Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties: A prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 78-84

  The, Bertram ^a   Diercks, Ron L ^a   Van Ooijen, Peter M A ^a   Van Horn, Jim R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALOG COMPUTER; ARTICLE; DIGITAL COMPUTER; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGEON; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT PLANNING; ANALYTICAL ERROR; FEMALE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 14744289111     PISSN: 00016470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016470510030364     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Altmann D G. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, 1991.
2. Barmeir E, Dubowitz B, Roffman M. Computed tomography in the assessment and planning of complicated total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 1982; (53): 597-604.
3. Blackley H R, Howell G E, Rorabeck C H. TI - Planning and management of the difficult primary hip replacement: preoperative planning and technical considerations. Instr Course Lect 2000; (49): 3-11.
4. Capello W N. Preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 1986; (35): 249-57.
5. Dooley R L, Engel C, Muller M E. Automated scanning and digitizing of roentgenographs for documentation and research. Clin Orthop 1992; (274): 113-9.
6. Dore D D, Rubash H E. Primary total hip arthroplasty in the older patient: optimizing the results. Instr Course Lect 1994; (43): 347-57.
7. Eggli S, Pisan M, Muller M E. TI - The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998; 80: 382-90.
8. Foord K. PACS: the second time around. Eur J Radiol 1999; 32: 96-100.
9. Gross-Fengels W, Miedeck C, Siemens P, Appel R, Muckner K, Finsterbusch J, Bonas H. (PACS: from project to reality. Report of experiences on full digitalisation of the radiology department of a major hospital). Radiologe 2002; 42: 119-24.
10. Haddad F S, Masri B A, Garbuz D S, Duncan C P. classification and preoperative planning. Instr Course Lect 2000; 49: 83-96.
11. Heal J, Blewitt N. Kinemax total knee arthroplasty: trial by template. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 90-4.
12. Kerschbaumer F. ("Numerical imaging, operation planning, simulation, navigation, robotics". Do the means determine the end?). Orthopade 2000; 29: 597-8.
13. Knight J L, Atwater R D. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty (7 Suppl) 1992: 403-9.
14. Krackow K A. Total knee arthroplasty: technical planning and surgical aspects. Instr Course Lect 1986; 35: 272-82.
15. Lee K R, Siegel E L, Templeton A W, Dwyer S J, III, Murphey M D, Wetzel L H. State-of-the-art digital radiography. Radiographics 1991; 11: 1013-25.
16. Linclau L, Dokter G, Peene P. Radiological aspects in preoperative planning and postoperative assessment of cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 1993; 59: 163-7.
17. Maass M, Kosonen M, Kormano M. Radiological image data migration. Practical experience and comparison of the costs of work. Acta Radiol 2001; 42: 426-9.
18. Muller M E. Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1992; (274): 12-21.
19. O'Toole R V, III, Jaramaz B, DiGioia A M, III, Visnic C D, Reid R H. TI - Biomechanics for preoperative planning and surgical simulations in orthopaedics. Comput Biol Med 1995; 25: 183-91.
20. Pilling J R. Lessons learned from a whole hospital PACS installation. Picture Archiving and Communication System. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 784-8.
21. Reikeras O, Hoiseth A. Femoral neck angles in osteoarthritis of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand 1982; 53: 781-4.
22. Reiner B I, Siegel E L. Technologists' productivity when using PACS: comparison of film-based versus filmless radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 33-7.
23. Reiner B I, Siegel E L, Flagle C, Hooper F J, Cox R E, Scanlon M. Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services. Radiology 2000; 215: 163-7.
24. Schiffers N, Schkommodau E, Portheine F, Radermacher K, Staudte H W. TI - (Planning and performance of orthopedic surgery with the help of individual templates). Orthopade 2000; 29: 636-40.
25. Scholl E, Holm J, Eggli S. (A new concept for integration of image databanks into a comprehensive patient documentation). Unfallchirurg 2001; 104: 420-5.
26. Starker M, Thumler P, Weipert A, Hanusek S. (Computer-assisted prosthesis selection and implantation control). Orthopade 2000; 29: 627-35.
27. Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Sakai T, Ochi T. Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 1998; 3: 320-4.