A comparison of welfare estimates from four models for linking seasonal recreational trips to multinomial logit models of site choice

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 143-157

  Parsons, George R ^a   Jakus, Paul M ^b   Tomasi, Ted ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^c ENTRIX INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGY; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; WELFARE ECONOMICS;

EID: 0032835027     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1999.1083     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bockstael N. E., Hanemann W. M., Kling C. L. Estimating the value of water quality improvements in a recreational demand framework. Water Resour. Res. 23:1987;951-960.
2. Feather P., Hellerstein D., Tomasi T. A discrete-count model of recreation demand. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 29:1995;214-227.
3. Greene W. H. Econometric Analysis. 1993;Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
4. Hausman J. A., Leonard G. K., McFadden D. A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count model: Assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage. J. Public Econom. 56:1995;1-30.
5. Hellerstein D., Mendelsohn R. A theoretical foundation for count data models. Am. J. Agric. Econom. 75:1993;604-611.
6. Herriges J., Kling C., Phaneuf D. Corner soultion models of recreation demand: A comparison of competing frameworks. Herriges J., Kling C. Valuing Recreation and the Environment. 1999;Edward Elgar, Northampton.
7. Jakus P. M., Downing M., Bevelhimer M., Fly J. Do sportfish consumption advisories affect reservoir anglers' site choice? Agric. Resour. Econom. Rev. 26:1997;196-204.
8. Krinsky I., Robb A. L. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev. Econom. Statist. 68:1986;715-719.
9. Lindgren B. W. Statistical Theory. 1968;Macmillan, New York.
10. Morey E. R., Rowe R. D., Watson M. A repeated nested-logit model of Atlantic salmon fishing. Am. J. Agric. Econom. 75:1993;578-592.
11. Parsons G. R., Kealy M. J. A demand theory for number of trips in a random utility model of recreation. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 29:1995;357-367.
12. Poe G. L., Severance-Lossin E. K., Welsh M. P. Measuring the difference (X-Y) of simulated distributions: A convolutions approach. Am. J. Agric. Econom. 76:1994;904-915.
13. J. Shonkwiler, and, D. Shaw, The aggregation of conditional demand systems, paper presented at the annual W133 Regional Project Annual Meetings, 1997.
14. Small K. A., Rosen H. S. Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica. 49:1981;105-130.
15. V. K. Smith, Combining discrete choice and count data models: A comment, manuscript, Duke University, 1997.
16. T. Tomasi, and, F. Lupi, Welfare measures for random utility models of seasonal recreation demand, manuscript, University of Delaware, 1996.
17. Terza J. V., Wilson P. W. Analyzing frequencies of several types of events: A mixed multinominal-poison approach. Rev. Econom. Statist. 72:1990;108-115.