High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 296-300

  van Haaren, E H ^a   Heyligers, I C ^b   Alexander, F G M ^a   Wuisman, P I J M ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Zuyderland Medical Centre   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; BONE ALLOGRAFT; BONE BIOPSY; BONE DEFECT; BONE NECROSIS; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOLYSIS; OVERALL SURVIVAL; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 34147109941     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18080     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A(Suppl 2):2-20.
2. Sporer SM, O'Rourke M, Chong P, Paprosky WG. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88-A(Suppl 1 Pt 1):92-9.
3. Cabanela ME. Reconstruction rings and bone graft in total hip revision surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 1998;29:255-62.
4. Gross AE, Goodman S. The current role of structural grafts and cages in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004;429:193-200.
5. Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW, Buma P. Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup: 20 years' experience. Clin Orthop 2001;393:202-15.
6. Slooff TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW, et al. Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop 1996;324:108-15.
7. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, et al. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993;75-B:14-21.
8. Welten ML, Schreurs BW, Buma P, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty: a 10- to 17-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:819-24.
9. Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Buma P, Gardeniers JW, Huiskes R. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellised cancellous bone graft and cement: a 10- to 15-year follow-up of 60 revision arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:391-5.
10. Eldridge JD, Smith EJ, Hubble MJ, Whitehouse SL, Learmonth ID. Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:535-40.
11. Ornstein E, Atroshi I, Franzen H, et al. Early complications after one hundred and forty-four consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:1323-8.
12. Nelissen RG, Valstar ER, Poll RG, Garling EH, Brand R. Factors associated with excessive migration in bone impaction hip revision surgery: a radiostereometric analysis study. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:826-33.
13. Combs F, Buttaro M, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted bone allografts and cemented acetabular components: a 2- to 13-year follow-up study of 142 aseptic revisions. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:865-9.
14. Slooff TJ, Huiskes R, van Horn J, Lemmens AJ. Bone grafting in total hip replacement for acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand 1984;55:593-6.
15. European Association of Musculo-skeletal Transplantation. Common standard of musculo-skeletal Tissue Banking. European Association for Musculo-skeletal Transplantation 1997. www.eamst.org (date last accessed 7 November 2006).
16. American Association of Tissue Banks. Standards for Tissue Banking. American Association of Tissue Banks 1996 www.aatb.org (date last accessed 7 November 2006).
17. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, et al. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1989;243:126-37.
18. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976;121:20-32.
19. Reckling FW, Asher MA, Dillon WL. A longitudinal study of the radiolucent line at the bone-cement interface following total joint-replacement procedures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1977;59-A:355-8.
20. Burssens P, Dooren JV, Rombouts L, et al. Acetabular bone stock reconstruction with frozen femoral head allografts and the use of a cementless screw cup in total hip revision surgery: a 5 years' clinical, radiologic and scintigraphic follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg 1989;55:38-52.
21. Conn RA, Peterson LFA, Stauffer RN, Ilstrup D. Management of acetabular deficiency: long term results of bone-grafting the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Trans 1985;9:451-2.
22. van der Donk S, Buma P, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW, Schreurs BW. Incorporation of morselized bone grafts: a study of 24 acetabular biopsy specimens. Clin Orthop 2002;396:131-41.
23. Lie SA, Havelin LI, Furnes ON, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE. Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B:504-9.
24. Masterson EL, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The cement mantle in the Exeter impaction allografting technique: a cause for concern. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:759-64.
25. Pekkarinen J, Alho A, Lepisto J, et al. Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery: a high incidence of complications. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2000;82-B:103-7.
26. Schreurs BW, Thien TM, Waal Malefijt MC, et al. Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: three to fourteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:647-52.
27. Bauer TW, Schils J. The pathology of total joint arthroplasty. II: mechanisms of implant failure. Skeletal Radiol 1999;28:483-97.
28. Arts JJ, Verdonschot N, Buma O, Schreurs BW. Larger bone graft size and washing of bone grafts prior to impaction enhanced the initial stability of cemented cups: experiments using a synthetic acetabular model. Acta Orthop 2006;77:227-33.
29. Dunlop DG, Brewster NT, Madabhushi SP, et al. Techniques to improve the shear strength of impacted bone graft: the effect of particle size and washing of the graft. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:639-46.
30. Bolder SB, Schreurs BW, Verdonschot N, et al. Particle size of bone graft and method of impaction affect initial stability of cemented cups: human cadaveric and synthetic pelvic specimen studies. Acta Orthop Scand 2003;74:652-7.