A randomised controlled trial of Prostar Plus(TM) for haemostasis in patients after coronary angioplasty

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 451-455

  Noguchi, T ^a   Miyazaki, S ^a   Yasuda, S ^a   Baba, T ^a   Sumida, H ^a   Morii, I ^a   Daikoku, S ^a   Goto, Y ^a   Nonogi, H ^a  

^a NATIONAL CEREBRAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Catheterisation; Complications; Percutaneous vascular surgical device

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; HEPARIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DILATATION; FEMALE; HEMOSTASIS; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAFETY; STENT; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

EID: 0034193750     PISSN: 10785884     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.1071     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Popma J.J., Satler L.F., Pichard AD et al. Vascular complications after balloon and new device angioplasty. Circulation. 88:1993;1569-1578.
2. Moscucci M., Mansour K.A., Kent C et al. Peripheral vascular complications of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting: Predictors, management, and outcome. Am J Cardiol. 74:1994;448-453.
3. Franco C.D., Goldsmith J., Veith FJ et al. Management of arterial injuries produced by percutaneous femoral procedures. Surgery. 113:1993;419-425.
4. TMA new device for percutaneous suture-mediated closure of arterial puncture sites. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 37:1996;367-372.
5. Schrader R., Steinbacher S., Burger W et al. Collagen application for sealing of arterial puncture sites in comparison to pressure dressing: A randomized trial. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 27:1992;298-302.
6. Sanborn T.A., Brinker J.A., Kosinski EJ et al. Reduced compression time using a vascular haemostasis device after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty: A multi-centered randomized trial. Circulation. 86:1992;I-372.
7. Slaughter P.M., Chetty R., Flintoft VF et al. A single-center randomized trial assessing use of a vascular hemostasis device vs. conventional manual compression following PTCA: What are the potential resource savings? Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 34:1995;210-214.
8. Bartolleri A.L., Sganzerla P., Fabbiocchi F et al. Prompt and safe femoral hemostasis with a collagen device after intraÍcoronary implantation of Palmaz-Schatz stents. Am Heart J. 130:1995;26-32.
9. Vetter J.W., Riero E.E., Hinohara T et al. Suture-mediated percutaneous closure of femoral of femoral artery access sites in fully anticoagulated patients following coronary interventions [abstract]. Circulation. 90 (Suppl. I):1994;I-621.
10. Haener W., Schuleze R., Ludwig B. A new percutaneous vascular surgical device after PTCA and stenting [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 27 (Suppl. A):1996;393A.
11. Baim D., Pinkerton C., Schatz R et al. Acute results of the STAND II percutaneous vascular surgical device trial [abstract]. Circulation. 96 (Suppl. I):1997;I-442.
12. Schatz R.A., Baim D.S., Leon M et al. Clinical experience with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent: Initial results of a multicenter study. Circulation. 83:1991;148-161.
13. Sanborn T.A., Gibbs H.H., Brinker J et al. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 22:1993;1273-1279.
14. Huskisson E.C. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 2:1974;1127-1131.