Inhibition of bacterial and glucan adherence to various light-cured fluoride-releasing restorative materials

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 119-122

  Kawai, K ^a   Takaoka, T ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cariogenic bacteria; Compomer; Contact angle; Fluoride; Glucan; Plaque; Resin modified glass ionomer

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; COMPOMER; DYRACT; FLUORIDE; FUJI II LC CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; GLUCAN; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PHOTAC FIL; PHOTAC-FIL; RESIN; SILICATE; TETRIC; VARIGLASS VLC; VITREMER;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG EFFECT; MATERIALS TESTING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STREPTOCOCCUS SOBRINUS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PLAQUE; WETTABILITY;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADHESIONS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL PLAQUE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FLUORIDES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; GLUCANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILICATES; STREPTOCOCCUS SOBRINUS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WETTABILITY;

EID: 0035260580     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00059-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Erickson R, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite resin systems. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 1994;6:227-44.
2. Hume WR, Mount GJ. In vitro studies on the potential for pulpal cytotoxicity of glass ionomer cements. Journal of Dental Research 1988;67:915-8.
3. Ten Cate JM, Van Duinen RN. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. Journal of Dental Research 1995;74:1266-71.
4. Mclean JW. Dentinal bonding agents versus glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence International 1996;27:659-67.
5. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou-Koubia E, Papadogiannis Y. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations. Operative Dentistry 1994;19:183-8.
6. Tam Le, Chan G P-L, Yim D. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Operative Dentistry 1997;22:4-14.
7. Hallgren A, Oliveby A, Twetman S. Caries associated microflora in plaque from orthodontic appliances retained with glass ionomer cement. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1992;100:140-3.
8. Chung CK, Millett DT, Creanor SL, Gilmour WH, Foye RH. Fluoride release and cariostatic ability of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement used for orthodontic bonding. Journal of Dentistry 1998;26:533-8.
9. Scherer W, Lippman N, Kaim J. Antimicrobial properties of glass-ionomer cements and other restorative materials. Operative Dentistry 1989;14:77-81.
10. De Schepper EJ, White RR, Von Der Lehr W. Antibacterial effects of glass ionomers. American Journal of Dentistry 1989;2:51-56.
11. Svanberg M, Mjor IA, Ørstavik D. Mutans Streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. Journal of Dental Research 1990;69:861-4.
12. Palenik CJ, Behnen MJ, Setcos JC, Miller CH. Inhibition of microbial adherence and growth by various glass ionomers in vitro. Dental Materials 1992;8:16-20.
13. Van Pelt AWJ, Weerkamp AH, Uyen MHWJC, Busscher HJ, De Jong HP, Arends J. Adhesion of Streptococcus sanguis CH3 to polymers with different surface free energies. Applied Environmental Microbiology 1985;49:1270-5.
14. Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL, Cury JA. In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Research 1993;27:280-4.
15. Musa A, Pearson GJ, Gelbier M. In vitro investigation of fluoride ion release from four resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cements. Biomaterials 1996;17:1019-23.
16. Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, Van Wyk Kotze TJ. A comparison of fluoride release from various dental materials. Journal of Dentistry 1998;26:259-65.
17. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials 1998;19:503-8.
18. Verbeeck RMH, Maeyer EAP, Marks LAM, De Moor RJG, De Witte AMJC, Trimpeneers LM. Fluoride release process of (resin-modified) glass-ionomer cements versus (polyacid-modified) composite resins. Biomaterials 1998;19:509-19.
19. Attin T, Buchalla W, Siewert C, Hellwig E. Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1999;26:388-93.
20. Van Dijken JW, Kalfas S, Litra V, Oliveby A. Fluoride and mutans streptococci levels in plaque on aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, compomer and resin composite. Caries Research 1997;31:379-83.
21. Kawai K, Tantbirojrn D, Kamalawat AS, Hasegawa T, Retief DH. In vitro enamel and cementum fluoride uptake from three fluoride-containing composites. Caries Research 1998;32:463-9.
22. Kawai K, Heaven TJ, Retief DH. In vitro dentine fluoride uptake from three fluoride-containing composites and their acid resistance. Journal of Dentistry 1997;25:291-6.
23. Tantbirojrn D, Douglas WH, Versluis A. Inhibitive effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on remote enamel artificial caries. Caries Research 1997;31:275-80.
24. Millar BJ, Abiden F, Nicholson JW. In vitro caries inhibition by polyacid-modified composite resins ('compomers'). Journal of Dentistry 1998;26:133-6.