Screw versus cemented implant supported restorations

British Dental Journal

Volumn 201, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 501-507

  Chee, Winston ^a,b,c   Jivraj, S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of Southern California ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DEVICE REMOVAL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CEMENTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL OCCLUSION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DEVICE REMOVAL; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS;

EID: 33750355066     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: 17417503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4814157     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Misch C E. Screw-retained versus cement-retained implant-supported prostheses. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995; 7: 15-18.
2. Chee W, Felton D A, Johnson P F, Sullivan D Y. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 137-141.
3. Henry P J, Laney W R, Jemt T et al. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 450-455.
4. Cho S C, Small P N, Elian N, Tarnow D. Screw loosening for standard and wide diameter implants in partially edentulous cases: 3- to 7-year longitudinal data. Implant Dent 2004; 13: 245-250.
5. Doerr J. Simplified technique for retrieving cemented implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 352-353.
6. Okamoto M, Minagi S. Technique for removing a cemented superstructure from an implant abutment. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 241-242.
7. Gittleman N B. Retrieving cemented telescopic prostheses: technical note. Implant Dent 1996; 5: 91-92.
8. Chee W W, Torbati A, Albouy J P. Retrievable cemented implant restorations. J Prosthodont 1998; 7: 120-125.
9. Garber D A. The aesthetic dental implant: letting restoration be the guide. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 319-325
10. Salama H, Salama M A, Li T F et al. Treatment planning 2000: an aesthetically oriented revision of the original implant protocol. J Esthet Dent 1997; 9: 55-67.
11. Aalam A A, Reshad M, Chee W W, Nowzari H. Surgical template stabilization with transitional implants in the treatment of the edentulous mandible: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 462-465.
12. Shotwell J L, Billy E J, Wang H L, Oh T J. Implant surgical guide fabrication for partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 294-297.
13. Meitner S W, Tallents R H. Surgical templates for prosthetically guided implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 569-574.
14. Pietrabissa R, Gionso L, Quaglini V et al. An in vitro study on compensation of mismatch of screw versus cement-retained implant supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 448-457
15. Guichet D L, Caputo A A, Choi H, Sorensen J A. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 239-246.
16. Kim W D, Jacobson Z, Nathanson D. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses. Implant Dent 1999; 8: 141-151.
17. Heckmann S M, Karl M, Wichmann M G et al. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 466-473.
18. Romero G G, Engelmeier R, Powers J M, Canterbury A A. Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 602-607.
19. Linehan A D, Windeler A S. Passive fit of implant-retained prosthetic superstructures improved by electric discharge machining. J Prosthodont 1994; 3: 88-95.
20. Aparicio C. A new method for achieving passive fit of an interim restoration supported by Branemark implants: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 614-618.
21. Aparicio C. A new method to routinely achieve passive fit of ceramometal prostheses over Branemark osseointegrated implants: a two-year report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994; 14: 404-419.
22. Stumpel L J III, Quon S J. Adhesive abutment cylinder luting. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 398-400.
23. Chee W W. Provisional restorations in soft tissue management around dental implants. Periodontol 2000 2001; 27: 139-147.
24. Chee W W, Donovan T. Use of provisional restorations to enhance soft-tissue contours for implant restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 481-486, 488-489.
25. Chee W W, Cho G C, Ha S. Replicating soft tissue contours on working casts for implant restorations. J Prosthodont 1997; 6: 218-220.
26. Neale D, Chee W W. Development of implant soft tissue emergence profile: a technique. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 364-368.
27. Hebel K S, Gajar R C. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and aesthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 28-35.
28. Agar J R, Cameron S M, Hughbanks J C, Parker M H. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 43-47.
29. Keith S E, Miller B H, Woody R D, Higginbottom F L. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 369-378
30. Michalakis K X, Hirayama H, Garefis P D. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 719-728.