Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 234-242

  Elias, Carlos Nelson ^a   Oshida, Yoshiki ^b,c   Lima, José Henrique Cavalcanti ^d   Muller, Carlos Alberto ^e  

^a MILITARY INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING   (Brazil)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Syracuse University   (United States)

^d INCO 25 ^*  (Brazil)

^e INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Contact angle; Dental implant; Implant roughness; Removal torque; Surface implant treatment; Wettability

Indexed keywords

IMPLANT ROUGHNESS; REMOVAL TORQUE; SURFACE IMPLANT TREATMENT;

CONTACT ANGLE; OXIDE FILMS; SURFACE TREATMENT; TITANIUM ALLOYS; TORQUE MEASUREMENT; WETTING;

DENTAL PROSTHESES;

OXIDE; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CONTACT ANGLE; FILM; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RABBIT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TORQUE; WETTABILITY;

ADHESIVENESS; ANIMALS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DEVICE REMOVAL; ELASTIC MODULUS; HARDNESS; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM; TORQUE; WETTABILITY;

EID: 49949151805     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Albrektsson T., and Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2 - Review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surface. Int. J. Prosthodont. 17 (2004) 544
2. Albrektsson T., and Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int. J. Prosthodont. 17 (2004) 536
3. Black J. Biological performance: Fundamentals of biocompatibility (2006), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
4. Boyna B.D., Dean D.D., and Lohmann C.H. The titanium bone cell interface in vitro: The role of the surface in promoting osteointegration. In: Brunette D.M., Tengvall P., Textor M., and Thomsen P. (Eds). Titanium in Medicine (2001), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
5. Brunette D.M. The effect of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 3 (1988) 231
6. Brunette D.M. Principles of cells behaviour on Ti surfaces. In: Brunette, et al. (Ed). Titanium Medicine (2001), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 485
7. Buser D., Martin W., and Belser W.M. Optimizing esthetic for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 19 suppl (2004) 43
8. Chehroudi B., McDonnell D., and Brunette D.M. The effects of micromachined surfaces on formation of bonelike tissue on subcutaneous implants as assessed by radiography and computer image processing. J. Biomed Mater. Res. 34 (1997) 279
9. Cochran D.L., and Morton D. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding, loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 19 Suppl (2004) 109
10. Elias C.N., Figueira D.C., and Rios P.R. Influence of the coating material on the loosing of dental implant abutment screw joints. Mat. Sc. Eng. C 26 (2006) 1361
11. Ellingsen J.E., Johansson C.B., Wennerberg A., and Holmen A. Improved retention and bone implant contact with fluoride modified titanium implant. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 19 (2004) 659
12. Feng B., Weng B.J., Yang B.C., Qu S.X., and Zhang X.D. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblast. Biomaterials 24 (2003) 4663
13. Geis-Gerstorfer J., Lindmann W., and Scheider L. In vitro screening of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. Apresented at the 10th Int Friadent Symposium, 16-17 May 2003, Mannheim, Germany, as Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Int. J. Prostodont. 17 (2004) 536
14. Lim Y.J., and Oshida Y. Initial contact angle measurements on variously treated dental/medical titanium materials. Biomed. Mat. Eng. 11 (2001) 325-341
15. Lim Y.J., Oshida Y., Andres C.J., and Barco M.T. Surface characterization of variously treated titanium materials. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 16 (2002) 333-342
16. Macak, J.M., Tsuchiya, H., Ghicov, A., Yasuda, K., Hahn, R., Bauer, S., Schmuki, P., 2007. TiO2 nanotubes: Self-organized electrochemical formation, properties and applications. Curr. Opinion Solid State Mater. Sci. (in press). Available online 1 October 2007
17. Martin J.Y., Schwartz Z., Hummert T.W., Schraub D.M., Simpson J., Lankford D., Dean D.D., Cochran D.L., and Boyan D.B. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29 (1995) 389
18. Morais L.S., Serra G.G., Muller C.A., Andrade L.R., Palermo E.F.A., Elias C.N., and Meyers M.A. Titanium alloy mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: Immediate loading and metal ion release. Acta Biomater. 3 (2007) 331
19. Ogawa T., Sukotjo C., and Nishimura I. Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. J. Prosthodont. 11 (2002) 241
20. Rosenberg E.S., Dent H.D., Cho S.C., Elian N., Jalbout Z.N., Froum S., and Evian C.I. A comparison of characteristics of implant failure and survival in periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 19 (2004) 873
21. Schwartz Z., Martin J.Y., Dean D.D., Simpson J., Cochran D.L., and Boyan D.B. Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production, and differentiation depends on the state of cell maturation. J. Biomed Mater. Res. 30 (1996) 145
22. Strnad J., Strnad Z., Šestak J., Urban K., and Povýšil C. Bio-activated titanium surface utilizable for mimetic bone implantation in dentistry-Part III: Surface characteristics and bone-implant contact formation. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 68 (2007) 841
23. Sul, Y., On the bone response to oxidized titanium implants, Ph.D. Thesis, Götenborg University. 2002
24. Sul Y., Johansson C.B., and Albrektsson T. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 17 (2002) 625
25. Suzuki K., Aoki K., and Ohya K. Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling. Bone 21 (1997) 507
26. Sycaras N., Woody R.D., Iacopino A.M., Triplett R.G., and Jun M.E. Osseointegration of dental implants complexed with rhBMP-2: A comparative histomorphometric and radiographic evaluation. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 19 (2004) 667
27. Takeuchi K., Saruwatari L., Nakamura H.K., Yang J., and Ogawa T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 72A (2005) 296
28. Upp F., Scheideler L., Olshanska N., de Wld M., Wieland M., and Geis-Gesttorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through modification of microstructured titanium implant surface. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 76 (2006) 323
29. Webb K., Hlady V., and Tresco P.A. Relative importance of surface wettability and changed functional groups on NH3T3 fibroblasts attachment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 241 (1998) 422
30. Wong M., and Eulenberger J. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29 (1995) 1567