All-ceramic immediate restoration of one-piece zirconium dioxide implants;Vollkeramische sofortversorgung einteiliger zirkondioxidimplantate

International Journal of Computerized Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 27-41

  Arnetzl, G V ^a   Payer, M ^a   Koller, M ^a   Kirmeier, R ^a   Arnetzl, Ch ^a   Jakse, N ^a   Hollyg, L ^a   Ametel, G ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

All ceramic restorative care; CAD CAM technology; Cerec; Immediate restoration; Zirconium dioxide implants

Indexed keywords

ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; HUMAN; INFECTION; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CEMENTATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 77949835369     PISSN: 14634201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Piattelli A, Scarano A, Paolantonio M et al. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections. J Periodontol 2001;72:1146-1150.
2. Jansen VK, Conrads G, Richter EJ. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface, lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:527-540.
3. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review, lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-728.
4. Chee W, Jivraj S. Screw versus cemented implant supported restorations. Br Dent J 2006;201:501-507.
5. Covani U, Marconcini S, Crespi R, Barone A. Bacterial plaque colonization around dental implant surfaces. Implant Dent 2006;15:298-304.
6. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontal 2001;72:1372-1383.
7. Vela-Nebot X, Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, Segalà-Torres M. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent 2006;15:313-320.
8. Meng JC, Everts JE, Qian F, Gratton DG. Influence of connection geometry on dynamic micromotion at the implantabutment interface, Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:623-625.
9. Janda R. Kleben und Klebetechniken: Teil 2: Adhäsiv-Systeme für Zahntechnik und -medizin, Dent Lab 1993;40:615-628.
10. Moro J. L, Rottner M, Alihodzic B, Weißbach M. Baukonstruktion - vom Prinzip zum Detail. Band 1: Grundlagen. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009.
11. Silva NR, Coelho PG, Fernandes CA, Navarro JM, Dias RA, Thompson VP. Reliability of one-piece ceramic implant. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:419-426.
12. Andreiotelli M, Kohal RJ. Fracture strength of zirconia implants after artificial aging. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:158-166.
13. Arnetzl, G. V, Arnetzl, G. Design of preparations for all-ceramic inlay materials, Int J Comput Dent 2006;9:289-298.
14. do Nascimento C, Pedrazzi V, Miani PK, Moreira LD, de Albuquerque Junior RF. Influence of repeated screw tightening on bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1394-1397.
15. Arnetzl G. Different Ceramic Technologies in a clinical Longterm Comparison. In: Werner H. Mörmann (ed). State of the Art of CAD/CAM Restorations. London: Quintessence Publishing, 2006.
16. Brevier Technische Keramik. Verband der Keramischen Industrie e.V. Selb: Selbstverlag 2003,160-173.