Information and action in punching a falling ball

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 69-93

  Michaels, Claire F ^a   Zeinstra, Edzard B ^a   Oudejans, Raôul R D ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0035256940     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980042000039     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bootsma, R.J., & van Wieringen, P.C.W. (1990). Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 21-29.
2. DeLucia, P.R. (1991). Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 738-748.
3. DeLucia, P.R., & Warren, R. (1994). Pictorial amd motion-based information during active control of self-motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 783-789.
4. Gibson, J.J. (1982). The useful dimensions of sensitivity. In E. Reed & R. Jones (Eds.), Reasons for realism (pp. 350-373). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Original work published 1963).
5. Gray, R., & Regan, D. (1998). Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Research, 38, 499-512.
6. Heuer, H. (1993). Apparent motion in depth resulting from changing size and changing vergence. Perception, 22, 549-563.
7. Judge, S.J., & Bradford, C.M. (1988). Adaptation to telesterereoscopic viewing measured by one-handed ball-catching performance. Perception, 17, 783-802.
8. Kugler, P.N., & Turvey, M.T (1987). Information, natural law and the self assembly of rhythmic movements. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Laurent, M., Montagne, G., & Durey, A. (1996). Binocular invariants in interceptive tasks: A directed perception approach. Perception, 25, 1437-1450.
10. Lee, D.N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
11. Lee, D.N., Young, D.S., Reddish, D.E., Lough, S., & Clayton, T.M.H. (1983). Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 333-346.
12. Lee, D.N., Young, D.S., & Rewt, D. (1992). How do somersaulters land on their feet? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1195-1202.
13. Michaels, C.F., & de Vries, M.M. (1998). Higher-order and lower-order variables in the visual perception of relative pulling force. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 526-546.
14. Oudejans, R.R.D., Michaels, C.F., & de Vries, M.M. (1993a). Testing tau: Which tau is actually used? In S.S. Valenti & J.B. Pittenger (Eds.), Studies in perception and action II (pp. 353-357). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Oudejans, R.R.D., Michaels, C.F., & de Vries, M.M. (1993b). The optical basis of time-to-contact judgments. In S.S. Valenti & J.B. Pittenger (Eds.), Studies in perception and action II (pp. 358-361). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Rushton, S.K., & Wann, J.P. (1999). Weighted combination of size and disparity: A computational model for timing a ball catch. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 186-190.
17. Schöner, G. (1994). Dynamic theory of action-perception patterns: The time-before-contact paradigm. Human Movement Science, 13, 415-439.
18. Shaw, R.E., & Turvey, M.T. (1981). Coalitions as models for ecosystems: A realist perspective on perceptual organization. In M. Kubovy & J. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 343-415). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Tresilian, J.R. (1990). Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action. Perception, 19, 223-239.
20. Tresilian, J.R. (1993). Four questions of time to contact: A critical examination of research on interceptive timing. Perception, 22, 653-680.
21. Turvey, M.T., & Kugler, P.N. (1984). An ecological approach to perception and action. In H.T.A. Whiting (Ed.), Human motor actions: Bernstein reassessed (pp. 373-412). Amsterdam: North Holland.
22. van Ingen Schenau, G.J. (1989). From rotation to translation: Implications for theories of motor control (response to reactions). Human Movement Science, 8, 423-442.
23. van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G.P.J., & Smeets, J. (1997). Multiple information sources in interceptive timing. Human Movement Science, 16, 787-821.
24. Wann, J.P. (1996). Anticipating arrival: Is the tau-margin a specious theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1031-1048.
25. Warren, W.H. (1988). Action modes and laws of control for the visual guidance of action. In O.G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behaviour: 'The' motor-action controversy (pp. 339-380). Amsterdam: North Holland.
26. Warren, W.H., Young, D., & Lee, D.N. (1986). Visual control of step length during running over irregular terrain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 259-266.