|
Volumn 35, Issue , 2001, Pages 36-44
|
The reproducibility of assessing radiological reporting: Studies from the development of the General Medical Council's performance procedures
a b c d d e f |
Author keywords
Assessment; Competence; Generalizability; Performance; Radiology; Reliability
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
COMPETENCE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DECISION MAKING;
EVALUATION;
HUMAN;
PEER REVIEW;
PERFORMANCE;
PHYSICIAN;
RADIOLOGIST;
RELIABILITY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SAMPLING;
SKILL;
CLASSIFICATION;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
DIAGNOSTIC ERROR;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
MEDICAL SOCIETY;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
RADIOLOGY;
STANDARD;
STATISTICS;
UNITED KINGDOM;
CLINICAL PROTOCOL;
RATING SCALE;
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
DECISION MAKING;
DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
JUDGMENT;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE;
RADIOLOGY;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;
STATE MEDICINE;
|
EID: 0035673148
PISSN: 03080110
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00005.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (16)
|
References (12)
|