Improving osseointegration of dental implants

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 241-256

  Elias, Carlos Nelson ^a   Meirelles, Luiz ^b  

^a MILITARY INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone formation; Dental implant; Nanostructure; Osseointegration; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOMATERIAL; FLUORAPATITE; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; HYDROXYAPATITE; SODIUM HYDROXIDE; TITANIUM;

BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BIOMECHANICS; BONE MATURATION; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIVISION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY; MACHINE; METAL IMPLANTATION; NANOANALYSIS; NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE REPAIR; TOOTH DEVELOPMENT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TORQUE;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 77949354636     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: 17452422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/erd.09.74     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Bartlett D. Implants for life? A critical review of implant-supported restorations. J. Dent. 35(10), 768-772 (2007).
2. Creugers NH, Kreulen CM, Snoek PA, De Kanter RJ. A systematic review of single-tooth restorations supported by implants. J. Dent. 28(4), 209-217 (2000).
3. Pye AD, Lockhart DE, Dawson MP, Murray CA, Smith AJ. A review of dental implants and infection. J. Hosp. Infect. 72(2), 104-110 (2009).
4. Brånemark Pi, Hansson BO, Adell R et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Suppl. 16, 1-132 (1977).
5. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lundkvist S, Rockler B. Osseointegrated titanium fxtures in the treatment of edentulousness. Biomaterials 4(1), 25-28 (1983).
6. Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Quintessence, Chicago, IL, USA (1985).
7. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Immediate and early implant loading protocols: a literature review of clinical studies. J. Prosthet. Dent. 94(3), 242-258 (2005).
8. Chiapasco M. Early and immediate restoration and loading of implants in completely edentulous patients. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 19(Suppl.), 76-91 (2004).
9. Ioannidou E, Doufexi A. Does loading time affect implant survival? A meta-analysis of 1,266 implants. J. Periodontol. 76(8), 1252-1258 (2005).
10. Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion. Acta Biomater. 1(2), 211-222 (2005).
11. Wennerberg A. The importance of surface roughness for implant incorporation. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manufact. 38(5-6), 657-662 (1998).
12. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Reichl R, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials 25(18), 4087-4103 (2004).
13. Elias CN, Oshida Y, Lima JH, Muller CA. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 1(3), 234-242 (2008).
14. Tete S, Mastrangelo F, Traini T et al. A macro-and nanostructure evaluation of a novel dental implant. Implant. Dent. 17(3), 309-320 (2008).
15. Zhang S, Yan L, Altman M et al. Biological surface engineering: a simple system for cell pattern formation. Biomaterials 20(13), 1213-1220 (1999).
16. Hench LL, Jones JR. Biomaterials Artifcial Organs and Tissue Engineering. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK (2005).
17. Kokubo T, Kim HM, Kawashita M, Nakamura T. Bioactive metals: preparation and properties. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 15(2), 99-107 (2004).
18. Osborn JF, Newesely H. Dynamic aspects of the implant-bone-interface. In: Dental Implants. Heimke G (Ed.). Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich, Germany 111-123 (1979).
19. Yan W. Nanocoating for orthopaedic and dental application. In: Nanocomposite Thin Films and Coating: Processing, Properties and Performance. Zhang S, Ali N (Eds). Imperial College Press, London, UK 573-588 (2007).
20. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop. Scand. 52(2), 155-170 (1981).
21. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 17(2), 137-146 (1996).
22. Schliephake H, Aref A, Scharnweber D, Bierbaum S, Roessler S, Sewing A. Effect of immobilized bone morphogenic protein 2 coating of titanium implants on peri-implant bone formation. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 16(5), 563-569 (2005).
23. Silva FC, Menezes GC. Osteoblasts attachment and adhesion: how bone cells ft fbronectin-coated surfaces. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Bio. S. 24(5), 637-641 (2004).
24. Anderson JM. Biological responses to materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 31, 81-110 (2001).
25. Nebe B, Luthen F, Lange R, Becker P, Beck U, Rychly J. Topography-induced alterations in adhesion structures affect mineralization in human osteoblasts on titanium. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Bio. S. 24(5), 619-624 (2004).
26. Lim JY, Liu X, Vogler EA, Donahue HJ. Systematic variation in osteoblast adhesion and phenotype with substratum surface characteristics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 68(3), 504-512 (2004).
27. Thull R. Physicochemical principles of tissue material interactions. Biomol. Eng. 19(2-6), 43-50 (2002).
28. Scheideler L, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Kern D et al. Investigation of cell reactions to microstructured implant surfaces. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Bio. S. 23(3), 455-459 (2003).
29. Eisenbarth E, Velten D, Schenk-Meuser K et al. Interactions between cells and titanium surfaces. Biomol. Eng. 19(2-6), 243-249 (2002).
30. Eriksson C, Lausmaa J, Nygren H. Interactions between human whole blood and modifed tio2-surfaces: infuence of surface topography and oxide thickness on leukocyte adhesion and activation. Biomaterials 22(14), 1987-1996 (2001).
31. Hennessy KM, Pollot BE, Clem WC et al. The effect of collagen i mimetic peptides on mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and differentiation, and on bone formation at hydroxyapatite surfaces. Biomaterials 30(10), 1898-1909 (2009).
32. Brunette DM. Principle of cell behaviour on titanium surfaces and their application to implanted devices. In: Titanium in Medicine. Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P (Eds). Spinger Verlag, Berlin, Germany 485-512 (2001).
33. Holgers KM, Esposito M, Kalltorp M, Thomsen P. Titanium in soft tissue. In: Titanium In Medicine. Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P (Eds). Spinger Verlag, Berlin, Germany 513-560 (2001).
34. Kanagaraja S, Alaeddine S, Eriksson C et al. Surface characterization, protein adsorption, and initial cell-surface reactions on glutathione and 3-mercapto-1,2,-propanediol immobilized to gold. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 46(4), 582-591 (1999).
35. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 21(7), 667-681 (2000).
36. Damsky CH. Extracellular matrix-integrin interactions in osteoblast function and tissue remodeling. Bone 25(1), 95-96 (1999).
37. Qu Z, Rausch-Fan X, Wieland M, Matejka M, Schedle A. The initial attachment and subsequent behavior regulation of osteoblasts by dental implant surface modifcation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 82(3), 658-668 (2007).
38. Zollner A, Ganeles J, Korostoff J, Guerra F, Krafft T, Bragger U. Immediate and early non-occlusal loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modifed surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: Interim results from a prospective multicenter randomized-controlled study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 19(5), 442-450 (2008).
39. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, De Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modifcation of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 76(2), 323-334 (2006).
40. Ismail FS, Rohanizadeh R, Atwa S et al. The infuence of surface chemistry and topography on the contact guidance of mg63 osteoblast cells. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 18(5), 705-714 (2007).
41. Walivaara B, Aronsson BO, Rodahl M, Lausmaa J, Tengvall P. Titanium with different oxides: In vitro studies of protein adsorption and contact activation. Biomaterials 15(10), 827-834 (1994).
42. Granstrom G. Radiotherapy, osseointegration and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Periodontol 2000 33, 145-162 (2003).
43. Wennerberg A. On Surface Roughness and Implant Incorporation (PhD thesis). University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden (1996).
44. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 13(3), 252-259 (2002).
45. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 12(4), 486-494 (1997).
46. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 8(6), 442-447 (1997).
47. Dos Santos MV, Elias CN, Cavalcanti Lima JH. The effects of superfcial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
48. Boyan BD, Dean DD, Lohmann CH. The titanium bone cell interface in vitro: the role of the surface in promoting osteointegration. In: Titanium in Medicine. Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P (Eds). Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany (2001).
49. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 40(1), 1-11 (1998).
50. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Infuence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 25(7), 889-902 (1991).
51. London RM, Roberts FA, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O'Neal RB. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, tps, and ha surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 17(3), 369-376 (2002).
52. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 15(3), 331-344 (2000).
53. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. An animal study of cp titanium screws with different surface topographies. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 6(5), 302-309 (1995).
54. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int. J. Prosthodont. 17(5), 536-543 (2004).
55. Takeuchi K, Saruwatari L, Nakamura HK, Yang JM, Ogawa T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 72(3), 296-305 (2005).
56. Leduc P, Wang Y. Protein adsorption at the biomaterial/tissue interface. In: An Introduction to Biomaterials. Guelcher SA, Hollinger JO (Ed.), The Biomedical Materials Series. CRC Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 47-61 (2006).
57. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 20(13), 1221-1227 (1999).
58. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 25(19), 4731-4739 (2004).
59. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 21(17), 1803-1810 (2000).
60. De Oliveira PT, Nanci A. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials 25(3), 403-413 (2004).
61. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Aronsson BO et al. Bone response to surface-modifed titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials 17(6), 605-616 (1996).
62. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Lausmaa J, Rodahl M, Kasemo B, Ericson LE. Bone response to surface modifed titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. Biomaterials 15(13), 1062-1074 (1994).
63. Larsson C, Emanuelsson L, Thomsen P et al. Bone response to surface modifed titanium implants-studies on the tissue response after 1 year to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 8(12), 721-729 (1997).
64. Wojciak-Stothard B, Curtis A, Monaghan W, Macdonald K, Wilkinson C. Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. Exp. Cell Res. 223(2), 426-435 (1996).
65. Dalby MJ, Yarwood SJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone HJ, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. Increasing fbroblast response to materials using nanotopography: morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands. Exp. Cell Res. 276(1), 1-9 (2002).
66. Andersson AS, Backhed F, Von Euler A, Richter-Dahlfors A, Sutherland D, Kasemo B. Nanoscale features infuence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production. Biomaterials 24(20), 3427-3436 (2003).
67. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. Biomaterials 23(14), 2945-2954 (2002).
68. Riehle MO, Dalby MJ, Johnstone H, Macintosh A, Affrossman S. Cell behaviour of rat calvarial bone cells on surfaces with random nanometric features. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Bio. S. 23(3), 337-340 (2003).
69. Dalby MJ, Mccloy D, Robertson M et al. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. Biomaterials 27(15), 2980-2987 (2006).
70. Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 28(32), 4748-4755 (2007).
71. Goené RJ, Testori T, Trisi P. Infuence of a nanometer-scale surface enhancement on de novo bone formation on titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in human maxillae. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 27(3), 211-219 (2007).
72. Meirelles L. On Nano Size Structures for Enhanced Early Bone Formation. PhD Thesis. Göteborgs University, Göterborgs, Sweden (2007).
73. Meirelles L, Arvidsson A, Andersson M, Kjellin P, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Nano hydroxyapatite structures infuence early bone formation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 87(2), 299-307 (2008).
74. Meirelles L, Melin L, Peltola T et al. Effect of hydroxyapatite and titania nanostructures on early in vivo bone response. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 10(4), 245-254 (2008).
75. Meirelles L, Currie F, Jacobsson M, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifcations on the early stages of osseointegration. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 23(4), 641-647 (2008).
76. 2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 27(6), 926-936 (2006).
77. De Assis AF, Beloti MM, Crippa GE, De Oliveira PT, Morra M, Rosa AL. Development of the osteoblastic phenotype in human alveolar bone-derived cells grown on a collagen type I-coated titanium surface. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20(3), 240-246 (2009).
78. Franco RL, Chiesa R, Beloti Mm, De Oliveira PT, Rosa AL. Human osteoblastic cell response to a Ca-and P-enriched titanium surface obtained by anodization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 88(4), 841-848 (2009).
79. Franco Rde L, Chiesa R, De Oliveira PT, Beloti MM, Rosa AL. Bone response to a Ca-and P-enriched titanium surface obtained by anodization. Braz. Dent. J. 19(1), 15-20 (2008).
80. Granato R, Marin C, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Janal MN, Coelho PG. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of a thin ion beam bioceramic deposition on plateau root form implants: an experimental study in dogs. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 90(1), 396-403 (2009).
81. 2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 28(36), 5418-5425 (2007).
82. Mendonca G, Mendonca DB, Simoes LG et al. The effects of implant surface nanoscale features on osteoblast-specifc gene expression. Biomaterials 30(25), 4053-4062 (2009).
83. Mendonca G, Mendonca DB, Simoes LG et al. Nanostructured alumina-coated implant surface: effect on osteoblast-related gene expression and bone-to-implant contact in vivo. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 24(2), 205-215 (2009).
84. Monjo M, Lamolle SF, Lyngstadaas SP, Ronold HJ, Ellingsen JE. In vivo expression of osteogenic markers and bone mineral density at the surface of fuoride-modifed titanium implants. Biomaterials 29(28), 3771-3780 (2008).
85. 2 enhances contact osteogenesis. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 18(4), 452-458 (2007).
86. Vetrone F, Variola F, Tambasco De Oliveira P et al. Nanoscale oxidative patterning of metallic surfaces to modulate cell activity and fate. Nano Lett. 9(2), 659-665 (2009).
87. Mendonca G, Mendonca DB, Aragao FJ, Cooper LF. Advancing dental implant surface technology from micro to nanotopography. Biomaterials 29(28), 3822-3835 (2008).
88. Jayaraman M, Meyer U, Buhner M, Joos U, Wiesmann HP. Infuence of titanium surfaces on attachment of osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Biomaterials 25(4), 625-631 (2004).
89. Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Keller J, Stanford C. Differentiation of preosteoblasts is affected by implant surface microtopographies. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 69(3), 462-468 (2004).
90. Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Herten M et al. Effects of surface hydrophilicity and microtopography on early stages of soft and hard tissue integration at non-submerged titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs. J. Periodontol. 78(11), 2171-2184 (2007).
91. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modifed SLA titanium surface. J. Dent. Res. 83(7), 529-533 (2004).
92. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 74(1), 49-58 (2005).
93. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fuoride-modifed titanium implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 19(5), 659-666 (2004).
94. Sun L, Berndt CC, Gross KA, Kucuk A. Material fundamentals and clinical performance of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings: a review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 58(5), 570-592 (2001).
95. Faeda RS, Tavares HS, Sartori R, Guastaldi AC, Marcantonio E Jr. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modifcation by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 67(8), 1706-1715 (2009).
96. Braceras I, De Maeztu MA, Alava JI, Gay-Escoda C. In vivo low-density bone apposition on different implant surface materials. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 38(3), 274-278 (2009).
97. Askeland DRP. The Science and Engineering of Materials. Thomson Canada Limited, ON, Canada (2006).
98. Jarmar T, Palmquist A, Brånemark R, Hermansson L, Engqvist H, Thomsen P. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 10(1), 11-22 (2008).
99. Ellingsen JE. Pre-treatment of titanium implants with fuoride improves their retention in bone. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 6, 749-753 (1995).
100. Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Formation and characterization of anodic titanium oxide flms containing Ca and P. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29(1), 65-72 (1995).
101. 2 nanoparticles (anatase, brookite and rutile): thermohydrolysis and oxidation in aqueous medium. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 68, 695-700 (2007).
102. Busquim TP, Elias CN, May JE, Kuri SE. Titanium oxide layer on the surface of anodized dental implants. Presented at: 2009 Materials & Processes for Medical Devices Conference. Minneapolis, MN, USA, August 10-12 (2009).
103. Gurgel BC, Goncalves PF, Pimentel SP et al. An oxidized implant surface may improve bone-to-implant contact in pristine bone and bone defects treated with guided bone regeneration: an experimental study in dogs. J. Periodontol. 79(7), 1225-1231 (2008).
104. Sul Y T, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Int. J. Prosthodont. 19(4), 319-328 (2006).
105. Goransson A, Arvidsson A, Currie F et al. An in vitro comparison of possibly bioactive titanium implant surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 88(4), 1037-1047 (2009).
106. Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Nishiguchi S, Nakamura T. Graded surface structure of bioactive titanium prepared by chemical treatment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 45(2), 100-107 (1999).