The effect of job offer timing on offer acceptance, performance, and turnover

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 223-241

  Becker, William J ^a   Connolly, Terry ^b   Slaughter, Jerel E ^b  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649293341     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: 17446570     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01167.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Arvey RD, Gordon M, Massengill D, Mussio S. Differential dropout rates of minority and majority job candidates due to " time lags" between selection procedures. Personnel Psychology 1975, 28:175-180.
2. Arvey RD, Murphy KR. Peformance evaluation in work settings. Annual Review of Psychology 1998, 49:141-168.
3. Boswell WR, Roehling MV, LePine MA, Moynihan LM. Individual job-choice decisions and the impact of job attributes and recruitment practices: A longitudinal field study. Human Resource Management 2003, 42:23-37.
4. Breaugh JA, Starke M. Research on employee recruitment: So many studies, so many remaining questions. Journal of Management 2000, 26:405-434.
5. Bretz RD, Boudreau JW, Judge TA. Job search behavior of employed managers. Personnel Psychology 1994, 47:275-301.
6. Cappelli P. Will there really be a labor shortage?. Human Resource Management 2005, 44:143-149.
7. Carmon Z, Wertenbroch K, Zeelenberg M. Option attachment: When deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research 2003, 30:15-29.
8. Chapman DS, Uggerslev KL, Carroll SA, Piasentin KA, Jones DA. Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:928-944.
9. Chapman DS, Webster J. Toward an integrated model of applicant reactions and job choice. International Journal of Human Resource Management 2006, 17:1032-1057.
10. Fehr E, Fischbacher U, Gächter S. Strong reciprocity, human cooperation and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature 2002, 13:1-25.
11. Folger R, Bies RJ. Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Employer Responsibilities and Rights Journal 1989, 2:79-90.
12. Gilliland SW. The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review 1993, 18:694-734.
13. Gilliland SW. Effects of procedural and distributed justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology 1994, 79:691-701.
14. Hausknecht JP, Day DV, Thomas SC. Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An update model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 2004, 57:639-683.
15. Iyengar SS, Lepper MR. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000, 79:995-1006.
16. James LR. Testing hypotheses in the context of the unmeasured variables problem. Human Resources Management Review 1991, 4:273-291.
17. Jones DA, Skarlicki DP. The relationship between perceptions of fairness and voluntary turnover among retail employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2003, 33:1226-1243.
18. Judge TA, Ferris GR. Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal 1993, 36:80-105.
19. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291.
20. Lind EA. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. Advances in organizational justice 2001, 56-88. Greenburg JCropanzano R. In, Eds., Stanford, CA, Stanford University
21. Lockwood NR. Talent management: Driver for organizational success 2006, Alexandria, VA, Society of Human Resources Management
22. Moynihan LM, Roehling MV, LePine MA, Boswell WR. A longitudinal study of the relationships among job search self efficacy, job interviews, and employment outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology 2003, 18:207-233.
23. Ployhart RE, Harold CM. The applicant attribution-reaction theory (AART): An integrative theory of applicant attrubutional processing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2004, 12:84-98.
24. Ployhart RE, Ryan AM. Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: The effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology 1998, 83:3-16.
25. Powell GN. Applicant reactions to the initial employment interview: Exploring theoretical and methodological issues. Personnel Psychology 1991, 44:67-83.
26. Rynes SL, Bretz RD, Gerhart B. The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Personnel Psychology 1991, 44:487-521.
27. Rynes SL, Cable DM. Recruitment research in the twenty-first century. Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology 2003, 12:55-76. Borman DR, Ilgen DR. In, Eds., Vol, New York, Wiley
28. Rynes SL, Orlitzky MO, Bretz RD. Experienced hiring versus college recruiting: Practices and emerging trends. Personnel Psychology 1997, 50:309-339.
29. Saks AM, Ashforth BE. Effects of individual differences and job search behaviors on the employment status of recent university graduates. Journal of Vocational Behavior 1999, 54:335-349.
30. Soelberg PO. Unprogrammed decision making. Industrial Management Review 1967, 8:19-29.
31. Truxillo DM, Bauer TN, Campion MA, Paronto ME. Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Applied Psychology 2002, 87:1020-1031.
32. Turban DB, Campion JE, Eyring AR. Factors related to job acceptance decisions of college recruits. Journal of Vocational Behavior 1995, 47:193-213.
33. Tyler TR, Bies RJ. Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. Applied social psychology and organizational settings 1990, 77-98. Carrol JS, In, Ed., Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
34. Vandenberg RJ, Seo JH. Placing recruiting effectiveness in perspective: A cognition explication of the job-choice and organizational-entry period. Human Resources Management Review 1992, 2:239-273.