rourke M., Chong P., et al. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 760
9. Goodman S., Saastamoinen H., Shasha N., et al. Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 436
10. Udomkiat P., Dorr L.D., Won Y.Y., et al. Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty 16 (2001) 961
11. Chandler H., Lopez C., Murphy S., et al. Acetabular reconstruction using structural grafts in total hip replacement: a 12 1/2 year follow-up. Semin Arthroplasty 6 (1995) 118
12. Garbuz D., Morsi E., and Gross A.E. Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 (1996) 693
13. Unger A.S., Lewis R.J., and Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 1002
14. Nehme A., Lewallen D.G., and Hanssen A.D. Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 201
15. Bobyn J.D., Stackpool G.J., Hacking S.A., et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81 (1999) 907
16. Zhang Y.A.P., Fitzpatrick D.C., Heiner A.D., et al. Interfacial frictional behavior: cancellous bone, cortical bone, and a novel porous tantalum biomaterial. J Musculoskelet Res 3 (1999) 245