Foundations for instructional design: Reclaiming the conversation

Innovations in Instructional Technology: Essays in Honor of M. David Merrill

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 237-252

  Wilson, Brent G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950515548     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613684     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York:Longman.
2. Ausubel, D. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
3. Banathy, B. H. (1968). Instructional systems. Belmont CA: Fearon.
4. Bromley, H., & Apple, M.W. (1998). Education/technology/power: Educational computing as a social practice. Albany: SUNY Press.
5. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.
6. Bunderson, C. V., Gibbons, A. S., Olsen, J. B., & Kearsley, G. P. (1981). Work models: Beyond instructional objectives. Instructional Science, 10, 205-215.
7. Carr, A. A. (1997). User-design in the creation of human learning systems. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(3), 5-22.
8. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Davies, I. K. (1991). Instructional development as an art: One of the three faces of ID. In D. Hlynka & J. C. Belland (Eds.), Paradigms regained: The uses of illuminative, semiotic and post-modern criticism as modes of inquiry in education technology (pp. 93-105). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
10. Dean, P., & Ripley, D. (1998). Performance improvement interventions: Instructional design and training. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: International Society for Performance Improvement.
11. Dick, W. (1978). The educational psychologist as instructional designer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 265-271.
12. Dick, W. (1987). A history of instructional design and its impact on educational psychology. In J. A. Glover & R. R. Ronning (Eds.), Historical foundations of educational psychology (pp. 183-200). New York: Plenum Press.
13. Eisner, E.W. (1979). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan.
14. Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: The outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: NLB.
15. Finn, J. D. (1956). AV development and the concept of systems. Teaching Tools, 3(1), 63-64. [Cited in Dick (1987)].
16. Flood, R. L., & Romm, N. R. (1996). Critical systems thinking: Current research and practice. New York: Plenum Press.
17. Gagné, R. (1962). Military training and principles of learning. American Psychologist, 17, 263-276.
18. Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
19. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20. Gibbons, A. S. (2003). The practice of instructional technology: Science and technology. Educational Technology, 43(5), 11-16.
21. Glaser, R. (1964). Implications of training research for education. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction (pp. 153-181). Sixty-third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Glaser, R. (1965). Toward a behavioral science base for instructional design. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Teaching machines and programmed learning, II (pp. 000-000). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
23. Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (1997). Survey of instructional development models (3rd ed.). Syracuse NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
24. Hannafin, M. J. (1983a). Immediate, sustained, and cumulative effects of an instructional system on mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 89-93.
25. Hannafin, M. J. (1983b). Fruits and fallacies of instructional systems: Effects of an instructional systems approach on the concept attainment of Anglo and Hispanic students. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 237-250.
26. Hung, D.W. L. (1999). Activity, apprenticeship, and epistemological appropriation: Implications from the writings of Michel Polanyi. Educational Psychologist, 34(4), 193-205.
27. IDEAL Lab. (2003). IDEAL Lab website. Retrieved October 15, 2003, from http://www.cudenver.edu/ilt/IDEAL
28. Johnston, V. S. (1999). Why we feel. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
29. Kelly, K. (1994). Out of control: The new biology of machines, social systems, and the economic world. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
30. Kliebard, H. M. (1987). The struggle for the American curriculum 1893-1958. New York:Routledge.
31. Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 61-78.
32. Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
33. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Lumsdaine, A. A. (1960). Design of training aids and devices. In Human factors methods for system design (pp. 217-290). Pittsburgh: American Institute for Research.
35. Lumsdaine, A. A. (1964). Educational technology, programmed learning, and instructional science. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction: The sixty-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1 (pp. 371-401). Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
36. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
37. Melton, A.W. (1959). The science of learning and the technology of educational methods. Harvard Educational Review, 29, 96-106.
38. Merrill, M. D. (1968, April). Components of a cybernetic instructional system. Educational Technology, pp. 5-10.
39. Merrill, M. D. (1975). Leaner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions. AV Communication Review, 23, 217-226.
40. Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J. A., & ID2 Research Group at Utah State University. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5-7. Retrieved October 15, 2003, from http://www.ittheory.com/reclaim.htm
41. Milrad, M., Spector, J. M., & Davidsen, P. I. (2002). Model facilitated learning. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 13-27). London: Kogan Page.
42. Nieveen, N., & Gustafson, K. (1999). Characteristics of computer-based tools for education and training development: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, M. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 155-174). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
43. Nunan, T. (1983). Countering educational design. New York: Nichols.
44. Osguthorpe, R. T., Osguthorpe, R. D., Jacob,W. J., & Davies, R. (2003). The moral dimensions of instructional design. Educational Technology, 43(2), 19-23.
45. Palmer, P. J. (1997, November/December). The heart of a teacher: Identity and integrity in teaching. Change, pp. 15-21.
46. Pask, G. (1975). Conversation, cognition, and learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
47. Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
48. Ragan, T. J., & Smith, P. L. (1996). Conditions-based models for designing instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 541-569). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
49. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Reigeluth, C. M., Bunderson, C.V., & Merrill, M. D. (1978). Is there a design science of instruction? Journal of Instructional Development, 1(2), 11-16.
51. Reiser, R. A. (1987). Instructional technology:Ahistory. In R. M. Gagné (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations (pp. 11-48). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Reiser, R. A. (2001).Ahistory of instructional design and technology. Part 2:Ahistory of instructional design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(2), 57-67.
53. Reiser, R. A., & Ely, D. P. (1997). The field of educational technology as reflected through its definitions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45(3), 63-72.
54. Richey, R. C. (1998). The pursuit of reusable knowledge in instructional technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 7-22.
55. Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd ed.). Syracuse NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
56. Rorty, R. (2000). Private irony and liberal hope. In W. Brogan & J Risser (Eds.), American continental philosophy: A reader (pp. 45-65). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
57. Rose, E. (2002). Boundary talk: A cultural study of the relationship between instructional design and education. Educational Technology, 42(6), 14-22.
58. Rosenberg, M. J. (1982). Our instructional media roots. Performance & Instruction, 21(3), 12-15, 33.
59. Rosenberg, M. J., Coscarelli,W. C., & Hutchison, C. S. (1992). The origins and evolution of the field. In H. D. Stolovich & E. J. Keeps (Eds.), Handbook of human performance technology (pp. 14-31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
60. Ryder, M. (2003a, June). Instructional design models. Retrieved June 10, 2003, from http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/idmodels.html
61. Ryder, M. (2003b, October). Activity theory. Retrieved 15 October 2003, from http://carbon. cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/activity.html
62. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency/Doubleday.
63. Silber, K. H. (1972, September). The learning system:Anewapproach to facilitating learning based on freedom, the future, and educational technology. Audiovisual Instruction, pp. 10-27.
64. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
65. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86-97.
66. Spector, J. M. (2000). System dynamics and interactive learning environments: Lessons learned and implications for the future. Simulation and Gaming 31(3), 457-464.
67. Spector, J. M., & Anderson, T. M. (Eds.). (2000). Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding complexity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
68. Sullivan, H., Ice, K., & Niedermeyer, F. (2000). Long-term instructional development: A 20-year ID and implementation project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 87-99.
69. Sweller, J. (1989). Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 457-466.
70. Thorndike, E. (1913). Educational psychology: The Psychology of learning. New York:Teachers College Press.
71. Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72. van den Akker, J., Branch, R. M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, M., & Plomp, T. (1999). Design approaches and tools in education and training. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
73. Visscher-Voerman, I., Gustafson, K., & Plomp, T. (1999). Educational design and development:An overview of paradigms. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, M. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 15-28). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
74. Wedman, J., & Tessmer, M. (1993). Instructional designers'decisions and priorities:Asurvey of design practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(2), 43-57.
75. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
76. Wilson, B. G. (1997). Thoughts on theory in educational technology. Educational Technology, 37(1), 2-26.
77. Wilson, B. G. (2002). Trends and futures of education: Implications for distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(1), 65-77.
78. Wilson, B., & Ryder, M. (1996). Dynamic learning communities: An alternative to designed instructio. In M. Simonson (Ed.), Proceedings of selected research and development presentations (pp. 800-809). Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved 23 September 2003, from http://carbon. cudenver.edu/~bwilson/dlc.html
79. Winn, W. D. (1975). An open system model of learning. AV Communication Review, 23, 5-33.