E-government functionality and website features: A case study of indonesia

Journal of Global Information Technology Management

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 31-50

  Rahardjo, Edhy ^a   Mirchandani, Dinesh ^a   Joshi, Kailash ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic government; Functionality; Website features

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958532240     PISSN: 1097198X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1097198X.2007.10856437     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aldrich, D., Bertot, J. C., & Mcclure, C. R. E-govemment: Initiatives, developments, and issues. Government Information Quarterly, 19(4), 2002, 349-355.
2. Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-Step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 1988,411-423
3. Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 3(3), 2002, 114-127
4. Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. Data triangulation and web quality metrics: A case study in e- govemment. Information & Management, 43(6), 2006, 767-777
5. Becker, S., E-govemment Usability for Older Adults. Communications of the ACM 48(2), 102-104
6. Brannen, A., & Cornett C. “E-Government" in California: Providing Services to Citizens Through the Internet, January 24, 2001. Retrieved March 3, from http://www.lao.ca.gov/2001/012401_egovemment.html.
7. Bretschneider, S., Gant, J., & Ahn, M. A general model of e-govemment service adoption: Empirical exploration. In Proceedings of the Public Management Research Conference, Georgetown Public Policy Institute Washington, D.C., October 9-11, 2003. Retrieved Feb 10, from http://www.pmranet.org/conferences/georgetownpapers/Bretscheider.pdf.
8. Carter, L., & Belanger, F. The utilization of e-govemment services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 2005, 5-26
9. CDT. E-Govemment in Developing Countries. 2005. Retrieved March 10, 2006 from http://www.cdt.org/egov/descriptions.shtml.
10. Chin, W. The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In Modem Methods for Business Research, Marcoulides, G., (Ed.), 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
11. Edmiston, K. State and Local E-govemment: Prospects and Challenges. American Review of Public Administration 33(1), 2003, 20-45.
12. Guo, X. & Lu, J. Effectiveness of E-Government Online Services in Australia. Electronic Government Strategies and Implementation, 2005, 214-241.
13. Hang, W., Siau, K. & Wei, K.K. Electronic Government Strategies and Implementation. 2005, Idea Group, PA.
14. Hatcher, L. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, 1994, Cary, NC: The SAS Institute.
15. Horrigan, J. How Americans Get In Touch With Government., March 20, 2004, Retrieved March 3, 2006, from http://www.pewintemet.org/pdfs/PIP_E-Gov_Report_0504.pdf
16. Hung, S.Y., Ku, C.Y., & Chang, C.M. E-Govemment Applications and User Acceptance in Taiwan. Electronic Government Strategies and Implementation, 2005,421-440.
17. Ke, W., & Wei, K., Successful E-Govemment in Singapore, Communications of the ACM, 47(6), 2004, 95-99
18. Koh C. & Prybutok, V. The Three Ring Model and Development of an Instrument for Measuring Dimensions of E-Govemment Functions. Journal of Computer Information Systems 43(3), 2003, 34-39.
19. Luling, D., Taking it online: Anyway, Anyplace, Anytime…Tennessee Anytime. The Journal of Government Financial Management 50(2), 2001,42-46
20. Mooney, C., & Duval, R. Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series no. 07-095, 1993, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
21. Musso, J., Weare, C., & Hale, M. Designing Web Technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good Management or Good Democracy? Political Communication 17(1), 2000, 1-19.
22. Norris, D. & Moon, M. Advancing E-govemment at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? Public Administration Review 65(1), 2005, 64-75.
23. Nunnally, J. Psychometric Theory. 1978, McGraw Hill, NY.
24. PRINS, J.E.J Designing E-Government: On the Crossroads of Technological Innovation and Institutional Change. 2001, Kluwer Law International, Netherlands.
25. Schaupp, L. C., & Carter, L. E-voting: From Apathy to Adoption. Joumalof Enterprise Information Management 18(5/6), 2005, 586-601.
26. Singh, S., & Naidoo, G. Towards an E-Govemment Solution: A south African Perspective. Electronic Government Strategies and Implementation, 2005, 325-353.
27. Tan, W. & Subramaniam, R. E-govemment: Implementation Policies and Best Practices from Singapore. Electronic Government Strategies and Implementation, 2005, 305-324.
28. Trochim, W, Research Methods in Knowledge Base. 1999, Cornell Custom Publishing, NY.
29. West, D. Assessing E-Government: The Internet democracy, and service delivery by state and federal governments. Brown University Report. 2000. Retreived December 20, 2005 from http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Taubman_Center/poheports/egovtrelease00.html.
30. West, D. State and Federal E-govemment in the United States. Brown University Report. 2001. http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Taubman_Center/poheports/egovt01us.html.
31. Wixom, B., & Watson, H. An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 2001, 17-41.