A murine model of contact lens-associated fusarium keratitis

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1511-1516

  Sun, Yan ^a   Chandra, Jyotsna ^b   Mukherjee, Pranab ^b   Szczotka Flynn, Loretta ^a   Ghannoum, Mahmoud A ^b   Pearlman, Eric ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERLEUKIN 1 RECEPTOR; MYELOID DIFFERENTIATION FACTOR 88; SILICONE; TOLL LIKE RECEPTOR 2; TOLL LIKE RECEPTOR 4; CXCL1 CHEMOKINE; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; LOTRAFILCON A; MYD88 PROTEIN, MOUSE; SILICONE DERIVATIVE; TLR4 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; ARTICLE; BIOFILM; C57BL 6 MOUSE; CELL COUNT; CELL INFILTRATION; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; CORNEA OPACITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FUNGUS GROWTH; FUNGUS HYPHAE; FUNGUS ISOLATION; FUSARIOSIS; FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HYDROGEL; KERATOMYCOSIS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; BACTERIAL COUNT; C57BL MOUSE; CORNEA ULCER; DISEASE MODEL; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FUNGAL EYE INFECTION; FUSARIUM; INNATE IMMUNITY; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; MYCOSIS; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOFILMS; CHEMOKINE CXCL1; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; CONTACT LENSES; CORNEAL OPACITY; CORNEAL ULCER; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; EYE INFECTIONS, FUNGAL; FUSARIUM; HYDROGELS; IMMUNITY, INNATE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MYCOSES; MYELOID DIFFERENTIATION FACTOR 88; RECEPTORS, INTERLEUKIN-1; SILICONES; TOLL-LIKE RECEPTOR 4;

EID: 77949895195     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4237     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bharathi MJ, Ramakrishnan R, Meenakshi R, Padmavathy S, Shivakumar C, Srinivasan M. Microbial keratitis in South India: influence of risk factors, climate, and geographical variation. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007;14:61-69.
2. Chowdhary A, Singh K. Spectrum of fungal keratitis in North India. Cornea. 2005;24:8-15.
3. Xie L, Zhong W, Shi W, Sun S. Spectrum of fungal keratitis in north China. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1943-1948.
4. Alfonso EC, Cantu-Dibildox J, Munir WM, et al. Insurgence of Fusarium keratitis associated with contact lens wear. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:941-947.
5. Alfonso EC, Miller D, Cantu-Dibildox J, O'Brien TP, Schein OD. Fungal keratitis associated with non-therapeutic soft contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:154-155.
6. Khor WB, Aung T, Saw SM, et al. An outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with contact lens wear in Singapore. JAMA. 2006;295: 2867-2873.
7. Saw SM, Ooi PL, Tan DT, et al. Risk factors for contact lens-related fusarium keratitis: a case-control study in Singapore. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:611-617.
8. Gaujoux T, Chatel MA, Chaumeil C, Laroche L, Borderie VM. Outbreak of contact lens-related Fusarium keratitis in France. Cornea. 2008;27:1018-1021.
9. Ma SK, So K, Chung PH, Tsang HF, Chuang SK. A multi-country outbreak of fungal keratitis associated with a brand of contact lens solution: the Hong Kong experience. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13:443-448.
10. Chang DC, Grant GB, O'Donnell K, et al. Multistate outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with use of a contact lens solution. JAMA. 2006;296:953-963.
11. Grant GB, Fridkin S, Chang DC, Park BJ. Postrecall surveillance following a multistate fusarium keratitis outbreak: 2004 through 2006. JAMA. 2007;298:2867-2868.
12. Ahearn DG, Simmons RB, Zhang S, et al. Attachment to and penetration of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses by Fusarium solani and Ulocladium sp. in vitro. Cornea. 2007;26:831-839.
13. Ahearn DG, Zhang S, Stulting RD, et al. Fusarium keratitis and contact lens wear: facts and speculations. Med Mycol. 2008;46:397-410.
14. Dyavaiah M, Ramani R, Chu DS, et al. Molecular characterization, biofilm analysis and experimental biofouling study of Fusarium isolates from recent cases of fungal keratitis in New York State. BMC Ophthalmol. 2007;7:1.
15. Zhang S, Ahearn DG, Stulting RD, et al. Differences among strains of the Fusarium oxysporum-F. solani complexes in their penetration of hydrogel contact lenses and subsequent susceptibility to multipurpose contact lens disinfection solutions. Cornea. 2007;26:1249-1254.
16. Imamura Y, Chandra J, Mukherjee PK, et al. Fusarium and Candida albicans biofilms on soft contact lenses: model development, influence of lens type, and susceptibility to lens care solutions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:171-182.
17. Tarabishy AB, Aldabagh B, Sun Y, et al. MyD88 regulation of Fusarium keratitis is dependent on TLR4 and IL-1R1 but not TLR2. J Immunol. 2008;181:593-600.
18. Johnson AC, Heinzel FP, Diaconu E, et al. Activation of toll-like receptor (TLR)2, TLR4, and TLR9 in the mammalian cornea induces MyD88-dependent corneal inflammation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:589-595.
19. Khatri S, Lass JH, Heinzel FP, et al. Regulation of endotoxininduced keratitis by PECAM-1, MIP-2, and toll-like receptor 4. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2278-2284.
20. O'Neill LA, Bowie AG. The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:353-364.
21. Hall LR, Diaconu E, Patel R, Pearlman E. CXC chemokine receptor 2 but not C-C chemokine receptor 1 expression is essential for neutrophil recruitment to the cornea in helminth-mediated keratitis (river blindness). J Immunol. 2001;166:4035-4041.
22. Lin M, Carlson E, Diaconu E, Pearlman E. CXCL1/KC and CXCL5/LIX are produced selectively by corneal fibroblasts and mediate neutrophil infiltration to the corneal stroma in LPS keratitis. J Leukoc Biol. 2006.
23. Khan S, Cole N, Hume EB, et al. The role of CXC chemokine receptor 2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa corneal infection. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81:315-318.
24. Lin M, Jackson P, Tester AM, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 facilitates neutrophil migration through the corneal stromal matrix by collagen degradation and production of the chemotactic peptide Pro-Gly-Pro. Am J Pathol. 2008;173:144-153.
25. Netea MG, Brown GD, Kullberg BJ, Gow NA. An integrated model of the recognition of Candida albicans by the innate immune system. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:67-78.
26. Netea MG, Gow NA, Munro CA, et al. Immune sensing of Candida albicans requires cooperative recognition of mannans and glucans by lectin and Toll-like receptors. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1642-1650.
27. Behlau I, Gilmore MS. Microbial biofilms in ophthalmology and infectious disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1572-1581.
28. Mukherjee PK, Mohamed S, Chandra J, et al. Alcohol dehydrogenase restricts the ability of the pathogen Candida albicans to form a biofilm on catheter surfaces through an ethanol-based mechanism. Infect Immun. 2006;74:3804-3816.
29. Mukherjee PK, Zhou G, Munyon R, Ghannoum MA. Candida biofilm: a well-designed protected environment. Med Mycol. 2005;43:191-208.
30. Norred WP, Bacon CW, Plattner RD, Vesonder RF. Differential cytotoxicity and mycotoxin content among isolates of Fusarium moniliforme. Mycopathologia. 1991;115:37-43.
31. Hu J, Wang Y, Xie L. Potential role of macrophages in experimental keratomycosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2087-2094.
32. Nathan C. Neutrophils and immunity: challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev. 2006;6:173-182.
33. Kiryu H, Yoshida S, Suenaga Y, Asahi M. Invasion and survival of Fusarium solani in the dexamethasone-treated cornea of rabbits. J Med Vet Mycol. 1991;29:395-406.
34. O'Day DM, Ray WA, Head WS, Robinson RD, Williams TE. Influence of corticosteroid on experimentally induced keratomycosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1601-1604.
35. Forster RK, Rebell G. Animal model of Fusarium solani keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79:510-515.
36. Wu TG, Keasler VV, Mitchell BM, Wilhelmus KR. Immunosuppression affects the severity of experimental Fusarium solani keratitis. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:192-198.
37. Takeda K, Akira S. TLR signaling pathways. Semin Immunol. 2004;16:3-9.
38. Kawai T, Akira S. TLR signaling. Semin Immunol. 2007;19:24-32.
39. Gersuk GM, Underhill DM, Zhu L, Marr KA. Dectin-1 and TLRs permit macrophages to distinguish between different Aspergillus fumigatus cellular states. J Immunol. 2006;176:3717-3724.
40. Bellocchio S, Moretti S, Perruccio K, et al. TLRs govern neutrophil activity in aspergillosis. J Immunol. 2004;173:7406-7415.
41. Netea MG, Van der Graaf C, Van der Meer JW, Kullberg BJ. Recognition of fungal pathogens by Toll-like receptors. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;23:672-676.
42. Luther K, Torosantucci A, Brakhage AA, Heesemann J, Ebel F. Phagocytosis of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia by murine macrophages involves recognition by the dectin-1 beta-glucan receptor and Toll-like receptor 2. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:368-381.
43. van der Graaf CA, Netea MG, Verschueren I, van der Meer JW, Kullberg BJ. Differential cytokine production and Toll-like receptor signaling pathways by Candida albicans blastoconidia and hyphae. Infect Immun. 2005;73:7458-7464.
44. Chinnery HR, Carlson EC, Sun Y, et al. Bone marrow chimeras and c-fms conditional ablation (Mafia) mice reveal an essential role for resident myeloid cells in lipopolysaccharide/TLR4-induced corneal inflammation. J Immunol. 2009;182:2738-2744.