메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 35, Issue , 2001, Pages 36-44

The reproducibility of assessing radiological reporting: Studies from the development of the General Medical Council's performance procedures

Author keywords

Assessment; Competence; Generalizability; Performance; Radiology; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION; HUMAN; PEER REVIEW; PERFORMANCE; PHYSICIAN; RADIOLOGIST; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAMPLING; SKILL; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; RADIOLOGY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; RATING SCALE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

EID: 0035673148     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00005.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (16)

References (12)
  • 1
    • 0030916154 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The performance of doctors. II. Maintaining good practice, protecting patients from poor performance
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.314 , pp. 1613-1615
    • Irvine, D.1
  • 3
    • 0033589736 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Managing the clinical performance of doctors
    • (1999) BMJ , vol.319 , pp. 1314-1315
    • Smith, R.1
  • 8
    • 0029876126 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mammography screening: An incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms
    • (1996) BMJ , vol.312 , pp. 809-812
    • Brown, J.1    Bryan, S.2    Warren, R.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.