Applicability of pushover analysis-based seismic performance evaluation procedure for steel arch bridges

Engineering Structures

Volumn 26, Issue 13, 2004, Pages 1957-1977

  Lu, Zhihao ^a   Ge, Hanbin ^a   Usami, Tsutomu ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Applicability; Capacity evaluation; Demand prediction; ESDOF; Higher mode effect; Pushover analysis; Seismic performance; Steel arch bridge

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ARCHES; BUCKLING; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FAILURE ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; SEISMOLOGY;

EQUIVALENT SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM (ESDOF); PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

STEEL BRIDGES;

BRIDGE; EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

BRIDGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 7744242829     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kawashima K. Unjoh S. The damage of highway bridges in the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake and its impact on Japanese seismic design J Earthquake Eng 1 3 1997 505-541
2. Usami T. editor Seismic performance evaluation procedures and upgrading measures for steel bridges, Subcommittee for Seismic Design of Steel Bridges, Task Committee of Performance-Based Seismic Design Methods for Steel Bridges 2003 Japan Society of Steel Construction (JSSC) Tokyo (Japan) in Japanese
3. Ghobarah A. Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of develop Eng Struct 23 8 2001 878-884
4. Saiidi M. Sozen M.A. Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures ASCE J Struct Div 107 5 1981 937-951
5. Fajfar P. Gašperšič P. The N2 method for seismic damage analysis of RC buildings Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 25 1 1996 31-46
6. Bracci J.M. Kunnath S.K. Reinhorn A.M. Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures ASCE J Struct Eng 123 1 1997 3-10
7. Krawinkler H. Seneviratna G.D.P.K. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation Eng Struct 20 4-6 1998 452-464
8. Usami T. Zheng Y. Ge H.B. Seismic design method for thin-walled steel frame structures ASCE J Struct Eng 127 2 2001 137-144
9. Chopra A.K. Goel R.K. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 31 3 2002 561-582
10. Chintanapakdee C. Chopra A.K. Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 32 3 2003 417-442
11. Zheng Y. Usami T. Ge H.B. Seismic response predictions of multi-span steel bridges through pushover analysis Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 32 8 2003 1259-1274
12. Seismology Committee, Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary. Sacramento, CA; 1999.
13. Applied Technology Council (ATC). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Redwood, CA; 1996.
14. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). NEHRP recommended provisions for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report No. FEMA 273, Washington, DC; 1997.
15. Japan Road Association (JRA). Specifications for highway bridges, Part V. Seismic design. Tokyo, Japan; 1996 [in Japanese].
16. Japan Road Association (JRA). Specifications for highway bridges, Part V. Seismic design. Tokyo, Japan; 2002 [in Japanese].
17. Isaković T, Fischinger M. Regularity indices for bridge structures. In: Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand; 2000. Paper No. 1725.
18. Lu ZH, Usami T, Ge HB. Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes. Part 2: Simplified verification procedure. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam, in press.
19. Zheng Y. Usami T. Ge H.B. Ductility of thin-walled steel box stub-columns ASCE J Struct Eng 126 11 2000 1304-1311
20. Zheng Y. Usami T. Ge H.B. Ductility evaluation procedure for thin-walled steel structures ASCE J Struct Eng 126 11 2000 1312-1319
21. Japan Road Association (JRA). Specifications for highway bridges, Part V. Seismic design. Tokyo, Japan; 1980 [in Japanese].
22. Usami T, Lu ZH, Ge HB, Kono T. Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes. Part 1: Dynamic analysis approach. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam, in press.
23. Kimura H, Morikawa H, Kuroiro T, Hazeyama H. Superstructure design of the Shiminasegawa Bridge. Bridge Foundation Eng 1990;November:7-14 [in Japanese].
24. ABAQUS/Standard user's manual, version 6.3. Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, R.I.; 2003.
25. Nonaka T. Ali A. Dynamic response of half-through steel arch bridge using fiber model ASCE J Bridge Eng 6 6 2001 482-488
26. Morishita K, Usami T, Kasai A. Fundamental study on seismic performance evaluation methods for civil engineering structures. NUCE Res. Rep., No. 2002-01, Department of Civil Engineering, Nagoya University, Japan; 2002 [in Japanese].
27. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of structures 2nd ed 2000 Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs (NJ)