Molecular dynamics simulation at high sodium chloride concentration: Toward the inactive conformation of the human adenosine A2A receptor

Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Volumn 1, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1008-1013

  Jójárt, Balázs ^a   Kiss, Róbert ^b   Viskolcz, Béla ^a   Kolossváry, István ^c,e   Keseru, György M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^b HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^d GEDEON RICHTER LTD   (Hungary)

^e D E SHAW RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Biophysical chemistry

Indexed keywords

BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; INTRACELLULAR SIDE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; PHYSIOLOGICAL CONCENTRATIONS; SOLVED CRYSTAL STRUCTURES; STABILIZATION EFFECTS; TRANSMEMBRANE HELICES;

CEMENTS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS);

EID: 77950185608     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19487185     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jz900403a     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Palczewski, K.; Kumasaka, T.; Hori, T.; Behnke, C. A.; Motoshima, H.; Fox, B. A.; Le Trong, I.; Teller, D. C.; Okada, T.; Stenkamp, R. E.; Yamamoto, M.; Miyano, M. Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G Protein-Coupled Receptor. Science 2000, 289, 739-745.
2. Cherezov, V.; Rosenbaum, D. M.; Hanson, M. A.; Rasmussen, S. G.; Thian, F. S.; Kobilka, T. S.; Choi, H. J.; Kuhn, P.; Weis, W. I.; Kobilka, B. K.; Stevens, R. C. High-Resolution Crystal Structure of an Engineered Human?2-Adrenergic G Protein-Coupled Receptor. Science 2007, 318, 1258-1265.
3. Warne, T.; Serrano-Vega, M. J.; Baker, J. G.; Moukhametzianov, R.; Edwards, P. C.; Henderson, R.; Leslie, A. G.; Tate, C. G.; Schertler, G. F. Structure of a?1-Adrenergic G-Protein-Coupled Receptor. Nature 2008, 454, 486-491.
4. Jaakola, V. P.; Griffith, M. T.; Hanson, M. A.; Cherezov, V.; Chien, E. Y.; Lane, J. R.; Ijzerman, A. P.; Stevens, R. C. The 2.6 Angstrom Crystal Structure of a Human A2A Adenosine Receptor Bound to an Antagonist. Science 2008, 322, 1211-1217.
5. Mobarec, J. C.; Sanchez, R.; Filizola, M. Modern Homology Modeling of G-Protein Coupled Receptors: Which Structural Template to Use? J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 5207-5216.
6. Ballesteros, J. A; Weinstein, H. Integrated Methods for the Construction of Three-Dimensional Models and Computational Probing of Structure-Function Relations in G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Methods Neurosci. 1995, 25, 366-428.
7. de Ligta, R. A. F.; Rivkeesb, S. A.; Lorenzenc, A.; Leursd, R.; IJzermana, A. P. A "Locked-On," Constitutively Active Mutant of the Adenosine A1 Receptor. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 510, 1-8.
8. Gao, Z. G.; Kim, S. K.; Gross, A. S.; Chen, A.; Blaustein, J. B.; Jacobson, K. A. Identification of Essential Residues Involved in the Allosteric Modulation of the Human A(3) Adenosine Receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 2003, 63, 1021-1031.
9. Farrens, D. L.; Altenbach, C.; Yang, K.; Hubbell, W. L.; Khorana, H. G. Requirement of Rigid-Body Motion of Transmembrane Helices for Light Activation of Rhodopsin. Science 1996, 274, 768-770.
10. Park, J. H.; Scheerer, P.; Hofmann, K. P.; Choe, H. W.; Ernst, O. P. Crystal Structure of the Ligand-Free G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Opsin. Nature 2008, 454, 183-187.
11. Scheerer, P.; Park, J. H.; Hildebrand, P. W.; Kim, Y. J.; Krauss, N.; Choe, H.W.; Hofmann, K. P.; Ernst, O. P. Crystal Structure of the Active G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Opsin in Complex with a C-Terminal Peptide Derived from the G-R Subunit of Transducin. Nature 2008, 455, 497-502.
12. Dror, R. O.; Arlow, D. H.; Borhani, D.W.; Jensen, M. Ø.; Piana, S.; Shaw, D. E. Identification of Two Distinct Inactive Conformations of the?2-Adrenergic Receptor Reconciles Structural and Biochemical Observations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 4689-4694.
13. Frishman, D.; Argos, P. Knowledge-Based Secondary Structure Assignment. Proteins 1995, 23, 566-579.
14. De Lean, A.; Stadel, J. M.; Lefkowitz, R. J. ATernary Complex Model Explains the Agonist-Specific Binding Properties of the Adenylate Cyclase-Coupled?-Adrenergic Receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255, 7108-7117.
15. Limbird, L. E. Receptors Linked to Inhibition of Adenylate Cyclase: Additional Signaling Mechanisms. FASEB J. 1988, 2, 2686-2695.
16. Pert, C. B.; Pasternak, G. W.; Snyder, S. H. Opiate Agonists and Antagonists Discriminated by Receptor Binding in Brain. Science 1973, 182, 1359-1361.
17. Urwyler, S. Mono-and Divalent Cations Modulate the Affinities of Brain D1 and D2 Receptors for Dopamine by a Mechanism Independent of Receptor Coupling to Guanyl Nucleotide Binding Proteins. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 1989, 339, 374-382.
18. Nunnari, J. M.; Repaske, M. G.; Brandon, S.; Cragoe, E. J., Jr.; Limbird, L. E. Regulation of Porcine Brain R2-Adrenergic Receptors by Na\+, H\+ and Inhibitors of Na\+/H\+ Exchange. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 12387-12392.
19. Jungwirth, P.; Winter, B. Ions at Aqueous Interfaces: From-Water Surface to Hydrated Proteins. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2008, 59, 343-366
20. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nuc. Acid. Res. 2000, 28, 23]5-242.
21. Berman, H. M.; Henrick, K.; Nakamura, H. Announcing the Worldwide Protein Data Bank. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003, 10, 980.
22. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE 2007.09); C.C.G., Inc: Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
23. Jojart, B.; Marki,A. Comparative Study of Eight Oxytocin Antagonists by Simulated Annealing. J. Mol. Model. 2006, 12, 823-828.
24. MacKerell, A. D.Jr.; Bashford, D.; Bellott, M.; Dunbrack, R. L., Jr.; Evanseck, J. D.; Field, M. J.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Guo, H.; Ha, S.; et al. All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 3586-3616.
25. http://Www.deshawresearch.com/resources-desmond.html (accessed September 1, 2008).
26. Bowers, K. J.; Chow, E.; Xu, H.; Dror, R. O.; Eastwood, M. P.; Gregersen, B. A.; Klepeis, J. L.; Kolossv-ary, I.; Moraes, M. A.; Sacerdoti, F. D.; Salmon, J. K.; Shan, Y.; Shaw, D. E. Scalable Algorithms for Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Commodity Clusters. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC06), Tampa, Florida, November 11-17, 2006.
27. Caves, L. S. D.; Evanseck, J. D.; Karplus,M. Locally Accessible Conformations of Proteins: Multiple Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Crambin. Protein Sci. 1998, 7, 649-666.
28. MacKerell, A. D.Jr.; Feig, M.; Brooks, C. L.III. Extending the Treatment of Backbone Energetics in Protein Force Fields: Limitations of Gas-Phase Quantum Mechanics in Reproducing Protein Conformational Distributions in Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1400-1415.
29. Jorgensen, W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R.W.; Klein, M. L. Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926-935.
30. Beglov, D.; Roux, B. Finite Representation of an Infinite Bulk System: Solvent Boundary Potential for Computer Simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 9050-9063.
31. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; DiNola, A.; Haak, J. R. Molecular Dynamics with Coupling to an External Bath. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 3684-3690.
32. Essman, U.; Perera, L.; Berkowitz, M. L.; Darden, T.; Lee, H.; Pedersen, L. G. A Smooth Particle Mesh Ewald Method. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 8577-8593.
33. Humphrey,W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD-Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 33-38.