Estimating the time-to-passage of visual self-motion: Is the second order motion information processed?

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 914-923

  Capelli, Aurore ^a   Berthoz, Alain ^a   Vidal, Manuel ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Motion perception; Self motion perception; Speed estimation; Timing

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VIDEO RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77950299700     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Andersen G.J., Cisneros J., Atchley P., Saidpour A. Speed, size, and edge-rate information for the detection of collision events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:256-269.
2. Babler T.G., Dannemiller J.L. Role of image acceleration in judging landing location of free-falling projectiles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:15-31.
3. Benguigui N., Ripoll H., Broderick M.P. Time-to-contact estimation of accelerated stimuli is based on first-order information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:1083-1101.
4. Bootsma R.J., Craig C.M. Information used in detecting upcoming collision. Perception 2003, 32:525-544.
5. Bootsma R.J., Fayt V., Zaal F.T.J.M., Laurent M. On the information-based regulation of movement: What Wann (1996) might want to consider. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:1282-1289.
6. Bootsma R.J., Peper C.E. Predictive visual information sources for the regulation of action with special emphasis on catching and hitting. Visual and motor control 1992, 285-314. Elsevier, Amsterdam. L. Proteau, D. Elliott (Eds.).
7. Brouwer A.M., Brenner E., Smeets J.B. Perception of acceleration with short presentation times: Can acceleration be used in interception?. Perception and Psychophysics 2002, 64:1160-1168.
8. Calderone J.B., Kaiser M.K. Visual acceleration detection: Effect of sign and motion orientation. Perception and Psychophysics 1989, 45:391-394.
9. Cavallo V., Laurent M. Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception 1988, 17:623-632.
10. Coull J.T., Vidal F., Goulon C., Nazarian B., Craig C. Using time-to-contact information to assess potential collision modulates both visual and temporal prediction networks. Frontiers of Hormone Neuroscience 2008, 2:10.
11. DeLucia P.R. Size-arrival effects: The potential roles of conflicts between monocular and binocular time-to-contact information, and of computer aliasing. Perception and Psychophysics 1999, 61:1168-1177.
12. DeLucia P.R., Kaiser M., Bush J., Meyer L., Sweet B. Information integration in judgements of time to contact. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 2003, 56:1165-1189.
13. DeLucia P.R., Liddell G.W. Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:901-914.
14. DeLucia P.R., Warren R. Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:783-798.
15. Dichgans J., Brandt T. Visual-vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. Handbook of sensory physiology 1978, 755-804. Springer, Berlin, Germany. H.W.L.H.L.T.R. Held (Ed.).
16. Gray R., Regan D. Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision. Current Biology 2000, 10:587-590.
17. Jagacinski R.J., Johnson W.W., Miller R.A. Quantifying the cognitive trajectories of extrapolated movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983, 9:43-57.
18. Kaiser M.K., Hecht H. Time-to-passage judgments in nonconstant optical flow fields. Perception and Psychophysics 1995, 57:817-825.
19. Kaiser M.K., Mowafy L. Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observers' sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:1028-1040.
20. Lee D.N. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 1976, 5:437-459.
21. Lee D.N. The optic flow field: The foundation of vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1980, 290:169-179.
22. Lee D.N., Davies M.N., Green P.R., Weel F.R.v.d. Visual control of velocity of approach by pigeons when landing. Journal of Experimental Biology 1993, 180:85-104.
23. Lee D.N., Young D.S., Reddish P.E., Lough S., Clayton T.M. Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 1983, 35:333-346.
24. Manser M.P., Hancock P.A. Influence of approach angle on estimates of time-to-contact. Ecological Psychology 1996, 8:71-99.
25. McLeod R.W., Ross H.E. Optic-flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates. Perception 1983, 12:417-423.
26. Michaels C.F., Zeinstra E.B., Oudejans R.R. Information and action in punching a falling ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 2001, 54:69-93.
27. Nishiike S., Nakagawa S., Nakagawa A., Uno A., Tonoike M., Takeda N., et al. Magnetic cortical responses evoked by visual linear forward acceleration. NeuroReport 2002, 13:1805-1808.
28. Port N.L., Lee D., Dassonville P., Georgopoulos A.P. Manual interception of moving targets I. Performance and movement initiation. Experimental Brain Research 1997, 116:406-420.
29. Rock P.B., Harris M.G., Yates T. A test of the tau-dot hypothesis of braking control in the real world. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1479-1484.
30. Rosenbaum D.A. Perception and extrapolation of velocity and acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1975, 1:395-403.
31. Runeson S. Constant velocity-not perceived as such. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 1974, 37:3-23.
32. Savelsbergh G.J., Whiting H.T., Bootsma R.J. Grasping tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991, 17:315-322.
33. Savelsbergh G.J., Whiting H.T., Burden A.M., Bartlett R.M. The role of predictive visual temporal information in the coordination of muscle activity in catching. Experimental Brain Research 1992, 89:223-228.
34. Savelsbergh G.J., Whiting H.T., Pijpers J.R., van Santvoord A.A. The visual guidance of catching. Experimental Brain Research 1993, 93:148-156.
35. Schiff W., Oldak R. Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:303-316.
36. Schmerler J. The visual perception of accelerated motion. Perception 1976, 5:167-185.
37. Smeets J.B., Brenner E., Trebuchet S., Mestre D.R. Is judging time-to-contact based on 'tau'?. Perception 1996, 25:583-590.
38. Tresilian J.R. Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action. Perception 1990, 19:223-239.
39. Tresilian J.R. Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks. Perception and Psychophysics 1995, 57:231-245.
40. Tresilian J.R. Correcting some misperceptions of time-to-collision: A critical note. Perception 1997, 26:229-236.
41. Wann J.P. Anticipating arrival: Is the tau margin a specious theory?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:1031-1048.
42. Webb N.A., Griffin M.J. Eye movement, vection, and motion sickness with foveal and peripheral vision. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 2003, 74:622-625.
43. Werkhoven P., Snippe H.P., Toet A. Visual processing of optic acceleration. Vision Research 1992, 32:2313-2329.
44. Yakimoff N., Mateeff S., Ehrenstein W.H., Hohnsbein J. Motion extrapolation performance. A linear model approach. Human Factors 1993, 35:501-510.
45. Yilmaz E.H., Warren W.H. Visual control of braking: A test of the tau hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:996-1014.