Mix-ratio sampling: Classifying multiclass imbalanced mouse brain images using support vector machine

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 4955-4965

  Bae, Min Hyeok ^a   Wu, Teresa ^a   Pan, Rong ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain image segmentation; Data mining; Imbalanced dataset; Multiclass classification; Sampling procedure; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

BRAIN IMAGES; IMBALANCED DATASET; MULTI-CLASS CLASSIFICATION; SAMPLING PROCEDURE; SAMPLING PROCEDURES; SEGMENTATION DATA;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); CLASSIFIERS; DIGITAL IMAGE STORAGE; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORKS; RESONANCE; VECTORS;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 77950187695     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.018     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abe S. Support vector machines for pattern classification (advances in pattern recognition) (2005), Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ
2. Akbani R., Kwek S., and Japkowicz N. Applying support vector machines to imbalanced datasets. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3201 (2004) 39-50
3. Ali A.A., Dale A.M., Badea A., and Johnson G.A. Automated segmentation of neuroanatomical structures in multispectral MR microscopy of the mouse brain. NeuroImage 27 2 (2005) 425-435
4. Busatto G.F., Garridob G.E.J., Almeidac O.P., Castrod C.C., Camargoa C.H.P., Cida C.G., et al. A voxel-based morphometry study of temporal lobe gray matter reductions in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiology of Aging 24 2 (2003) 221-231
5. Chang, C., & Lin, C. (2001). LIBSVM : A library for support vector machines. Software available at .
6. Chaplot S., Patnaik L.M., and Jagannathan N.R. Classification of magnetic resonance brain images using wavelets as input to support vector machine and neural network. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 1 (2006) 86-92
7. Chawla N.V., Bowyer K.W., Hall L.O., and Kegelmeyer W.P. SMOTE: Synthetic minority oversampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 16 (2002) 321-357
8. Evans A.C., Kamber M., Collins D.L., and MacDonald D. An MRI-based probabilistic atlas of neuroanatomy. Magnetic resonance scanning and epilepsy (1994), Plenum Press, New York pp. 263-274
9. Fischl B., Salat D.H., Busa E., Albert M., Dieterich M., Haselgrove C., et al. Whole brain segmentation: Automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33 (2002) 341-355
10. Hartmann S.L., Parks M.H., Martin P.R., and Dawant B.M. Automatic 3D segmentation of internal structures of the head in MR images using a combination of similarity and free-form transformations: Part I, validation on severely atrophied brains. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18 (1999) 917-926
11. Heckemann R.A., Hajnal J.V., Aljabar P., Rueckert D., and Hammers A. Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. NeuroImage 33 (2006) 115-126
12. Hsu C.W., and Lin C.J. A comparison of methods for multi-class support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 13 (2002) 415-425
13. Iosifescu D.V., Shenton M.E., Warfield S.K., Kikinis R., Dengler J., Jolesz F.A., et al. An automated registration algorithm for measuring MRI subcortical brain structures. NeuroImage 6 (1997) 1, 13-2
14. Japkowicz, N. (2000). The class imbalance problem: Significance and strategies. In Proceedings of the 2000 international conference on artificial intelligence (IC-AI'2000): Special track on inductive learning, Las Vegas, Nevada.
15. Li, C. (2007). Classifying imbalanced data using a bagging ensemble variation (BEV). In Proceedings of the 45th annual southeast regional conference (pp. 203-208).
16. Ling C., and Li C. Data mining for direct marketing problems and solutions. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD-98) (1998), AAAI Press, New York
17. Luts J., Heerschap A., Suykens J.A.K., and Huffel S.V. A combined MRI and MRSI based multiclass system for brain tumour recognition using LS-SVMs with class probabilities and feature selection. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 40 (2007) 87-102
18. Magnotta V.A., Heckel D., Andreasen N.C., Cizadlo T., Corson P.W., Ehrhardt J.C., et al. Measurement of brain structures with artificial neural networks: Two- and three-dimensional applications. Radiology 211 3 (1999) 781-790
19. Mourao-Miranda J., Bokde A.L.W., Born C., Hampel H., and Stetter M. Classifying brain states and determining the discriminating activation patterns: Support vector machine on functional MRI data. NeuroImage 28 (2005) 980-995
20. Nattkempera T.W., Arnricha B., Lichtea O., Timma W., Degenhardb A., Pointonc L., et al. Evaluation of radiological features for breast tumour classification in clinical screening with machine learning methods. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 34 (2005) 129-139
21. Powell S., Magnotta V.A., Johnson H., Jammalamadaka V.K., Pierson R., and Andreasen N.C. Registration and machine learning-based automated segmentation of subcortical and cerebellar brain structures. NeuroImage 39 (2008) 238-247
22. Reddick W.E., Glass J.O., Cook E.N., Elkin T.D., and Deaton R.J. Automated segmentation and classification of multispectral magnetic resonance images of brain using artificial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 16 (1997) 6, 911-91
23. Sharief A.A., Badea A., Dale A.M., and Johnson G.A. Automated segmentation of the actively stained mouse brain using multi-spectral MR microscopy. NeuroImage 39 (2008) 136-145
24. Shin H., and Cho S. Response modeling with support vector machines. Expert Systems with Applications 30 (2006) 746-760
25. Thompson P.M., and Toga A.W. A surface-based technique for warping 3-dimensional images of the brain. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 15 (1996) 1-16
26. Veropoulos, K., Campbell, C., & Cristianini, N. (1999). Controlling the sensitivity of support vector machines. In Proceedings of the international joint conference on AI (pp. 55-60).
27. Wu G., and Chang E.Y. KBA: Kernel boundary alignment considering imbalanced data distribution. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17 6 (2005) 786-795