Scholarship and disciplinary practices

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 42, Issue , 2008, Pages 163-212

  Palmer, Carole L ^a   Cragin, Melissa H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b GSLIS

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349051457     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.2008.1440420112     Document Type: Review

References (254)

1. Abrahamsen, K. T. (2003). Indexing of musical genres: An epistemological perspective. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 144-169.
2. Agre, P. E. (1995). Institutional circuitry: Thinking about the forms and uses of information. Information Technology and Libraries, 14(4), 225-230.
3. Allen, T. J. (1966). Managing the flow of scientific and technical information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Allen, T. J. (1969). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 4, 3-30.
5. American Council of Learned Societies. (2006). Our cultural commonwealth: The report of the American Council of Learned Societies Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for Humanities and Social Science. New York: The Council.
6. American Psychological Association. (1963). Project on scientific information exchange in psychology. Washington, DC: The Association.
7. Bakewell, E., Beeman, W. O., & Reese, C. M. (1988). Object, image, inquiry: The art historian at work (M. Schmitt, Ed.). Santa Monica, CA: J. Paul Getty Trust.
8. Barjak, F. (2006). The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(10), 1350-1367.
9. Bates, M. J. (1994). The design of databases and other information resources for humanities scholars: The Getty online searching project report no. 4. Online and CDROM Review, 18(6), 331-340.
10. Bates, M. J. (1996a). Document familiarity, relevance, and Bradford's law: The Getty online searching project report no. 5. Information Processing & Management, 32(6), 697-707.
11. Bates, M. J. (1996b). The Getty end-user online searching project in the humanities: Report no. 6: Overview and conclusions. College & Research Libraries, 57(6), 514-523.
12. Bates, M. J. (1996c). Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students. Library Trends, 45(2), 155-164.
13. Bates, M. J. (1998). Indexing and access for digital libraries and the Internet: Human, database, and domain factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1185-1205.
14. Bates, M. J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1043-1050.
15. Bates, M. J. (2002). Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution. Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, 137-149.
16. Bates, M. J., Wilde, D. N., & Siegfried, S. (1993). An analysis of search terminology used by humanities scholars: The Getty online searching project report no. 1. Library Quarterly, 63(1), 1-39.
17. Bates, M. J., Wilde, D. N., & Siegfried, S. (1995). Research practices of humanities scholars in an online environment: The Getty online searching project report no. 3. Library & Information Science Research, 17(1), 5-40.
18. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
19. Beaulieu, A. (2004). From brainbank to database: The informational turn in the study of the brain. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35(2), 367-390.
20. Becher, T. (1990). The counter-culture of specialization. European Journal of Education, 25(3), 333-346.
21. Becher, T. (2000). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
22. Berthel, J. H. (1968). Twentieth century scholarship and the research library: A marriage of convenience. University of Tennessee Library Lectures, 20, 15-31.
23. Biagioli, M. (2003). Rights or rewards?: Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. In M. Biagioli & P. Galison (Eds.), Scientific authorship: Credit and intellectual property in science (pp. 253-279). New York: Routledge.
24. Birnholtz, J. P., & Bietz, M. J. (2003). Data at work: Supporting sharing in science and engineering. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 339-348.
25. Bishop, A. P. (1999). Document structure and digital libraries: How researchers mobilize information in journal articles. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), 255-279.
26. Borgman, C. L. (Ed.). (1990). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Borgman, C. L. (2000). Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication. Journal of Documentation, 56(4), 412-430.
28. Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
29. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255.
30. Boulding, K. E. (1968). Knowledge as a commodity. In K. E. Boulding, Beyond economics: Essays on society, religion, and ethics (pp. 141-150). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31. Bowker, G. C. (2000). Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, 30(5), 643-683.
32. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Bradford, S. C. (1948). Documentation. London: Crosby Lockwood.
34. Brockman, W. S., Neumann, L., Palmer, C. L., & Tidline, T. (2001). Scholarly work in the humanities and the evolving information environment. Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation and the Council on Library and Information Resources.
35. Brodkey, L. (1987). Academic writing as social practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
36. Brown, C. D. (2002). Straddling the humanities and social sciences: The research process of music scholars. Library & Information Science Research, 24(1), 73-94.
37. Brown, C. M. (1999). Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 929-943.
38. Brown, C. M. (2003). The changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and protein database usage and acceptance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 926-938.
39. Buchanan, G., Cunningham, S. J., Blandford, A., Rimmer, J., & Warwick, C. (2005). Information seeking by humanities scholars. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3652), 218-229.
40. Burton, O. V. (Ed.). (2002). Computing in the social sciences and humanities. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
41. Campbell, D. (1969). Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences (pp. 328-348). Chicago: Aldine.
42. Case, D. O. (1986). Collection and organization of written information by social scientists and humanists: A review and exploratory study. Journal of Information Science, 12(3), 97-104.
43. Case, D. O. (1991). The collection and use of information by some American historians: A study of motives and methods. Library Quarterly, 61(1), 61-82.
44. Chen, C., & Paul, R. J. (2001). Visualizing a knowledge domain intellectual structure. Computer, 34(3), 65-71.
45. Chu, C. M. (1999). Literary critics at work and their information needs: A research-phases model. Library & Information Science Research, 21(2), 247-273.
46. Chubin, D. E. (1976). The conceptualization of scientific specialties. Sociological Quarterly, 17(4), 448-476.
47. Chubin, D. E., Porter, A. L., & Rossini, F. A. (Eds.). (1986). Interdisciplinary analysis and research: Theory and practice of problem-focused research and development. Mt. Airy, MD: Lomond.
48. Cole, S. (1983). The hierarchy of the sciences? American Journal of Sociology, 89, 111-139.
49. Collins, H. M. (1987). Expert systems and the science of knowledge. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 329-348). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. S. (1993). The articulation of work through interaction. Sociological Quarterly, 34(1), 71-83.
51. Covi, L. M. (1999). Material mastery: Situating digital library use in university research practices. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), 293-316.
52. Covi, L. M. (2000). Debunking the myth of the Nintendo generation: How doctoral students introduce new electronic communication practices into university research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1284-1294.
53. Cragin, M. H., & Shankar, K. (2006). Scientific data collections and distributed collective practice. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15(2/3), 185-204.
54. Crane, D. (1971). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 6, 3-39.
55. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Cronin, B. (1982). Invisible colleges and information transfer: A review and commentary with particular reference to the social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 38(3), 212-236.
57. Cronin, B. (1995). The scholar's courtesy: The role of acknowledgements in the primary communication process. London: Taylor Graham.
58. Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558-569.
59. Cronin, B. (2003). Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 9, 1-24.
60. Cronin, B. (2005). The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards. Latham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
61. Cummings, J., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 703-722.
62. Davis, P. M., & Solla, L. R. (2003). An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(11), 1062-1068.
63. de Jong, H., & Rip, A. (1997). The computer revolution in science: Steps towards the realization of computer-supported discovery environments. Artificial Intelligence, 91(2), 225-256.
64. Duff, W. M., & Johnson, C. A. (2002). Accidentally found on purpose: Information-seeking behavior of historians in archives. Library Quarterly, 72(4), 472-496.
65. Eason, K., Richardson, S., & Yu, L. (2000). Patterns of use of electronic journals. Journal of Documentation, 56(5), 477-504.
66. Edge, D. O. (1979). Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review. History of Science, 17(2), 102-134.
67. Egan, M. E. (Ed.). (1954). The communication of specialized information. Chicago: Distributed by the American Library Association for the University of Chicago Graduate Library School.
68. Egan, M. E., & Shera, J. H. (1952). Foundations of a theory of bibliography. Library Quarterly, 22(2), 125-137.
69. Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioral approach to information retrieval system design. Journal of Documentation, 45(2), 171-212.
70. Ellis, D. (1993). Modeling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers: A grounded theory approach. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 469-486.
71. Ellis, D., Cox, D., & Hall, K. (1993). A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 356-369.
72. Ellis, D., & Oldman, H. (2005). The English literature researcher in the age of the Internet. Journal of Information Science, 31(1), 29-36.
73. Fallis, D. (2002). Introduction: Social epistemology and information science. Social Epistemology, 16(1), 1-4.
74. Foster, A. (2004). A nonlinear model of information-seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3), 228-237.
75. Frohmann, B. (2004). Deflating information: From science studies to documentation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
76. Frost, C. O. (1979). The use of citations in literary research: A preliminary classification of citation functions. Library Quarterly, 49(4), 399-414.
77. Fry, J. (2004). The cultural shaping of ICTs within academic fields: Corpus-based linguistics as a case study. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 19(3), 303-319.
78. Fry, J. (2006a). Scholarly research and information practices: A domain analytic approach. Information Processing & Management, 42(1), 299-316.
79. Fry, J. (2006b). Studying the scholarly Web: How disciplinary culture shapes online representations. International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics, 10(1), paper 2. Retrieved July 19, 2006, from www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v10i1p2.html
80. Fry, J., & Talja, S. (2004). The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 20-30.
81. Fry, J., & Talja, S. (2007). The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 115-133.
82. Fuchs, S. (1992). The professional quest for truth: A social theory of science and knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press.
83. Fujimura, J. H. (1987). Constructing do-able problems in cancer research: Articulating alignment. Social Studies of Science, 17(2), 257-293.
84. Furner, J. (2002). Shera's social epistemology recast as psychological bibliology. Social Epistemology, 16(1), 5-22.
85. Galison, P. (1996). Computer simulations and the trading zone. In P. Galison & D. J. Stump (Eds.), The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power (pp. 118-157). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
86. Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1963). The American Psychological Association project on scientific information exchange in psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 10, 297-302.
87. Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1964). The effect of convention presentations on information exchange behavior and subsequent research. Proceedings of the American Documentation Institute, 201-213.
88. Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1968). Informal channels of communication in the behavioral sciences: Their relevance in the structuring of formal or bibliographic communication. In E. B. Montgomery (Ed.), The foundations of access to knowledge. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
89. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
90. Green, R. (2000). Locating sources in humanities scholarship: The efficacy of following bibliographic references. Library Quarterly, 70(2), 201-229.
91. Griffith, B. C., & Small, H. G. (1983). The structure of the social and behavioral sciences literature. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technical Libraries.
92. Hallmark, J. (2001). Information-seeking behavior of academic meteorologists and the role of information specialists. Science and Technology Libraries, 21(1/2), 53-64.
93. Hallmark, J. (2004). Access and retrieval of recent journal articles: A comparative study of chemists and geoscientists. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 40, article 1. Retrieved July 7, 2006, from www.istl.org/04-summer/article1.html
94. Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S.-L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 952-965.
95. Hargens, L. (2000). Using the literature: Reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship. American Sociological Review, 65(6), 846-865.
96. Hartel, J. (2003). The serious leisure frontier in library and information science: Hobby domains. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 228-238.
97. Hartley, J. (2006). Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1194-1207.
98. Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Learning and knowledge networks in interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1079-1092.
99. Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(4), 448-473.
100. Henderson, K. (1999). On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
101. Herner, S., & Herner, M. (1967). Information needs and uses in science and technology. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2, 1-34.
102. Hills, P. J. (1983). The scholarly communication process. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 18, 99-125.
103. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
104. Hine, C. (2005). Material culture and the shaping of e-science. First International Conference on E-Social Science. Retrieved July 24, 2006, from www.ncess.ac.uk/events/conference/2005/papers/papers/ncess2005_paper_Hine.pdf
105. Hine, C. (2006). Databases as scientific instruments and their role in the ordering of scientific work. Social Studies of Science, 36(2), 269-298.
106. Hjørland, B. (2002a). Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, 58(4), 422-462.
107. Hjørland, B. (2002b). Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(6), 557-560.
108. Hjørland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425.
109. Hjørland, B., & Hartel, J. (2003). Ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 239-245.
110. Hobohm, H.-C. (1999). Social science information and documentation: Time for a state of the art? INSPEL, 3, 123-130.
111. Hoch, P. K. (1987). Institutional versus intellectual migration in the nucleation of new scientific specialties. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 18(4), 481-500.
112. Houghton, J. W., Steele, C., & Henty, M. (2004). Research practices and scholarly communication in the digital environment. Learned Publishing, 17(3), 231-249.
113. Hulme, E. W. (1923). Statistical bibliography in relation to the growth of modern civilization. London: Butler and Tanner Crafton.
114. Hurd, J. M. (1992). Interdisciplinary research in the sciences: Implications for library organization. College & Research Libraries, 53(4), 283-297.
115. Hutto, D. (2003). When professional biologists write: An ethnographic study with pedagogical implications. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12(2), 207-223.
116. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, UK: Longman.
117. Ileperuma, S. (2002). Information gathering behaviour of arts scholars in Sri Lankan universities: A critical evaluation. Collection Building, 21(1), 22-31.
118. International Conference on Scientific Information (1959). Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
119. Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., & Huntington, P. (2005). The use and users of scholarly e-journals: A review of log-analysis studies. Aslib Proceedings, 57(6), 554-571.
120. Kim, H.-C., & Eklundh, K. S. (2001). Reviewing practices in collaborative writing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10, 247-259.
121. King, D. W., & Tenopir, C. (1999). Using and reading scholarly literature. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 423-477.
122. Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.
123. Klein, J. T. (1993). Blurring, cracking, and crossing: Permeation and the fracturing of discipline. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity (pp. 185-211). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
124. Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
125. Kling, R., & Covi, L. (1995). Electronic journals and legitimate media in the systems of scholarly communication. The Information Society, 11(4), 261-271.
126. Kling, R., & Covi, L. (1997). Digital libraries and the practices of scholarly communication: Report of a project (CSI Working Paper No. WP-97-03). Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Social Informatics. Retrieved July 20, 2006, from rkcsi.indiana.edu/archive/CSI/WP/wp97-03B.html
127. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1306-1320.
128. Kling, R., McKim, G., & King, A. (2003). A bit more to it: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 47-67.
129. Knorr Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
130. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
131. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
132. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
133. Leahey, E., Entwisle, B., & Einaudi, P. (2003). Diversity in everyday research practice: The case of data editing. Sociological Methods & Research, 32(1), 64-89.
134. Leckie, G. J., Pettigrew, K. E., & Sylvain, C. (1996). Modeling the information-seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Library Quarterly, 66(2), 161-193.
135. Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Reconciling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 59-69). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
136. Lievrouw, L. A., Rogers, E. M., Lowe, C. U., & Nadel, E. (1987). Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists. Social Networks, 9, 217-248.
137. Line, M. B. (1971). The information uses and needs of social scientists: An overview of INFROSS. Aslib Proceedings, 21(8), 412-434.
138. Line, M. B. (1981). The structure of social science literature as shown by a large-scale citation analysis. Social Science Information Studies, 1, 67-87.
139. Line, M. B. (2000). Social science information: The poor relation. IFLA Journal, 26(3), 177-179.
140. MacMullin, S. E., & Taylor, R. S. (1984). Problem dimensions and information traits. The Information Society, 3(1), 91-111.
141. Manoff, M. (1997). Cyberhope or cyberhype?: Computers and scholarly research. Canadian Journal of Communication, 22(3), 197-212.
142. Marshall, C. C. (1998a). The future of annotation in a digital (paper) world. Paper presented at the 35th Annual GSLIS Clinic: Successes and Failures of Digital Libraries, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved February 26, 2007, from www.csdl.tamu.edu/~marshall/uiuc-paper- complete.pdf
143. Marshall, C. C. (1998b). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, 40-49.
144. Marshall, C. C., & Brush, A. J. B. (2004). Exploring the relationship between personal and public annotations. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 349-357.
145. McCain, K. (1986a). Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 111-122.
146. McCain, K. (1986b). Cross-disciplinary citation patterns in the history of technology. In J. M. Hurd & C. H. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 194-198.
147. Meho, L. I., & Haas, S. W. (2001). Information-seeking behavior and use of social science faculty studying stateless nations: A case study. Library & Information Science Research, 21(1), 5-25.
148. Meho, L. I., & Tibbo, H. R. (2003). Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 570-587.
149. Menzel, H. (1966). Information needs and uses in science and technology. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 1, 41-69.
150. Merton, R. (1967). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
151. Merz, M. (2006). Embedding digital infrastructure in epistemic culture. In C. M. Hine (Ed.), New infrastructures for knowledge production: Understanding e-science (pp. 99-119). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
152. Michels, D. H. (2005). The use of people as information sources in biblical studies research. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 29(1), 91-109.
153. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative topology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237-1249.
154. Mote, L. J. B. (1962). Reasons for the variations in the information needs of scientists. Journal of Documentation, 18(4), 169-175.
155. Mulkay, M. (1974). Conceptual displacement and migration in science. Science Studies, 4(3), 205-234.
156. Mullins, N. C., Hargens, L. L., Hecht, P. K., & Kick, E. L. (1977). The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study. American Sociological Review, 42(4), 552-562.
157. Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
158. Myers, G. (1993). The social construction of two biologists' articles. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity (pp. 327-367). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
159. National Research Council. (1993). National collaboratories: Applying information technologies for scientific research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
160. Nentwich, M. (2006). Cyberinfrastructure for next generation scholarly publishing. In C. M. Hine (Ed.), New infrastructures for knowledge production: Understanding e-science (pp. 189-205). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
161. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R., & Watkinson, A. (2006). The information-seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals. Information Processing & Management, 42(5), 1345-1365.
162. O'Hara, K., Taylor, A., Newman, W., & Sellen, A. J. (2002). Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56(3), 269-305.
163. Ørom, A. (2003). Knowledge organization in the domain of art studies: History, transition and conceptual changes. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 128-143.
164. Packer, K. H., & Soergel, D. (1979). The importance of SDI for current awareness in fields with severe scatter of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(3), 125-135.
165. Paisley, W. J. (1968). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 3, 1-30.
166. Palmer, C. L. (1996a). Information work at the boundaries of science: Linking information services to research practices. Library Trends, 45(2), 165-191.
167. Palmer, C. L. (1996b). Introduction. Library Trends, 45(2), 129-133.
168. Palmer, C. L. (1999a). Aligning studies of information seeking and use with domain analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1139-1140.
169. Palmer, C. L. (1999b). Structures and strategies of interdisciplinary science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 242-253.
170. Palmer, C. L. (2001a). The information connection in scholarly synthesis. In R. G. McInnis (Ed.), Discourse synthesis: Studies in historical and contemporary social epistemology (pp. 125-141). Westport, CT: Praeger.
171. Palmer, C. L. (2001b). Work at the boundaries of science: Information and the interdisciplinary research process. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
172. Palmer, C. L. (2004). Thematic research collections. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), Companion to digital humanities (pp. 348-365). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Retrieved January 17, 2007, from www.digitalhumanities.org/companion
173. Palmer, C. L. (2005). Scholarly work and the shaping of digital access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(11), 1140-1153.
174. Palmer, C. L. (2006). Weak information work and "doable" problems in interdisciplinary science. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved February 26, 2007, from eprints.rclis.org/archive/00008183/01/Palmer_Weak.pdf
175. Palmer, C. L., Cragin, M. H., & Hogan, T. P. (2007). Weak information work in scientific discovery. Information Processing & Management, 43(3), 808-820.
176. Palmer, C. L., & Neumann, L. J. (2002). The information work of interdisciplinary humanities scholars: Exploration and translation. Library Quarterly, 72(1), 85-117.
177. Palmer, J. (1991). Scientists and information: Using cluster analysis to identify information style. Journal of Documentation, 47(2), 105-129.
178. Pavliscak, P., Ross, S., & Henry, C. (1997). Information technology in humanities scholarship: Achievements, prospects, and challenges: The United States focus (ACLS Occasional Paper no. 37). New York: American Council of Learned Societies. Retrieved July 24, 2006, from www.acls.org/op37. htm
179. Perry, C. A. (2003). Network influences on scholarly communications in developmental dyslexia: A longitudinal follow-up. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(14), 1278-1295.
180. Pickering, A. (1992). Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
181. Pierce, S. J. (1990). Disciplinary work and interdisciplinary areas: Sociology and bibliometrics. In C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 46-58). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
182. Pierce, S. J. (1999). Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 271-279.
183. Pinch, T. (1990). The culture of scientists and disciplinary rhetoric. European Journal of Education, 25(3), 295-304.
184. Price, D. J. D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
185. Rheinberger, H.-J. (2003). Discourses of circumstance: A note on the author in science. In M. Biagioli & P. Galison (Eds.), Scientific authorship: Credit and intellectual property in science (pp. 309-323). New York: Routledge.
186. Rinia, E. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Bruins, E. E. W., van Vuren, H. G., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2002). Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics, 54(3), 347-362.
187. Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
188. Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2005). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: The 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes. Aslib Proceedings, 57(6), 481-497.
189. Royal Society Scientific Information Conference (1948). Report and papers submitted. London: The Society.
190. Ruhleder, K. (1994). Rich and lean representations of information for knowledge work: The role of computing packages in the work of classical scholars. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2), 208-230.
191. Sandstrom, P. E. (1994). An optimal foraging approach to information seeking and use. Library Quarterly, 64(4), 414-449.
192. Savolainen, R. (1998). Use studies of electronic networks: A review of empirical research approaches and challenges for their development. Journal of Documentation, 54(3), 332-351.
193. Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1-14). New York: Routledge.
194. Schilit, B. N., Golovchinsky, G., & Price, M. N. (1998). Beyond paper: Supporting active reading with free form digital ink annotations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 249-256.
195. Schreibman, S., Siemans, R., & Unsworth, J. (Eds.). (2004). A companion to digital humanities. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
196. Shera, J. H. (1972). An epistemological foundation for library science. In J. H. Shera, The foundations of education for librarianship (pp. 109-134). New York: Becker and Hayes.
197. Siegfried, S., Bates, M. J., & Wilde, D. N. (1993). A profile of end-user searching behavior by humanities scholars: The Getty online searching project report no. 2. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(5), 273-291.
198. Simon, H. A., Langley, P. W., & Bradshaw, G. L. (1981). Scientific discovery as problem solving. Synthese, 47(1), 1-27.
199. Sismondo, S. (2004). Introduction to science and technology studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
200. Skelton, B. (1973). Scientists and social scientists as information users: A comparison of results of science user studies with the investigation into information requirements of the social sciences. Journal of Librarianship, 5(2), 138-156.
201. Small, H. G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327-340.
202. Small, H. G., & Crane, D. (1979). Specialties and disciplines in science and social science: An examination of their structure using citation indexes. Scientometrics, 1, 445-461.
203. Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.
204. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 643-681.
205. Sonnenwald, D. H., Maglaughlin, K. L., & Whitton, M. C. (2004). Designing to support situation awareness across distances: An example from a scientific collaboratory. Information Processing & Management, 40(6), 989-1011.
206. Soper, M. E. (1976). Characteristics and use of personal collections. Library Quarterly, 46(4), 397-415.
207. Spanner, D. (2001). Border crossings: Understanding the cultural and informational dilemmas of interdisciplinary scholars. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(5), 352-360.
208. Stam, D. C. (1984). How art historians look for information. Art Documentation, 3(1), 117-119.
209. Star, S. L. (1983). Simplification in scientific work: An example from neuroscience research. Social Studies of Science, 13(2), 205-228.
210. Steele, T. W., & Stier, J. C. (2000). The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: A forestry case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(5), 476-484.
211. Stone, S. (1982). Humanities scholars: Information needs and uses. Journal of Documentation, 38(4), 292-313.
212. Strauss, A. (1988). The articulation of project work: An organizational process. Sociological Quarterly, 29(2), 163-178.
213. Strauss, A., Fagerhaugh, S., Suszek, B., & Wiener, C. (1985). Social organization of medical work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
214. Sundin, O. (2003). Towards an understanding of symbolic aspects of professional information: An analysis of the nursing knowledge domain. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 170-181.
215. Talja, S. (2002). Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. New Review of Information Behavior Research, 3, 143-160.
216. Talja, S. (2005). The domain analytic approach to scholars' information practices. In K. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 123-127). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
217. Talja, S., & Maula, H. (2003). Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines. Journal of Documentation, 59(6), 673-691.
218. Talja, S., Savolainen, R., & Maula, H. (2004). Field differences in the use and perceived usefulness of scholarly mailing lists. Information Research, 10(1), paper 200. Retrieved July 18, 2006, from InformationR.net/ir/10-1/paper200.html
219. Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. Progress in Communication Sciences, 10, 217-255.
220. Tennis, J. T. (2003). Two axes of domains for domain analysis. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 191-195.
221. Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: An overview and analysis of recent research studies. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
222. Tibbo, H. R. (1992). Abstracting across the disciplines: A content analysis of abstracts from the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval. Library & Information Science Research, 14, 31-56.
223. Tibbo, H. R. (1994). Indexing for the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(8), 607-619.
224. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
225. Turner, W. A. (1994). What's in an R: InfoRmetrics or infometrics? Scientometrics, 30(2/3), 471-480.
226. Unsworth, J. (2000, May). Scholarly primitives: What methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this? In Symposium on Humanities Computing: Formal Methods, Experimental Practice. King's College, London. Retrieved July 19, 2006, from www.iath.virginia.edu/ ~jmu2m/Kings.5-00/primitives.html
227. Vakkari, P. (1999). Task complexity, information types, search strategies and relevance: Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 819-837.
228. Vakkari, P., & Talja, S. (in press). Search methods of e-journal articles for academic tasks: A case study of FinELib. Information Research.
229. Van House, N. A. (2004). Science and technology studies and information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 1-86.
230. Van House, N. A., Butler, M., & Schiff, L. (1998). Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: Sharing environmental planning data sets. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 335-343.
231. Varghese, S. A., & Abraham, S. A. (2004). Book-length scholarly essays as a hybrid genre in science. Written Communication, 21(2), 201-231.
232. Walsh, J. P., & Bayma, T. (1996a). Computer networks and scientific work. Social Studies of Science, 26(3), 661-703.
233. Walsh, J. P., & Bayma, T. (1996b). The virtual college: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work. The Information Society, 12(4), 343-363.
234. Walsh, J. P., Kucker, S., Maloney, N. G., & Gabbay, S. (2000). Connecting minds: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1295-1305.
235. Wang, P., & White, M. D. (1999). A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 98-114.
236. Watson-Boone, R. (1994). The information needs and habits of humanities scholars. RQ, 34(2), 203-216.
237. Weisgerber, D. W. (1993). Interdisciplinary searching: Problems and suggested remedies. A report from the ICSTI Group on Interdisciplinary Searching. Journal of Documentation, 49(3), 231-254.
238. Wellman, B. (1996). For a social network analysis of computer networks: A sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community. Proceedings of SIGCPR/SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research, 1-11.
239. Westbrook, L. (2003). Information needs and experiences of scholars in women's studies: Problems and solutions. College & Research Libraries, 64(3), 192-209.
240. White, H. D. (1996). Literature retrieval for interdisciplinary syntheses. Library Trends, 45(2), 239-264.
241. White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 87-108.
242. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author-cocitation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
243. White, H. D., Wellman, B., & Nazer, N. (2003). Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the Globenet interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 111-126.
244. White, M. D. (1975). The communication behavior of academic economists in research phases. Library Quarterly, 45(4), 337-354.
245. White, M. D., & Wang, P. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67(2), 122-154.
246. Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
247. Wiberley, S. E. (1991). Habits of humanists: Scholarly behavior and new information technologies. Library Hi Tech, 9(1), 17-21.
248. Wiberley, S. E., & Jones, W. G. (1989). Patterns of information seeking in the humanities. College & Research Libraries, 50(6), 638-645.
249. Wiberley, S. E., & Jones, W. G. (1994). Humanists revisited: A longitudinal look at the adoption of information technology. College & Research Libraries, 55(6), 499-509.
250. Wiberley, S. E., & Jones, W. G. (2000). Time and technology: A decade-long look at humanists use of electronic information technology. College & Research Libraries, 61(5), 421-431.
251. Woolgar, S., & Coopmans, C. (2006). Virtual witnessing in a virtual age: A prospectus for social studies of e-Science. In C. M. Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-science (pp. 1-25). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
252. Wouters, P. (2006, July). What is the matter with e-science? Thinking aloud about informatisation in knowledge creation. Pantaneto Forum, 23. Retrieved July 26, 2006, from www.pantaneto.co.uk/issue23/wouters.htm
253. Zimmerman, A. (2003). Data sharing and secondary use of scientific data: Experiences of ecologists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
254. Zuccala, A. (2006). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 152-168.