Time-to-Contact Estimation of Accelerated Stimuli Is Based on First-Order Information

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1083-1101

  Benguigui, Nicolas ^a   Ripoll, Hubert ^b   Broderick, Michael P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION;

ADULT; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0347622703     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.6.1083     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Babler, T. G., & Dannemiller, J. L. (1993). Role of image acceleration in judging landing location of free-falling projectiles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 15-31.
2. Benguigui, N. (1997). Effet de la pratique d'un sport de balle sur le développement des processus perceptifs impliqués dans les actions d'interception [Effects of tennis practice on the coincidence timing accuracy of adults and children]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
3. Benguigui, N., Ripoll, H., & Broderick, M. P. (2002), Intercepting accelerating objects. In K. Davids, G. Savelsbergh, S. Bennett, & J. Van Der Kamp (Eds.), Dynamic interception actions in sport: Current research and practical application (pp. 158-171). London: Routledge.
4. Bootsma, R. J., Fayt, V., Zaal, F. T. J. M., & Laurent, M. (1997). On the information-based regulation of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1282-1289.
5. Bootsma, R. J., Marteniuk, R. G., & MacKenzie, C. L. (1991). Perception of time-to-contact for actions of different duration. In P. J. Beek, R. J. Bootsma, & P. C. W. van Wieringen (Eds.), Studies in perception and action: Proceedings from the 6th International Conference on Event Perception and Action (pp. 188-192). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
6. Bootsma, R. J., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (1993). Visual information about the time to collision between two objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1041-1052.
7. Bootsma, R. J., & Peper, C. E. (1992). Predictive visual information sources for the regulation of action with special emphasis on catching and hitting. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 285-314). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
8. Bootsma, R. J., & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1990). Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 21-29.
9. Brenner, E., Smeets, J. B., & de Lussanet, M. H. (1998). Hitting moving targets: Continuous control of the acceleration of the hand on the basis of the target's velocity. Experimental Brain Research, 122, 467-474.
10. Brouwer, A.-M., Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2002). Perception of acceleration with short presentation time: Can acceleration be used in interception? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1160-1168.
11. Caird, J. K., & Hancock, P. A. (1994). The perception of arrival time for different oncoming vehicles at an intersection. Ecological Psychology, 6, 83-109.
12. Calderone, J. B., & Kaiser, M. K. (1989). Visual acceleration detection: Effect of sign and motion orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 391-394.
13. Carel, W. L. (1961). Visual factors in the contact analog (Report No. R61ELC60, NTIS No. 263-820). Ithaca, NY: General Electric Company Advanced Electronics Center.
14. Carlton, L. G. (1992). Visual processing time and the control of movement. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 3-31). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
15. Cavallo, V., & Laurent, M. (1988). Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception, 17, 623-632.
16. Chapman, S. (1968). Catching a baseball. American Journal of Physics, 36, 868-870.
17. Cutting, J. E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. DeLucia, P. R., & Lidell, G. W. (1998). Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking process in prediction motion tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 901-914.
19. Dessing, J. C., Bullock, D., Peper, C. E., & Beek, P. J. (2002). Prospective control of manual interceptive actions: Comparative simulations of extant and new model construct. Neural Networks, 15, 163-179.
20. Dubrowski, A., & Carnahan, H. (2000). Task dependent processing of visual information about target acceleration. Brain and Cognition, 43, 172-177.
21. Dubrowski, A., & Carnahan, H. (2002). Action-perception dissociation in response to target acceleration. Vision Research, 42, 1465-1473.
22. Dubrowski, A., Lam, J., & Carnahan, H. (2000). Target velocity effects on manual interception kinematics. Acta Psychologica, 104, 103-118.
23. Fleury, M., Bard, C., Teasdale, N., Michaud, D., & Lamarre, Y. (1999). How efficient are the central mechanisms for the learning and retention of coincident timing actions? Neuropsychologia, 37, 723-730.
24. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
25. Kaiser, M. K., & Hecht, H. (1995). Time-to-passage judgments in non-constant optical flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 817-825.
26. Kaiser, M. K., & Mowafy, L. (1993). Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observers' sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1028-1040.
27. Keil, D., Holmes, P., Bennett, S., Davids, K., & Smith, N. (2000). Theory and practice in sport psychology and motor behaviour needs to be constrained by integrative modeling of brain and behaviour. Journal of Sport Sciences, 18, 433-443.
28. Lacquaniti, F., Carozzo, M., & Borghese, N. (1993). The role of vision in tuning anticipatory motor responses of the limbs. In A. Berthoz (Ed.), Multisensory control of movement (pp. 379-393). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
29. Lacquaniti, F., & Maioli, C. (1989a). Adaptation to suppression of visual information during catching. Journal of Neurosciences, 9, 149-159.
30. Lacquaniti, F., & Maioli, C. (1989b). The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching. Journal of Neuro-sciences, 9, 134-148.
31. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
32. Lee D. N. (1980). Visuo-motor co-ordination in space-time. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 281-293). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
33. Lee, D. N., Port, N. L., & Georgopoulos A. P. (1997). Manual interception of moving targets: II. On-line control of overlapping submovements. Experimental Brain Research, 116, 421-433.
34. Lee, D. N., & Young, D. S. (1985). Visual timing in interceptive actions. In D. J. Ingle, M. Jeannerod, & D. N. Lee (Eds.), Brain mechanisms and spatial vision (pp. 1-30). Dortrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
35. Lee, D. N., Young, D. S., Reddish, P. E., Lough, S., & Clayton, T. M. H. (1983). Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 35(A), 333-346.
36. McIntyre, J., Zago, M., Berthoz, A., & Lacquaniti, F. (2001). Does the brain model Newton's laws? Nature Neurosciences, 4, 693-694.
37. McLeod, P. (1987). Visual reaction time and high-speed ball games. Perception, 16, 49-59.
38. McLeod, P., Reed, N., & Dienes, Z. (2001). Toward a unified fielder theory: What we do not yet know about how people run to catch a ball. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1347-1355.
39. McLeod, R. W., & Ross, H. E. (1983). Optic flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates. Perception, 12, 417-423.
40. Michaels, C. F., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (1992). The optics and actions of catching fly balls: Zeroing out optical acceleration. Ecological Psychology, 4, 199-222.
41. Michaels, C. F., Zeinstra, E. B., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2001). Information and action in punching a falling ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54(A), 69-93.
42. Montagne, G., Fraisse, F., Ripoll H., & Laurent, M. (2000). Perception-action coupling in an interceptive task: First-order time-to-contact as an input variable. Human Movement Science, 19, 59-72.
43. Oudejans, R. R. D., Michaels, C. F., Bakker, F. C., & Davids, K. (1999). Shedding some light on catching in the dark: Perceptual mechanisms for catching fly balls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 531-542.
44. Peper, C. E., Bootsma, R. J., Mestre, D. R., & Bakker, F. C. (1994). Catching balls: How to get the hand to the right place at the right time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 591-612.
45. Port, N. L., Lee, D., Dassonville, P., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (1997). Manual interception of moving targets: I. Performance and movement initiation. Experimental Brain Research, 116, 406-420.
46. Regan, D. (1997). Visual factors in hitting and catching. Journal of Sport Sciences, 15, 533-558.
47. Regan, D. M., Kaufman, L., & Lincoln, J. (1986). Motion in depth and visual acceleration. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of human perception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 19-1-19-46). New York: Wiley.
48. Ripoll, H., & Latin, I. (1997). Effect of expertise in a fast ball game on coincident-timing accuracy. Journal of Sport Sciences, 15, 573-580.
49. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1975). Perception and extrapolation of velocity and acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 395-403.
50. Savelsbergh, G. J. P., Whiting, H. T. A., & Bootsma, R. J. (1991). "Grasping" tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 315-322.
51. Schiff, W., & Detwiler, M. (1979). Information used in judging impending collision. Perception, 8, 647-658.
52. Schiff, W., & Oldak, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modularity, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 303-316.
53. Schmidt, R. A., & Russel, D. G. (1972). Movement velocity and movement time as determiners of degree of preprogramming in simple movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96, 315-320.
54. Shea, C. H. (1980). Effects of extended practice and movement time on the control of a coincident timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 51, 369-381.
55. Sidaway, B., Fairweather, M., Sekiya, H., & McNitt-Gray, J. (1996). Time-to-collision estimation in a simulated driving task. Human Factors, 38, 101-113.
56. Smeets, B. J., Brenner, E., & de Lussanet, M. H. E. (1998). Visuomotor delays when hitting running spiders. In B. Bril, A. Ledebt, G. Dietrich, & A. Roby-Brami (Eds.). Advances in perception-action-coupling (pp. 36-40). Paris: EDK.
57. Smeets, J. B. J., Brenner, E., Trébuchet, S., & Mestre, D. R. (1996). Is judging time-to-contact based on "tau"? Perception, 25, 583-590.
58. Todd, J. T. (1981). Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 795-810.
59. Tresilian, J. R. (1990). Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action. Perception, 19, 223-239.
60. Tresilian, J. R. (1993). Four questions of time to contact: A critical examination of research on interceptive timing. Perception, 22, 653-680.
61. Tresilian, J. R. (1994a). Approximate information sources and perceptual variables in interceptive timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 154-173.
62. Tresilian, J. R. (1994b). Perceptual and motor processes in interceptive timing. Human Movement Science, 13, 335-373.
63. Tresilian, J. R. (1995). Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction motion and relative judgment tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 231-245.
64. Tresilian, J. R. (1997). A revised tau hypothesis: Consideration of Wann's (1996) analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1272-1281.
65. Tresilian, J. R. (1999a). Analysis of recent empirical challenges to an account of interceptive timing. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 3, 515-528.
66. Tresilian, J. R. (1999b). Visually timed action: Time-out for "tau"? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 301-310.
67. Tresilian, J. R., & Lonergan, A. (2002). Intercepting a moving target: Effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 193-207.
68. Wann, J. P. (1996). Anticipating arrival: Is the tau margin a specious theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1031-1048.
69. Werkhoven, P., Snippe, H., & Toet, A. (1992). Visual processing of optic acceleration. Vision Research, 32, 2313-2329.
70. Whiting, H. T. A., Gill, E. B., & Stephenson, J. M. (1970). Critical time intervals for taking in flight information in a ball-catching task. Ergonomics, 13, 265-272.
71. Whiting, H. T. A., & Sharp, R. H. (1974). Visual occlusion factors in a discrete ball-catching task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 11-16.
72. Yakimoff, N., Mateeff, S., Ehrenstein, W. H., & Hohnsbein, J. (1993). Motion extrapolation performance: A linear model approach. Human Factors, 35, 501-510.
73. Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins B., & Kisselburgh L. (1987). The effects of movement distance and movement time on visual feedback processing in aimed hand movements. Acta Psychologica, 65, 181-191.