Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes. Part 2: Simplified verification procedure

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 33, Issue 14, 2004, Pages 1355-1372

  Lu, Zhihao ^a   Usami, Tsutomu ^a   Ge, Hanbin ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Capacity; Demand; ESDOF; Pushover analyses; Seismic performance; Seismic verification procedure; Steel arch bridge

Indexed keywords

ARCH BRIDGES; CIVIL ENGINEERING; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); SEISMOLOGY; STEEL BRIDGES; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES; PUSHOVER ANALYSIS; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; STEEL ARCH BRIDGES;

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS;

BRIDGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 7744246705     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.406     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Usami T, Lu ZH, Ge HB, Kono T. Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes. Part 1: Dynamic analyses approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:1337-1354.
2. Japan Road Association (JRA). Specifications for Highway Bridges, Part V Seismic design. JRA: Tokyo, Japan, 1996.
3. Japan Road Association (JRA). Specifications for Highway Bridges, Part V Seismic design. JRA: Tokyo, Japan, 2002.
4. Bracci JM, Kunnath SK, Reinhorn AM. Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997; 123:3-10.
5. Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analyses procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:561-582.
6. Chopra AK, Goel RK, Chintanapakdee C. Statistics of single-degree-of-freedom estimate of displacement for pushover analyses of buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129:459-469.
7. Chintanapakdee C, Chopra AK. Evaluation of modal pushover analyses using generic frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32:417-442.
8. Fajfar P, Gašperšič P. The N2 method for the seismic damage analyses of RC buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25:31-46.
9. Usami T, Zheng Y, Ge HB. Seismic design method for thin-walled steel frame structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2001; 127:137-144.
10. Zheng Y, Usami T, Ge HB. Seismic response predictions of multi-span steel bridges through pushover analyses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32:1259-1274.
11. Krawinkler H, Seneviratna GDPK. Pros and cons of a pushover analyses of seismic performance evaluation. Engineering Structures 1998; 20 452-464.
12. Zheng Y, Usami T, Ge HB. Ductility of thin-walled steel box stub-columns. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2000; 126:1304-1311.
13. Zheng Y, Usami T, Ge HB. Ductility evaluation procedure for thin-walled steel structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2000; 126:1312-1319.
14. Kono T, Ge HB, Usami T. Re-examination of the ultimate strain formula for steel box stub-columns and its application in steel arch bridges. Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Ductility Design Method for Bridges Ductility Design Subcommittee, Earthquake Engineering Committee, JSCE, Tokyo, Japan, 2003; 323-328.
15. Usami T. Seismic Performance Evaluation Procedures and Upgrading Measures for Steel Bridges, Subcommittee for Seismic Design of Steel Bridges, Task Committee of Performance-Based Seismic Design Methods for Steel Bridges, Japan Society of Steel Construction, October 2003.