If i follow the teachers' editions, isn't that enough? Analyzing reading volume in six core reading programs

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 347-363

  Brenner, Devon ^a   Hiebert, Elfrieda H ^b  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749302184     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/648982     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Afflerbach, P., Beers, J. W., Blachowicz, C., Boyd, C. D., Cheyney, W., Diffily, D., et al. (2004). Scott Foresman Reading. Glenview, IL: Pearson Education.
2. Afflerbach, P., Blachowicz, C. L. Z., Boyd, C. D., Cheyney, W., Juel, C., Kame'enui, E. J., et al. (2007). Reading street. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
3. Allington, R. L. (1977). If they don't read much, how they ever gonna get good? Journal of Reading, 21, 57-61.
4. Allington, R. L. (1984). Content coverage and contextual reading in reading groups. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16(1), 85-96.
5. Allington, R. L. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers. New York: AddisonWesley.
6. Allington, R. L. (2002). Big brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Allington, R. L. (2009). If they don't read much ⋯ 30 years later. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 30-54). New York: Guilford.
8. Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 285-303.
9. Baumann, J. F., Hoffman, J. V., Duffy-Hester, A. M., & Ro, J. (2000). The first R yesterday and today: U.S. elementary reading instruction practices reported by teachers and administrators. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 338-377.
10. Beck, I. L., Farr, R. C., & Strickland, D. S. (2003). Harcourt Trophies. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
11. Bereiter, C., Brown, A., Campione, J., Carruthers, I., Case, R., Hirshberg, J., et al. (2002). SRA Open Court Reading. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
12. Block, C. C., Cleveland, M. D., & Reed, K. M. (2006). Using books to raise student achievement: 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 6th grade study 2003-2004. In Scholastic (Ed.), Scholastic classroom books compendium of research (pp. 18-36). New York: Scholastic.
13. Bloom, B. (1971). Mastery learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
14. Brenner, D., & Hiebert, E. H. (2008, December). The impact of professional development focusing on time spent reading on teaching practices in third grade classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL.
15. Brenner, D., Hiebert, E. H., & Tompkins, R. (2009). How much and what are third graders reading? Reading in core programs. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 118-140). New York: Guilford.
16. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
17. Chall, J. S., & Squire, J. R. (1991). The publishing industry and textbooks. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 120-146). New York: Longman.
18. Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B. J., Schatschneider, C., & Underwood, P. (2007). Algorithm-guided individualized reading instruction. Science, 315, 464-465.
19. Cooper, J. D., Pikulski, J. J., Ackerman, P. A., Au, K. H., Chard, D. J., Garcia, G. G., et al. (2004). Houghton Mifflin Reading: Mississippi. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). The impact of print exposure on word recognition. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 235-262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Dole, J. A., & Osborn, J. (2003). Elementary language arts textbooks: A decade of change. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, & J. R. Squire (Eds.), Handbook for research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 631-639). New York: Macmillan.
22. Eliot, C. W. (1898). Educational reform. New York: Century.
23. Engelmann, S., & Hanner, S. (2002). SRA Read- ing Mastery Plus. Columbus, OH: SRA/ McGraw-Hill.
24. Ericsson, K., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
25. Fisher, C. W., Berliner, D. C., Filby, N. N., Marliave, R., Cahen, L. S., & Dishaw, M. M. (1980). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time, and student achievement: An overview. In C. Denham & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Time to learn (pp. 7-32). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
26. Fisher, D., & Ivey, G. (2006). Evaluating the interventions for struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50(3), 180-189.
27. Flood, J., Hasbrouck, J. E., Hoffman, J. V., Lapp, D., Lucker, D., Medearis, A. S., et al. (2003). Macmillan/McGraw-Hill Reading. New York: Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
28. Foorman, B. R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M. N., Fletcher, J. M., Moats, L. C., & Francis, D. J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 1-29.
29. Frederick, W., Easton, J., Muirhead, S., & Vanderwicken, S. (1979, April). Procedures and use of time in reading classes in high-gain and low-gain elementary schools in Chicago. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 176237)
30. Gates, A. I. (1930). Interest and ability in reading. New York: Macmillan.
31. Gunn, B. (July 14, 2004). Fidelity of implementation: Developing structures for improving the implementation of core, supplemental, and intervention programs. Presentation at the Reading First National Conference, Minneapolis. Retrieved September 21, 2009, from http://www.nevadareading.org/ resourcecenter/readingprograms.attachment/300169/Program-Implementation- FidelityDeveloping-Structures.ppt
32. Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(1), 1-28.
33. Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Huang, C. (2001). Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced instruction on the NAEP. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 145-162.
34. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 231-256.
35. Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636-644.
36. Hiebert, E. H. (2009). The (mis)match between texts and students who depend on schools to become literate. In E. H. Hiebert &M. Sailors (Eds.), Finding the right texts for beginning and struggling readers: Research-based solutions (pp. 1-21). New York: Guilford.
37. Hiebert, E. H., & Martin, L. A. (2009). Opportunity to read: A critical but neglected construct in reading instruction. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 3-29). New York: Guilford.
38. Hunt, L. C. (1970). Effects of self-selection, interest and motivation on independent, instructional, and frustration levels. Reading Teacher, 24, 146-151.
39. Kim, J. S., & White, T. G. (2008). Scaffolding voluntary summer reading for children in grades 3 to 5: An experimental study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 1-23.
40. Kuhn, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. (2009). Time, engagement, and support: Lessons from a four-year fluency intervention. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 141-160). New York: Guilford.
41. Lee, J., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. (2007). The nation's report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007-496). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
42. Lewis, M. (2002). Read more-read better? A metaanalysis of the literature on the relationship between exposure to reading and reading achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
43. Maryland State Department of Education. (2008). Final report of the Maryland Committee for reviewing core reading programs. Retrieved September 21, 2009, from http://www. marylandpublicschools.org/NR/rdonlyres/ D4445574-A974-42BD-A186-B6787699F74F/ 17615/MD-Committee-for-Reviewing-Core- Reading-Program-Fi.pdf
44. McGill-Franzen, A., Zmach, C., Solic, K., & Zeig, J. L. (2006). The confluence of two policy mandates: Programs and third-grade retention in Florida. Elementary School Journal, 107(1), 67-91.
45. Moody, S. W., Schumm, J. S., Fischer, M., & Jean-Francois, B. (1999). Grouping suggestions for the classroom: What do our basal reading stories tell us? Reading Research and Instruction, 38, 319-331.
46. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47. Opitz, M. F., & Rasinski, T. (1998). Good-bye round robin: 25 Effective oral reading strategies. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
48. Reutzel, D. R., Fawson, P. C., & Smith, J. A. (2008). Reconsidering silent sustained reading (SSR): An exploratory study of scaffolded silent reading (ScRC). Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 37-50.
49. Shannon, P., & Crawford, P. (1997). Manufacturing descent: Basal readers and the creation of reading failures. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13, 227-245.
50. Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2003). A consumer's guide to evaluating a core reading program Grades K-3: A critical elements analysis. Eugene: National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators, Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement, University of Oregon. Retrieved September 21, 2009, from http:// www.doe.virginia.gov/VDOE/Instruction/ Reading/ConsumerGuideReading.pdf
51. Stallings, J. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher, 9(11), 11-16.
52. Taylor, B. M., Frye, B. J., & Maruyama, G. (1990). Time spent reading and reading growth. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 351-362.
53. Taylor, S. E., Frankenpohl, H., & Pettee, J. L. (1960). Grade level norms for the components of the fundamental reading skills. EDL Research and Information Bulletin (No.3). New York: EDL/McGraw-Hill.
54. Tivnan, T., & Hemphill, L. (2005). Comparing four literacy reform models in high-poverty schools: Patterns of first-grade achievement. Elementary School Journal, 105(5), 419-441.
55. Torgesen, J. K. (2004, March). Implementing new discoveries about reading and reading instruction in a coherent reading plan. Presented to faculty and students of the Brigham Young University College of Education, Provo, UT. Retrieved September 21, 2009, from http:// www.fcrr.org/science/ sciencepresentationstorgesen. htm
56. U.S. Congress (2002, January 8). Reading First: No Child Left Behind Act, Public Law 107-110.
57. U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Reading first impact study: Interim report (NCEE 20084016). Washington, DC: IES National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20084016.pdf
58. U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2002). Final Guidance for the Reading First Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from http:// www.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/legislation. html
59. Venezky, R. L. (1984). The history of reading research. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 3-38). New York: Longman.
60. Woodward, A. (1986). Taking teaching out of teaching and reading out of learning to read: A historical study of reading textbook teachers' guides. Publishing Research Quarterly, 2, 53-77.