Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring: A case series with a 10-year average follow-up

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 951-958

  Saleh, Khaled J ^a   Jaroszynski, Grzeogrz ^b   Woodgate, Ian ^b   Saleh, Lena ^b   Gross, Allan E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Failed acetabulum; Reconstruction rings allograft; Revision

Indexed keywords

ACETABULOPLASTY; ADULT; ALLOGRAFT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; LEG LENGTH; RECURRENT DISEASE; SALVAGE THERAPY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033635905     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.9055     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Revision and primary hip and knee arthroplasty. A cost analysis
2. Immediate surgery versus waiting list policy in revision total hip arthroplasty. An economic evaluation
3. Devolution of hip and knee replacement surgery
4. Revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum in association with loss of bone stock
5. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty
6. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation
7. Bone grafts in hip replacement surgery. The pelvic side
8. Cementless revision of failed total hip replacement
9. The Burch-Schneider anti-protusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: Indications, principles and long-term results
10. A decision theoretic methodology for severity index development
11. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty: Three to six-year follow-up
12. Revision of acetabular components with an uncemented Harris-Galante porous-coated prosthesis
13. Cemented fixation with bone grafts
14. Poximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: A long-term follow-up study
15. Reconstruction of the difficult acetabulum with an oblong prosthesis: Three to seven year results
16. The Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: Indications, principles and long-term results
17. Acetabular reconstruction with massive acetabular allografts
18. Results of revision hip arthroplasty with cement: A five to fourteen-year follow-up
19. Acetabular reconstruction using bipolar endoprosthesis and bone grafting in patients with severe bone deficiency
20. Failure of structural acetabular allografts in cementless revision hip arthroplasty
21. The fate of massive allografts in total hip acetabular revision surgery
22. Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency
23. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection
24. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis
25. Establishing a surgical bone bank
26. Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision
27. Reconstruction of the acetabulum after iterative surgery of the hip
28. Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty: Sixteen year average follow-up
29. Structural bulk allografts in acetabular reconstruction: Analysis of two grafts retrieved at post-mortem
30. Reconstruction of high hip center in acetabular revision surgery using a cementless acetabular component
31. High hip center in revision arthroplasty
32. Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft: Study with a minimum 5 year follow-up
33. Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusion cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency
34. Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusion cage and cancellous allograft bone