Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty

American Heart Journal

Volumn 159, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 518-531

  Biancari, Fausto ^a,b   D'Andrea, Vito ^a,b   Di Marco, Carlo ^a,b   Savino, Grazia ^a,b   Tiozzo, Valentina ^a,b   Catania, Antonio ^a,b  

^a OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOSEAL; ARTERY PUNCTURE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; C CLAMP; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DUETT; EVS; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMOSTOP; HEMATOMA; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; LEG ISCHEMIA; META ANALYSIS; PERCLOSE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTAR; REVIEW; STARCLOSE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TECHSTAR; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE; VASOSEAL; X PRESS;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGIOPLASTY; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 77950126171     PISSN: 00028703     EISSN: 10976744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.027     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Vaiktus P.T. A meta-analysis of percutaneous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 16 (2004) 243-246
2. Koreny M., Riedmuller E., Nikfardjam M., et al. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual catheterization. Systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 291 (2004) 350-357
3. Biancari F., Ylönen K., Mosorin M., et al. Lower limb complications after the use of arterial puncture closure devices. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32 (2006) 504-505
4. Michalis L.K., Rees M.R., Patsouras D., et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of three commercially available closure devices (Angioseal, Vasoseal and Duett). Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 25 (2002) 423-429
5. Shammas N.W., Rajendran V.R., Alldredge S.G., et al. Randomized comparison of VasoSeal and AngioSeal closure devices in patients undergoing coronary angiography and angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 55 (2002) 421-425
6. Veasey R.A., Large J.K., Silberbauer J., et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing StarClose and AngioSeal vascular closure devices in a district general hospital: the SCOAT study. Int J Clin Pract 62 (2008) 912-918
7. Higgins J.P.T., and Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.1 (2008), The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org
8. Amin F.R., Yousufuddin M., Stables R., et al. Femoral haemostasis after transcatheter therapeutic intervention: a prospective randomised study of the Angio-seal device vs. the Femostop device. Int J Cardiol 76 (2000) 235-240
9. Baim D.S., Knopf W.D., Hinohara T., et al. Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: results of the suture to ambulate and discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials. Am J Cardiol 85 (2000) 864-869
10. Behan M.W.H., Large J.K., Patel N.R., et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing the routine use of an Angio-Seal STS device strategy with conventional femoral haemostasis methods in a district general hospital. Int J Clin Pract 61 (2007) 367-372
11. Deuling J.H., Vermeulen R.P., Anthonio R.A., et al. Closure of the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of Angio-Seal, StarClose, and manual compression. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71 (2008) 518-523
12. Gerckens U., Cattelaens N., Lampe E.G., et al. Management of arterial puncture site after catheterization procedures: evaluating a suture-mediated closure device. Am J Cardiol 83 (1999) 1658-1663
13. Hermiller J.B., Simonton C., Hinohara T., et al. The StarClose vascular closure system: interventional results from the CLIP study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68 (2006) 677-683
14. Jensen J., Saleh N., Jensen U., et al. The inflammatory response to femoral arterial closure devices: a randomized comparison among FemoStop, AngioSeal, and Perclose. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 31 (2008) 751-755
15. Juergens C.P., Leung D.Y., Crozier J.A., et al. Patient tolerance and resource utilization associated with an arterial closure versus an external compression device after percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63 (2004) 166-170
16. Kussmaul III W.G., Buchbinder M., Whitlow P.L., et al. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol 25 (1995) 1685-1892
17. Martin J.L., Pratsos A., Magargee E., et al. A randomized trial comparing compression, Perclose Proglide and Angio-Seal VIP for arterial closure following percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAP trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71 (2008) 1-5
18. Silber S., Björvik A., Mühling H., et al. Usefulness of collagen plugging with VasoSeal after PTCA as compared to manual compression with identical sheath dwell times. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 43 (1998) 421-427
19. Starnes B.W., O'Donnell S.D., Gillespie D.L., et al. Percutaneous arterial closure in peripheral vascular disease: a prospective randomized evaluation of the Perclose device. J Vasc Surg 38 (2003) 263-271
20. Tron C., Koning R., Eltchaninoff H., et al. A randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after PTCA. J Interv Cardiol 16 (2003) 217-221
21. Upponi S.S., Ganeshan A.G., Warakaulle D.R., et al. Angioseal versus manual compression for haemostasis following peripheral vascular diagnostic and interventional procedures: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Radiol 61 (2007) 332-334
22. Reddy B.K., Brewster P.S., Walsh T., et al. Randomized comparison of rapid ambulation using radial, 4 French femoral access, or femoral access with AngioSeal closure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62 (2004) 143-149
23. Rickli H., Unterweger M., Sütsch G., et al. Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57 (2002) 297-302
24. Sanborn T.A., Gibbs H.H., Brinker J.A., et al. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 22 (1993) 1273-1279
25. Sanborn T.A., Ogilby J.D., Ritter J.M., et al. Reduced vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions with a nonmechanical suture device: results from the randomized RACE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 61 (2004) 327-332
26. Schräder R., Steinbacher S., Burger W., et al. Collagen application for sealing of arterial puncture sites in comparison to pressure dressing: a randomized trial. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 27 (1992) 298-302
27. Slaughter P.M., Chetty R., Flintoft V.F., et al. A single center randomized trial assessing use of a vascular hemostasis device vs. conventional manual compression following PTCA: what are the potential resource savings?. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 34 (1995) 210-214
28. von Hoch F., Neumann F.J., Theiss W., et al. Efficacy and safety of collagen implants for haemostasis of the vascular access site after coronary balloon angioplasty and coronary stent implantation. A randomized study. Eur Heart J 16 (1995) 640-646
29. Wetter D.R., Rickli H., von Smekal A., et al. Early sheath removal after coronary artery interventions with use of a suture-mediated closure device: clinical outcome and results of Doppler US evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11 (2000) 1033-1037
30. Seidelin P.H., and Adelman A.G. Mobilization within thirty minutes of elective diagnostic coronary angiography: a feasibility study using a hemostatic femoral puncture closure device. J Interv Cardiol 10 (1997) 409-415
31. Ward S.R., Casale P., Raymond R., et al. Efficacy and safety of a hemostatic puncture closure device with early ambulation after coronary angiography. Angio-Seal Investigators. Am J Cardiol 81 (1998) 569-572
32. Chevalier B., Lancelin B., Koning R., et al. Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high-local-risk patients: results of a randomized multicenter trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 58 (2003) 285-291
33. Noguchi T., Miyazaki S., Yasuda S., et al. A randomised controlled trial of Prostar Plus for haemostasis in patients after coronary angioplasty. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 19 (2000) 451-455
34. Ellis S., and and the SEAL Trial Study Team. Assessment of the safety and efficacy of the DUETT vascular hemostasis device: final results of the safe and effective vascular hemostasis (SEAL) trial. Am Heart J 143 (2002) 612-619
35. Ansel G., Yakubov S., Neilsen C., et al. Safety and efficacy of staple-mediated femoral arteriotomy closure: results from a randomized multicenter study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67 (2006) 546-553
36. Camenzind E., Grossholz M., Urban P., et al. Collagen application versus manual compression: a prospective randomized trial for arterial puncture site closure after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 24 (1994) 655-662
37. Carere R.G., Webb J.G., Buller C.E., et al. Suture closure of femoral arterial puncture sites after coronary angioplasty followed by same-day discharge. Am Heart J 139 1 Pt 1 (2000) 52-58
38. Gwechenberger M., Katzenschlager R., Heinz G., et al. Use of a collagen plug versus manual compression for sealing arterial puncture site after cardiac catheterization. Angiology 48 (1997) 121-126
39. Resnic F.S., Arora N., Matheny M., et al. A cost-minimization analysis of the Angio-Seal vascular closure device following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 99 (2007) 766-770
40. Jolly S.S., Amlani S., Hamon M., et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 157 (2009) 132-140