Comparative evaluation of four finishing systems on one ceramic surface

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 74-77

  Martínez Gomis, Jordi ^a   Bizar, Josep ^a   Anglada, Josep Maria ^b   Samsó, Jordi ^a   Peraire, Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAMOND; SILICON DERIVATIVE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; RUBBER; SILICON;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PARAMETER; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROCESS DESIGN; RANDOMIZATION; SAMPLE; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; OINTMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CERAMICS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLISHING; DIAMOND; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; OINTMENTS; RUBBER; SILICON; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 17544396115     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Metzler KT, Woody RD, Miller AW III, Miller BH. In vitro investigation of the wear of human enamel by dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:356-364.
2. Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res 1991;70:221-225.
3. Jacobi R, Shillingburg HT, Duncanson MG. A comparison of the abrasiveness of six ceramic surfaces and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:303-309.
4. Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of unglazed, glazed and polished porcelain on human enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:320-323.
5. Al-Wahadni AM, Martin DM. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of glazed, unglazed and refinished dental porcelain on an opposing material. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:538-546.
6. Quirynen M, Bollen CML. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1-14.
7. Bollen CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention. A review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-269.
8. Campbell SD. Evaluation of surface roughness and polishing techniques for new ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:563-568.
9. Fuzzi M, Zaccheroni Z, Vallania G. Scanning electron microscopy and profilometer evaluation of glazed and polished dental porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:452-458.
10. Patterson CJW, McLundie AC, Stirrups DR, Taylor WG. Efficacy of a porcelain refinishing system in restoring surface finish after grinding with fine and extra-fine diamond burs. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:402-406.
11. Scurria MS, Powers JM. Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:174-177.
12. Ward MT, Tate WH, Powers JM. Surface roughness of opalescent porcelains after polishing. Oper Dent 1995;20:106-110.
13. Hulterström AK, Bergman M. Polishing systems for dental ceramics. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:229-234.
14. Whitehead SA, Shearer AC, Watts DC, Wilson NHF. Comparison of methods for measuring surface roughness of ceramic. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:421-427.
15. Goldstein GR, Barnhard BR, Penugonda B. Profilometer, SEM, and visual assessment of porcelain polishing methods. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:627-634.
16. Patterson CJW, McLundie AC, Stirrups DR, Taylor WG. Refinishing of porcelain by using a refinishing kit. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:383-388.
17. Haywood VB, Heymann HO, Scurria MS. Effects of water, speed, and experimental instrumentation on finishing and polishing porcelain intra-orally. Dent Mater 1989;5:185-188.