Assessment of accuracy and reliability in preoperative templating for hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 445-449

  Olsen, Michael ^a   Gamble, Patrick ^a   Chiu, Mark ^a   Tumia, Nezar ^a   Boyle, Richard A ^a   Schemitsch, Emil H ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hip resurfacing; Interobserver reliability; Intraobserver reliability; Preoperative digital templating; Templating accuracy

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HIP RESURFACING; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RELIABILITY;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77950515998     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amstutz H.C., Campbell P.A., Le Duff M.J. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:1874.
2. Beaulé P.E., Amstutz H.C. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1162.
3. Freeman M.A. Total surface replacement hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978, 1:2.
4. McMinn D., Daniel J. History and modern concepts in surface replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006, 220:239.
5. Shimmin A.J., Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:463.
6. De Haan R., Pattyn C., Gill H.S., et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1291.
7. De Haan R., Campbell P.A., Su E.P., et al. Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1158.
8. Hart A.J., Buddhdev P., Winship P., et al. Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int 2008, 18:212.
9. Langton D.J., Jameson S.S., Joyce T.J., et al. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1143.
10. Morlock M.M., Bishop N., Ruther W., et al. Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2006, 220:333.
11. Morlock M.M., Bishop N., Zustin J., et al. Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):89.
12. Witzleb WC, Hanisch U, Ziegler J, Guenther KP. In vivo wear rate of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty a review of 10 retrieved components. In Press, J Arthroplasty, available online August 29, 2008.
13. Carter L.W., Stovall D.O., Young T.R. Determination of accuracy of preoperative templating of noncemented femoral prostheses. J Arthroplasty 1995, 10:507.
14. Eggli S., Pisan M., Muller M.E. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:382.
15. Gonzalez della valle A., Slullitel G., Piccaluga F., et al. The precision and usefulness of preoperative planning for cemented and hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:51.
16. Knight J.L., Atwater R.D. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty 1992, 7(Suppl):403.
17. NSKAPPA SPS Available from. ftp://ftp.spss.com/pub/spss/statistics/nichols/macros/nskappa.sps.
18. MKAPPASC SPS Available from. ftp://ftp.spss.com/pub/spss/statistics/nichols/macros/mkappasc.sps.
19. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159.
20. Gonzalez D.V., Comba F., Taveras N., et al. The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2008, 32:289.
21. The B., Diercks R.L., van Ooijen P.M., et al. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. A prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees. Acta Orthop 2005, 76:78.
22. The B., Verdonschot N., van Horn J.R., et al. Digital versus analogue preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasties: a randomized clinical trial of 210 total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:866.
23. Loughead J.M., Starks I., Chesney D., et al. Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:31.
24. Moonot P., Singh P.J., Cronin M.D., et al. Birmingham hip resurfacing: is acetabular bone conserved. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:319.
25. Vendittoli P.A., Lavigne M., Girard J., et al. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:997.
26. Anglin C., Masri B.A., Tonetti J., et al. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 465:71.
27. Davis E.T., Olsen M., Zdero R., et al. A biomechanical and finite element analysis of femoral neck notching during hip resurfacing. J Biomech Eng 2008, [in press].
28. Davis E.T., Olsen M., Zdero R., et al. Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1522.
29. Marker D.R., Seyler T.M., Jinnah R.H., et al. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(7 Suppl 3):66.
30. Markolf K.L., Amstutz H.C. Mechanical strength of the femur following resurfacing and conventional total hip replacement procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980, 1:170.
31. Richards C.J., Giannitsios D., Huk O.L., et al. Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(Suppl 3):96.
32. Vail T.P., Glisson R.R., Dominguez D.E., et al. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:1951.
33. Beaule P.E., Harvey N., Zaragoza E., et al. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:9.
34. Williams D., Royle M., Norton M. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:144.
35. Oddy M.J., Jones M.J., Pendegrass C.J., et al. Assessment of reproducibility and accuracy in templating hybrid total hip arthroplasty using digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:581.
36. Wedemeyer C., Quitmann H., Xu J., et al. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty with the mayo stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008, 128:1023.
37. Clarke I.C., Gruen T., Matos M., et al. Improved methods for quantitative radiographic evaluation with particular reference to total-hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976, 83.
38. Conn K.S., Clarke M.T., Hallett J.P. A simple guide to determine the magnification of radiographs and to improve the accuracy of preoperative templating. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002, 84:269.
39. White S.P., Shardlow D.L. Effect of introduction of digital radiographic techniques on pre-operative templating in orthopaedic practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2005, 87:53.