Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 103, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 221-227

  Aykent, Filiz ^a   Yondem, Isa ^a   Ozyesil, Atilla G ^a   Gunal, Solen K ^a   Avunduk, Mustafa C ^a   Ozkan, Semiha ^b  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; DENTAL PELLICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BACTERIAL ADHESION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL PELLICLE; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; MATERIALS TESTING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 77950248545     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60034-0     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Tezvergil A., Lassila L.V., and Vallittu P.K. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent 31 (2003) 521-525
2. Konishi N., Torii Y., Kurosaki A., Takatsuka T., Itota T., and Yoshiyama M. Confocal laser scanning microscopic analysis of early plaque formed on resin composite and human enamel. J Oral Rehabil 30 (2003) 790-795
3. Buergers R., Rosentritt M., and Handel G. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material. J Prosthet Dent 98 (2007) 461-469
4. Steinberg D., and Eyal S. Early formation of Streptococcus sobrinus biofilm on various dental restorative materials. J Dent 30 (2002) 47-51
5. Auschill T.M., Arweiler N.B., Brecx M., Reich E., Sculean A., and Netuschil L. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci 110 (2002) 48-53
6. Montanaro L., Campoccia D., Rizzi S., Donati M.E., Breschi L., Prati C., and Arciola C.R. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. Biomaterials 25 (2004) 4457-4463
7. Liljemark W.F., and Bloomquist C. Human oral microbial ecology and dental caries and periodontal diseases. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 7 (1996) 180-198
8. Gaines S., James T.C., Folan M., Baird A.W., and O'Farrelly C. A novel spectrofluorometric microassay for Streptococcus mutans adherence to hydroxylapatite. J Microbiol Methods 54 (2003) 315-323
9. Ikeda M., Matin K., Nikaido T., Foxton R.M., and Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J 26 (2007) 915-923
10. Blank J.T. Scientifically based rationale and protocol for use of modern indirect resin inlays and onlays. J Esthet Dent 12 (2000) 195-208
11. Small B.W. Material choice for restorative dentistry: inlays, onlays, crowns, and bridges. Gen Dent 54 (2006) 310-312
12. Tezvergil-Mutluay A., Lassila L.V., and Vallittu P.K. Degree of conversion of dual-cure luting resins light-polymerized through various materials. Acta Odontol Scand 65 (2007) 201-205
13. Peutzfeldt A., and Asmussen E. The effect of postcuring on quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resins composites. J Dent 28 (2000) 447-452
14. Eick S., Glockmann E., Brandl B., and Pfister W. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. J Oral Rehabil 31 (2004) 278-285
15. Siegrist B.E., Brecx M.C., Gusberti F.A., Joss A., and Lang N.P. In vivo early human dental plaque formation on different supporting substances. A scanning electron microscopic and bacteriological study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2 (1991) 38-46
16. Hahn R., Weiger R., Netuschil L., and Brüch M. Microbial accumulation and vitality on different restorative materials. Dent Mater 9 (1993) 312-316
17. Adamczyk E., and Spiechowicz E. Plaque accumulation on crowns made of various materials. Int J Prosthodont 3 (1990) 285-291
18. Hansel C., Leyhausen G., Mai U.E., and Geurtsen W. Effects of various resin composite (co)monomers and extracts on two caries-associated micro-organisms in vitro. J Dent Res 77 (1998) 60-67
19. Kawai K., and Takaoka T. Inhibition of bacterial and glucan adherence to various light-cured fluoride-releasing restorative materials. J Dent 29 (2001) 119-122
20. Quirynen M. The clinical meaning of the surface roughness and the surface free energy of intra-oral hard substrata on the microbiology of the supra- and subgingival plaque: results of in vitro and in vivo experiments. J Dent 22 Suppl 1 (1994) S13-S16
21. Kawai K., Urano M., and Ebisu S. Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. J Prosthet Dent 83 (2000) 664-667
22. Carlén A., Nikdel K., Wennerberg A., Holmberg K., and Olsson J. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials 22 (2001) 481-487
23. Kou W., Molin M., and Sjögren G. Surface roughness of five different dental ceramic core materials after grinding and polishing. J Oral Rehabil 33 (2006) 117-124
24. Wright M.D., Masri R., Driscoll C.F., Romberg E., Thompson G.A., and Runyan D.A. Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 92 (2004) 486-490
25. Jung M., Wehlen O., and Klimek J. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 131-141
26. Klausner L.H., Cartwright C.B., and Charbeneau G.T. Polished versus autoglazed porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 47 (1982) 157-162
27. Hulterström A.K., and Bergman M. Polishing systems for dental ceramics. Acta Odontol Scand 51 (1993) 229-234
28. Quirynen M., and Bollen C.M. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 22 (1995) 1-14
29. Tholt de Vasconcellos B., Miranda-Júnior W.G., Prioli R., Thompson J., and Oda M. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer. Oper Dent 31 (2006) 442-449
30. Sasahara R.M., Ribeiro Fda C., Cesar P.F., and Yoshimura H.N. Influence of the finishing technique on surface roughness of dental porcelains with different microstructures. Oper Dent 31 (2006) 577-583
31. Goldstein R.E. Finishing of composites and laminates. Dent Clin North Am 33 (1989) 305-318 210-9.
32. Martínez-Gomis J., Bizar J., Anglada J.M., Samsó J., and Peraire M. Comparative evaluation of four finishing systems on one ceramic surface. Int J Prosthodont 16 (2003) 74-77
33. Hahnel S., Rosentritt M., Bürgers R., and Handel G. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans NCTC 10449 to artificial teeth: an in-vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 100 (2008) 309-315
34. Imazato S., Ebi N., Takahashi Y., Kaneko T., Ebisu S., and Russell R.R. Antibacterial activity of bactericide-immobilized filler for resin-based restoratives. Biomaterials 24 (2003) 3605-3609
35. Takahashi Y., Imazato S., Russell R.R., Noiri Y., and Ebisu S. Influence of resin monomers on growth of oral streptococci. J Dent Res 83 (2004) 302-306
36. Blake-Haskins J.C., Mellberg J.R., and Snyder C. Effect of calcium in model plaque on the anticaries activity of fluoride in vitro. J Dent Res 71 (1992) 1482-1486
37. Preetha A., and Banerjee R. Comparison of artificial saliva substitutes. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 18 (2005) 178-186