Benefits of an Implant Platform Modification Technique to Reduce Crestal Bone Resorption

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 313-320

  Vela Nebot, Xavier ^a,c   Rodríguez Ciurana, Xavier ^b   Rodado Alonso, Carlos ^b   Segalá Torres, Maribel ^a  

^a Private practice   (Spain)

^b Private Practice in Maxillofacial Surgery   (Spain)

^c NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biologic width; Bone loss; Dental implants; Microgap; Platform modification

Indexed keywords

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DENTURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAW DISEASE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOLYSIS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBULAR DISEASES; MAXILLARY DISEASES;

EID: 33748678088     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000226788.19742.32     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban B. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol. 1961;32:261-267.
2. Vacek JS, Gher ME, Assad DA, et al. The dimensions of the human dentogingival junction. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994;14:155-165.
3. Bergliundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, et al. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991;2:81-90.
4. Savani F, Weisgold AS, Rose LF. Biologic width and its relation to periodontal biotypes. J Esthet Dent. 1998;10:157-163.
5. Tamow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol. 2000;71:546-549.
6. Romanos G, Toh CG, Siar CH et al. Peri-implant bone reactions to immediately loaded implants. An experimental study in monkeys. J Periodontol. 2001;72:506-511.
7. Hartman GA. Initial implant position determines the magnitude of crestal bone remodeling. J Periodontol. 2004;74:572-577.
8. Gadhia MH, Holt RL. A new implant design for optimal esthetics and retention of interproximal papillae. Implant Dent. 2003;12:164-169.
9. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, et al. Biologic width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:559-571.
10. Piattelli A, Vrespa G, Petrone G, et al. Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: A retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys. J Periodontol. 2003;74:346-352.
11. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, et al. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 1997;68:1117-1130.
12. King GN, Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, et al. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in nonsubmerged dental implants: A radiographic study in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2002;73:1111-1117.
13. Callan DP, Cobb CM, Williams KB. DMA probe identification of bacteria colonizing internal surfaces of the implant-abutment interface: A preliminary study. J Periodontol. 2005;76:115-120.
14. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, et al. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2001;2:1372-1383.