Size-arrival effects: The potential roles of conflicts between monocular and binocular time-to-contact information, and of computer aliasing

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1168-1177

  DeLucia, Patricia R ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0033174849     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03207621     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BAKER, C. A., & STEEDMAN, W. C. (1961). Perceived movement in depth as a function of luminance and velocity. Human Factors, 3, 166-173.
2. CAIRO, J. K., & HANCOCK, P. A. (1994). The perception of arrival time for different oncoming vehicles at an intersection. Ecological Psychology, 6, 83-109.
3. CAVALLO, V., & LAURENT, M. (1988). Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception, 17, 623-632.
4. DELUCIA, P. R. (1989). Pictorial depth cues and motion-produced information for depth perception. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1526, 51-03B. (University Microfilms No. 90-20517)
5. DELUCIA, P. R. (1991a). Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 738-748.
6. DELUCIA, P. R. (1991b). Small near objects can appear farther than large far objects during object motion and self motion: Judgments of object-self and object-object collisions. In P. J. Beek, R. J. Bootsma, & P. C. W. van Wieringen (Eds.). Studies in perception and action: Posters presented at the VIth International Conference on Event Perception and Action (pp. 94-100). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
7. DELUCIA, P. R. (1995). Effects of pictorial relative size and ground-intercept information on judgments about potential collision in perspective displays. Human Factors, 37, 528-538.
8. DELUCIA, P. R., & LIDDELL, G. W. (1998). Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 901-914.
9. DELUCIA, P. R., & NOVAK, J. B. (1997). Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 913-928.
10. DELUCIA, P. R., & WARREN, R. (1994). Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 783-798.
11. GRAY, R., & REGAN, D. (1996). Estimates of time to collision based on binocular and monocular visual information [Abstract], Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 37, S652.
12. GRAY, R., & REGAN, D. (1998). Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Research, 38, 499-512.
13. GRAY, R., & REGAN, D. (1999). Motion in depth: Adequate and inadequate simulation. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 236-245.
14. HECHT, H., KAISER, M. K., SAVELSBERGH, G. J. P., & VAN DER KAMP, J. (1996, November). The effect of time-sampling on temporal range judgments in real and simulated environments. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
15. HEUER, H. (1993 ). Estimates of time to contact based on changing size and changing target vergence. Perception, 22, 549-663.
16. HILLS, B. L. (1975). Some studies of movement perception, age and accidents (Rep. No. SR137). Crowthorne, England: Department of the Environment, Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
17. HOCHBERG, J. (1986). Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 22-1 to 22-64). Toronto: Wiley.
18. KAISER, M. K., & MOWAFY, L. (1993). Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observers' sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1028-1040.
19. KEBECK, G., & LANDWEHR, K. (1992). Optical magnification as event information. Psychological Research, 54, 146-159.
20. LEE, D. N. (1974). Visual information during locomotion. In R. B. MacLeod & H. L. Pick, Jr. (Eds.), Perception: Essays in honor of James J. Gibson (pp. 250-267). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21. LEE, D. N. (1980). The optic flow field: The foundation of vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 290, 169-179.
22. MICHAELS, C. F. ZEINSTRA, E., & OUDEJANS, R. R. D. (1997). Information and action in timing the punching of a falling ball [Abstract]. In G. L. Torenvliet & K. J. Vicente (Eds.), Ninth International Conference on Perception and Action: Proceedings (p. 16). Scarborough, ON: University of Toronto, International Society for Ecological Psychology.
23. MORGAN, M. J. (1980). Analogue models of motion perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 290, 117-135.
24. REGAN, D. (1997). Visual factors in hitting and catching. Journal of Sports Sciences, 15, 533-558.
25. REGAN, D., & HAMSTRA, S. J. (1993). Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion. Vision Research, 33, 447-462.
26. SAVELSBERGH, G. J. P., WHITING, H. T. A., & BOOTSMA, R. J. (1991). Grasping tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 315-322.
27. SCHIFF, W., & DETWILER, M. L. (1979). Information used in judging impending collision. Perception, 8, 647-658.
28. SCHIFF, W., & OLDAK, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 303-316.
29. SMITH, W. M., & GULICK, W. L. (1957). Dynamic contour perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 145-151.
30. TODD, J. T. (1981). Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 795-810.
31. TRESILIAN, J. R. (1993). Four questions of time-to-contact: A critical analysis of research into interceptive timing. Perception, 22, 653-680.
32. TRESILIAN, J. R. (1994). Perceptual and motor processes in interceptive timing. Human Movement Science, 13, 335-373.
33. TRESILIAN, J. R. (1995). Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 231-245.
34. VINCENT, A., & REGAN, D. (1997). Judging the time to collision with a simulated textured object: Effect of mismatching rate of expansion of object size and of texture element size. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 32-36.
35. WANN, J. P. (1996). Anticipating arrival: Is the tau margin a specious theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1031-1048.
36. WATT, A. (1989). Fundamentals of three-dimensional computer graphics. Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.
37. YILMAZ, E. H., & WARREN, W. H. (1995). Visual control of braking: A test of the tau-dot hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 996-1014.