Partial deafness cochlear implantation provides benefit to a new population of individuals with hearing loss

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 126, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 934-940

  Skarzynski, Henryk ^a   Lorens, Artur ^a   Piotrowska, Anna ^a   Anderson, Ilona ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF HEARING   (Poland)

^b Clinical Research Department   (Austria)

Author keywords

APHAB questionnaire; Monosyllable testing; Partial deafness cochlear implantation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33947111373     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: 16512553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480600606632     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Dubno JR, Dirks DD, Schaefer AB. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with highfrequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;85:355-64.
2. Hogan CA, Turner CW. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:432-41.
3. Turner CW, Cummings KJ. Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Am J Audiol 1999;8:47-56.
4. Smoorenburg GF. On the limited transfer of information with noise-induced hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1990;469:38-46.
5. McDermott HJ, Dean MR. Speech perception with steeply sloping hearing loss: effects of frequency transposition. Br J Audiol 2000;34:353-61.
6. Rizer FM. Post operative audiometric evaluation of cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;98:203-6.
7. Bogess W, Baker J, Balkany T. Loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1989;99:1002-5.
8. Hodges AV, Schloffman J, Balkany T. Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1997;18:179-83.
9. von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillien J, Pfenningdorf T, Hartmann R, Stürzebecher E, et al. Electric-acoustic-stimulation (EAS) of the auditory system. New technology against severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999;61:334-40.
10. Kiefer J, Tillein J, von Ilberg C, Pfennigdorff T, Sturzebender E, Klinke R, et al. Fundamental aspects and first results of the clinical application of combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. In: Kubo T, Takahashi Y, Iwaki T, editors. Cochlear implants - an update. The Hague, Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 2002. p. 569-76.
11. Gantz BJ, Turner CW. Combining acoustic and electric hearing. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1726-30.
12. Kiefer J, Gstöttner W, Baumgartner W, Pok S, Tillein J, Ye Q, et al. Conservation of low frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2004;124:272-80.
13. Gstöttner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner W, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2004;124:348-52.
14. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A. A new method of partial deafness treatment. Med Sci Monit 2003;9:CS20-4.
15. Harrell RW. Puretone evaluation. In: Katz J, editor. Handbook of clinical audiology. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. p. 71-87.
16. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB). Ear Hear 1995;16:176-86.
17. Dorman MF, Loizou PC, Spahr A, Dana CJ. Simulations of combined acoustic/electric hearing. Presented at: Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Cancun, Mexico, 17-21 September 2003, 1999-1001, Wisconsin: IEEE.