Post-disaster risk management: From the perspective of policy acceptance of earthquake survivors in China

IE and EM 2009 - Proceedings 2009 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1269-1273

  Wu, Xuanna ^a,b   Wang, Erping ^b   Xu, Hua ^c,d   Zhou, Jiashu ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^c BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collective outcome favorability; Policy acceptance; Procedural justice; Risk management

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS METHOD; COLLECTIVE OUTCOME FAVORABILITY; FIELD STUDIES; HIERARCHICAL REGRESSION; IMPACT MECHANISM; POSITIVE EFFECTS; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL RISKS; SOCIAL STABILITY;

EARTHQUAKES; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; PUBLIC POLICY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ANALYSIS;

RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77949465075     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICIEEM.2009.5344447     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Blau, P, Exchange and power in social life, Wiley, New York (1964).
2. Greenberg, J., Using Socially Fair Treatment to Promote Acceptance of a Work Site Smoking Ban, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), P.289-297 (1994).
3. Brockner, J., Chen, Y.R., Mannix, E.A., Leung, K. and Skarlicki, D.P., Culture and Procedural Fairness: When the Effects of What You Do Depend on How You Do It, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), P. 138-159 (2000).
4. Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R., The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York (1988).
5. Thibault, J. and Walker, L., Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, NJ: Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1975).
6. Colquitt, J. A., On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, P.386-400 (2001).
7. Folger, R., Distributive and Procedural Justice: Combined Impact of "Voice" and Improvement of Experienced Inequity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, P.108-119(1977).
8. Folger, R. and Cropanzano, R., Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1998).
9. Brockner, J. and Wiesenfeld, B.M., An Integrative Framework for Explaining Reactions to Decisions: Interactive Effects of Outcomes and Procedures, Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), P. 189-208 (1996).
10. Cremer, D.D. and Knippenberg, D.V., Cooperation with Leaders In Social Dilemmas: On the Effects of Procedural Fairness and Outcome Favorability in Structural Cooperation, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, P. 1-11(2003).
11. Terry, D.J. and Hogg, M.A., Group Norms and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship: A Role for Group Identification, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, P.776-793 (1996).
12. Platow, M., Hoar, S., Reid, S., Harley, K. and Morrison, D., Endorsement of Distributively Fair and Unfair Leaders in Interpersonal and Intergroup Situations, European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, P.465- 494 (1997).
13. Leung, K., Tong, K. and Lind, E.A., Realpolitik versus Fair Process: Moderating Effects of Group Identification on Acceptance of Political Decisions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, P.476-489 (2007).
14. See, K.E., Reactions to Decisions With Uncertain Consequences: Reliance on Perceived Fairness Versus Predicted Outcomes Depends on Knowledge, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), P. 104-118 (2009).
15. Greenberg, J. and Colquitt, J.A., Handbook of Organizational Justice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ (2006).
16. Mayer, D.M., Greenbaum, R.L. and Kuenzi, M., When Do Fair Procedures Not Matter? A Test of the Identity Violation Effect, Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), P. 142-161 (2009).
17. Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O.L.H. and Ng, K.Y., Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, P.425-445 (2001).
18. Cohen, J. and Cohen, P., Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1983).
19. Brockner, J., Making Sense of Procedural Fairness: How High Procedural Fairness can Reduce or Heighten the Influence of Outcome Favorability, Academy of Management Review, 27, P.58-76 (2002).