Less invasive indicators of changes in thermodilution cardiac output by ventilatory changes after cardiac surgery

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 863-867

  Breukers, Rose Marieke B ^a,b   Willems, Jore H ^a   Wilde, Rob De ^b   Jansen, Jos R C ^b   Johan Groeneveld, A B ^a,c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cardiac surgery; Modelflow; Positive end expiratory pressure; Pulse contour cardiac output; Stroke volume variation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART SURGERY; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; THERMODILUTION; TIDAL VOLUME;

BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; STROKE VOLUME; THERMODILUTION; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 77949292990     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832ac5fe     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Reuter DA, FelbingerTW, Schmidt C, etal. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:392-398.
2. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW, et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:1399-1404.
3. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, et al. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004; 126:1563-1568.
4. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93:782-788.
5. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31 :517 -523.
6. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128:848 -854.
7. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the respiratory systolic variation test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:746-755.
8. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, et al. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22:658 -665.
9. Rex S, Schälte G, Schroth S, et al. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac preload during open heart surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51 :1258-1267.
10. Auler JO, Galas F, Hajjar L, et al. Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1201-1206.
11. Michard F, ChemlaD, Richard C, etal. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159:935-939.
12. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Kilger E, et al. Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations. Comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:124-126.
13. Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, etal. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:476-480.
14. Charron C, Fessenemeyer C, Cosson C, etal. The influence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2006; 102:1511 -1517.
15. De Blasi RA, Palmisani S, Cigognetti L, et al. Effects ofsternotomy on heart- lung interaction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery receiving pressure- controlled mechanical ventilation. Acta AnaesthesiolScand 2007; 51 :441 -446.
16. Luecke T, Pelosi P. Clinical review: positive end-expiratory pressure and cardiac output. Crit Care 2005; 9:607 -621. (Pubitemid 43174471)
17. Pizov R, Cohen M, Weiss Y, etal. Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced hemodynamic changes are reflected in the arterial pressure waveform. Crit Care Med 1996; 24:1381-1387.
18. Kubitz JC, Annecke T, Kemming GI, et al. The influence of positive end- expiratory pressure on stroke volume variation and central blood volume during open and closed chest conditions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30:90-95.
19. Veillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Augarde R, et al. Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support revisited by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 168:671 -676.
20. Kubitz JC, Annecke T, Forkl S, et al. Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation during modifications of cardiac afterload. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:591-597.
21. De Vaal JB, de Wilde RB, van den Berg PCM, et al. Less invasive determination of cardiac output from the arterial pressure by aortic diameter-calibrated pulse contour. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:326-331.
22. De Wilde RB, Schreuder JJ, van den Berg PC, Jansen JR. An evaluation of cardiac output by five arterial pulse contour techniques during cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2007; 62:760-768.
23. Jellema WT, Wesseling KH, Groeneveld AB, et al. Continuous cardiac output in septic shock by simulating a model ofthe aortic input impedance: a comparison with bolus injection thermodilution. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1317-1328.
24. Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Goedhard WJ. The static elastic properties of 45 human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new model. J Biomech 1984; 17:425-435.
25. Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monitor Comput 1999; 15:85-91.
26. Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, et al. Cardiac index measurements during rapid preload changes: a comparison of pulmonary artery thermodilution with arterial pulse contour analysis. J Clin Anesth 2005; 17:241-248.