Reassessing the link between city structure and fiscal policy: Is the problem poor measures of governmental structure?

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 209-228

  Carr, Jered B ^a   Karuppusamy, Shanthi ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adapted cities; Chief administrative officer; Council manager; Mayor council; Municipal expenditures; Strong mayor; Weak mayor

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649255288     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: 15523357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074009334641     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adrian, C. (1988). Forms of city government in American history. In Municipal yearbook 1988 (pp. 3-11). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
2. Ammons, D. (2008). City manager and city administrator role similarities and differences: Perceptions among persons who have served as both. American Review of Public Administration, 38, 24-40.
3. Benton, J.E. (2003). County government structure and county revenue policy: What's the connection? State and Local Government Review, 35, 78-89.
4. Booms, B. (1966). City government form and public expenditure level. National Tax Journal, 19, 187-199.
5. Carr, J.B., Bae, S., & Lu, W. (2006). City-county government and promises of economic development: A tale of two cities. State and Local Government Review, 38, 259-269.
6. Carr, J.B., & Karuppusamy, S. (2008). The adapted cities framework: On enhancing its use in empirical research. Urban Affairs Review, 43, 875-886.
7. Carr, J.B., & Karuppusamy, S. (2009). Beyond ideal types of municipal structure: Adapted cities in Michigan. American Review of Public Administration 39, 304-321.
8. Carr, J.B., & Sneed, B.G. (2004). The politics of city-county consolidation: Findings from a national survey. In J. B. Carr & R. C. Feiock (Eds.), Reshaping the local government landscape: Perspectives on city-county consolidation and its alternatives (pp. 183-218). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
9. Craw, M. (2008). Taming the local leviathan: Institutional and economic constraints on municipal budgets. Urban Affairs Review, 43, 663-690.
10. Deno, K., & Mehay, S. (1987). Municipal management structures and fiscal performance: Do city managers make a difference? Southern Economic Journal, 53, 627-642.
11. DeSantis, V., & Renner, T. (2002). City government structures: An attempt at clarification. State and Local Government Review, 34, 95-104.
12. Duvall, J. (1999). Contemporary choices for citizens. In R. Kemp (Ed.), Forms of local government: A handbook on city, county and regional options (pp. 63-68). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
13. Dye, T., & Garcia, J.A. (1978). Structure, function, and policy in American cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14, 103-122.
14. Feiock, R.C. (2007). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29, 47-63.
15. Feiock, R.C., Jeong, M.G., & Kim, J. (2003). Credible commitment and council-manager government: Implications for policy instrument choices. Public Administration Review, 63, 616-625.
16. Frederickson, H.G., & Johnson, G. (2001). The adapted American city: A research note. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 872-884.
17. Frederickson, H.G., Johnson, G., & Wood, C. (2004a). The changing structure of American cities: A study of the diffusion of innovation. Public Administration Review, 64, 320-330.
18. Frederickson, H.G., Johnson, G., & Wood, C. (2004b). The adapted city: Institutional dynamics and structural change. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
19. Frederickson, H.G., Logan, B., & Wood, C. (2003). Municipal reform in mayor-council cities: A well-kept secret. State and Local Government Review, 35, 7-14.
20. Frederickson, H.G., & Smith, K. (2003). The public administration theory primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21. Hannah, S.B. (1987). Checks and balances in local government: City charter amendments and revisions in Michigan, 1960-1985. Journal of Urban Affairs, 9, 337-353.
22. Hannah, S.B. (1998, April). Form and function in Michigan local government. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
23. Hansell, B. (1998). Is it time to reform the reform? Changes in the council-manager form of government. Public Management, 80, 15-16.
24. Hansell, B. (1999). Reforming the reform: Variations on mayor-council form of government, Part 2. Public Management, 81, 28.
25. Hayes, K., & Chang, S. (1990). The relative efficiency of city manager and mayor-council forms of government. South Economic Journal, 57, 167-177.
26. Hendrick, R. (2008, March). Does form of fiscal governance affect the financial condition of municipal government? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, Dallas, TX.
27. Jung, C. (2006). Forms of government and spending on common municipal functions: A longitudinal approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72, 363-376.
28. Liebert, R. (1974). Municipal functions, structure, and expenditures: A reanalysis of recent research. Social Science Quarterly, 54, 765-783.
29. Lineberry, R., & Fowler, E. (1967). Reformism and public choices in American cities. American Political Science Review, 61, 701-716.
30. Lubell, M., Feiock, R.C., & Rameriz, E. (2005). Political institutions and conservation by local governments. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 706-729.
31. Lyons, W. (1978). Reform and response in American cities: Structure and policy reconsidered. Social Science Quarterly, 59, 118-132.
32. March, J., & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. New York: Free Press.
33. March, J., & Olsen, J. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: Free Press.
34. Marlowe, J., Pandey, S., & Stazyk, E. (2008, March 8-11). Are professional local governments leaner and meaner? The financial performance dividend of professional management. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Public Administration, Dallas, TX.
35. Morgan, D., & Pelissero, J. (1980). Urban policy: Does political structure matter? American Political Science Review, 74, 999-1006.
36. Nelson, K. (2002). Assessing the CAO position in a strong-mayor government. National Civic Review, 91, 41-54.
37. Newland, C. (1995). The future of council-manager government. In H. G. Frederickson (Ed.), Ideal and practice in council-manager government (pp. 263-283). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
38. Protasel, G. (1995). Leadership in council-manager cities: The institutional implications. In H. G. Frederickson (Ed.), Ideal and practice in council-manager government (pp. 20-28). Washington, DC: International City/ County Management Association.
39. Renner, T., & DeSantis, V. (1998). Municipal form of government: Issues and trends. In Municipal year book 1998. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
40. Ruhil, A. (2003). Structural change and fiscal flows: A framework for analyzing the effects of urban events. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 396-416.
41. Ryan, E., & Lupher, E. (2003). An overview of local government expenditures in Michigan: Patterns and trends. In C. Ballard, P. Courant, D. Drake, R. Fisher, & E. Gerber (Eds.), Michigan at the millennium: A benchmark and analysis of its fiscal and economic structure (pp. 257-277). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
42. Strumm, T., & Corrigan, M. (1998). City managers: Do they promote fiscal efficiency? Urban Affairs Review, 20, 343-352.
43. Svara, J. (1987). Mayoral leadership in council manager cities: Preconditions versus preconceptions. Journal of Politics, 49, 207-227.
44. Svara, J. (2005). Exploring structures and institutions in city government. Public Administration Review, 65, 500-506.
45. Wheeland, C. (2002). An institutionalist perspective on mayoral leadership: Linking leadership style to formal structure. National Civic Review, 91, 25-39.
46. Wildavsky, A. (1987). Choosing preferences and constructing institutions: A cultural theory of preference formation. American Political Science Association, 81, 3-22.