Influence of Approach Angle on Estimates of Time-To-Contact

Ecological Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 71-99

  Manser, M P ^a   Hancock, P A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542562077     PISSN: 10407413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326969eco0801_4     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Caird, J. K., & Hancock, P. A. (1994). The perception of arrival time for different oncoming vehicles at an intersection. Ecological Psychology, 6, 83-109.
2. Carel, W. L., (1961). Visual factors in the contact analog (Pub. No. R61ELC60.34). Ithaca, NY: General Electric Company Advanced Electronics Center.
3. Cavallo, V., & Laurent, M. (1988). Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception, 17, 623-632.
4. Chapanis, A. (1988). Some generalizations about generalization. Human Factors, 30, 253-267.
5. DeLucia, P. R. (1991). Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 738-748.
6. Ellingstad, V. S., & Heimstra, N. W. (1969). Velocity-time estimation as a function of target speed and concealment extent. Human Factors, 11, 305-312.
7. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Original work published 1979).
8. Groeger, J. A., & Cavallo, V., (1991). Judgments of time to collision and time to coincidence. In A. G. Gale, I. D. Brown, C. M. Haslegrave, I. Moorehead, and S. Taylor (Eds.), Vision in vehicles - III (pp. 27-34). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9. Groeger, J. A., Grande, G., & Brown, I. D. (1991). Accuracy and safety: Effects of different training procedures on a time-to-coincidence task. In A. G. Gale, I. D. Brown, C. M. Haslegrave, I. Moorehead, & S. Taylor (Eds.), Vision in vehicles - III (pp. 35-43). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
10. Hancock, P. A. (1995). On accidents. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Transportation Research Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
11. Hancock, P. A. (1994). Sex differences in the dimension of time. Human Factors Research Laboratory Technical Report 94-01.
12. Hancock, P. A., Arthur, E. J., Chrysler, S. T., & Lee, J. (1994). The effects of sex, target duration, and illumination on the production of time intervals. Acta Psychologica, 86, 57-67.
13. Hancock, P. A., and Manser, M. P. (1996). Time-to contact. In A. M. Feyer and A. M. Williamson (Eds.), Occupational injury: Risk, prevention, and intervention. London: Taylor and Francis.
14. Herstein, R. J., & Walker, M. L. (1993). Perception of vehicle speed as a function of vehicle size. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 566-568.
15. Hoffmann, E. R., & Mortimer, R. G. (1994). Drivers' estimates of time to collision. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26, 511-520.
16. Kaiser, M. K., & Mowafy, L. (1993). Optical specification of time to passage: Observers' sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1028-1040.
17. Kantowitz, B. H. (1992). Selecting measures for human factors research. Human Factors, 34, 387-398.
18. Knowles, W. B., & Carel, W. L. (1958). Estimating time-to-collision. American Psychologist, 13, 405-406.
19. Law, D. J., Pelligrino, J. W., Mitchell, S. R., Fischer, S. C., McDonald, T. P., & Hunt, E. B. (1993). Perceptual and cognitive factors governing performance in comparative arrival time estimates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1183-1199.
20. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
21. Minnesota Department of Public Safety. (1995). Minnesota motor vehicle crash facts 1994. Office of Traffic Safety, Minnesota Department of Public Safety.
22. McLeod, R. W., & Ross, H. E. (1983). Optic flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates. Perception, 12, 417-423.
23. National Safety Council. (1994). Accident facts, 1994 edition. Itasca, IL: Author.
24. Schiff, W., & Arnone, W. (1995). Perceiving and driving: Where parallel roads meet. In P. A. Hancock, J. Flach, J. Caird, & K. Vicente (Eds.), Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems (Vol. 2, pp. 1-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Schiff, W., & Detwiler, M. (1979). Information used in judging impending collisions. Perception, 8, 647-658.
26. Schiff, W., & Oldak, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time-to-arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and sex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 303-316.
27. Schiff, W., Oldak, R., & Shah, V. (1992). Aging persons' estimates of vehicular motion. Psychology and Aging, 7, 518-525.
28. Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
29. Stoffregen, T. A., & Riccio, G. E. (1990). Responses to optical looming in the retinal center and periphery. Ecological Psychology, 2, 251-274.
30. Transportation Research Board. (1990). Safety research for a changing highway environment. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
31. Treisman, M., Cook, N., Naish, P., & MacCrone, J. (1994). The internal clock: Electroencephalographic evidence for oscillatory processes underlying time perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A, 241-289.
32. Tresilian, J. R. (1991). Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time-to-contact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 865-876.
33. Tresilian, J. R. (1995). Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 231-245.