Towards an acceptance of performance assessment

Medical Education

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 959-964

  Finucane, P M ^a   Barron, S R ^b   Davies, H A ^c   Hadfield Jones, R S ^d   Kaigas, T M ^e  

^a Medical Council of Ireland   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c SHEFFIELD CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d Professional Development and Practice Support   (Canada)

^e Cambridge Memorial Hospital   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clinical competence standards; Education, medical, continuing standards; Patient satisfaction; Physician, family standards

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPETENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSUMER; EMPLOYER; EXPECTATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL CARE; MODEL; PATIENT; PHYSICIAN; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY;

EID: 0036406959     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01314.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Rethans JJ, Norcini JJ, Blackmore D, Jolly BC, LaDuca T, Lew S, Page GG, Southgate LH. The relationship between competence and performance: Implications for assessing practice performance. Med Educ 2002;36:901-909.
2. Hays RB, Davies HA, Beard JD, Caldon LJM, Farmer EA, Finucane PM, McCrorie P, Newble DI, Schuwirth LWT, Sibbald GR. Selecting performance assessment methods. Med Educ 2002;36:910-917.
3. van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Education 1996;1:41-67.
4. McManus IC, Winder BC, Gordon D. UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99. Med Educ 2001;35 (Suppl. 1):60-9.
5. Southgate L, Cox J, David T et al. The assessment of poorly performing doctors: The development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures. Med Educ 2001;35:2-8.
6. Irvine D. The performance of doctors. I. Professionalism and self-regulation in a changing world. BMJ 1997;314:1540-2.
7. Irvine D. The performance of doctors. II. Maintaining good practice, protecting patients from poor performance. BMJ 1997;314:1613-5.
8. Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S. Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives. JAMA 1997;278:1608-12.
9. Kelson M. Consumer Involvement in the Audit Activities of the Royal Colleges and Other Professional Bodies. London: College of Health; 1996.
10. Du Boulay C. Revalidation for doctors in the United Kingdom: The end or the beginning? BMJ 2000;320:1490.
11. Williamson C. Consumer and professional standards: Working towards consensus. Qual Health Care 2000;9:190-4.
12. Kemp BJ. Motivation, rehabilitation and ageing: A conceptual model. Topics Geriatric Rehabilitation 1988;3:41-51.
13. Bashook PG, Parboosingh J. Recertification and the maintenance of competence. BMJ 1998;316:545-8.
14. Chin R, Benne KD. General strategies for effecting changes in human systems. In: Bennis W, Benne K, Chin R, Corey K, eds. The Planning of Change. New York, London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1976.
15. Gale R, Grant J. Managing Change in a Medical Context: Guidelines for Action. London: Joint Centre for Educational Research and Development in Medicine; 1990.
16. Schuwirth LWT, Southgate L, Page GG, Paget NS, Lescop JMJ, Lew SR, Wade WB, Barón-Maldonado M. When enough is enough: A conceptual basis for fair and defensible practice performance assessment. Med Educ 2002;36:923-930.