Seismic response predictions of muti-span steel bridges through pushover analysis

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1259-1274

  Zheng, Yi ^a   Usami, Tsutomu ^b   Ge, Hanbin ^b  

^a Yamato Engineering Inc   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bearing support; Higher modal effect; Isolation bearing; Multi span continuous bridge; Pushover analysis; Seismic design; Steel bridge

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE BEARINGS; BRIDGE PIERS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; SEISMOLOGY; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; THIN WALLED STRUCTURES;

PUSHOVER ANALYSIS;

STEEL BRIDGES;

BRIDGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STEEL STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 0037659705     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.272     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Usami T, Oda H. Numerical analysis and verification methods for seismic design of steel structures. Journal of Structural Mechanics and Earthquake Engineering (JSCE) 2001; 668/I-54:1-16.
2. Une H, Kawashima K, Shoji G. Pushover analysis of a frame bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering (JSCE) 1999; 45A:947-956.
3. Fajfar P, Gašperšič P, Drobnič D. A simplified nonlinear method for seismic damage analysis of structures. Proceedings of the Workshop on Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Rotterdam, 1997; 183-193.
4. Ballard TT, Sedarat H. SR5 Lake Washington Ship Canal Bridge pushover analysis. Computers and Structures 1999; 72:63-80.
5. Isaković T, Fischinger M. Regularity indices for bridge structures. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000, CD-ROM, 8.
6. Sadii M, Sozen MA. Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures. Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE) 1981; 107(5):937-951.
7. Fajfar P, Gašperšič P. The N2 method for seismic damage analysis of RC buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25:31-46.
8. Collins KR, Wen YK, Foutch DA. Dual-level seismic design: a reliability-based methodology. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25:1433-1467.
9. Bracci JM, Kunnath SK, Reinhorn AM. Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1997; 123(1):3-10.
10. Krawinkler H, Seneviratna GDPK. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Engineering Structures 1998; 20:452-464.
11. Usami T, Zheng Y, Ge HB. Seismic design method for thin-walled steel frame structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2001; 127(2):137-144.
12. JRA. Specifications for Highway Bridges, Part V. Japan Road Assoc.: Tokyo, 1996.
13. Chi WM, El-Tawil S, Deierlein GG, Abel JF. Inelastic analysis of a 17-story steel framed building damaged during Northridge. Engineering Structures 1998; 20(4-6):481-495.
14. Kawashima K, Oshima K, Hasegawa K, Unjoh S, Okeda K, Maehara Y. Seismic Design Examples for Road Bridges. Sankaidou: Tokyo, Japan, 1992.
15. ABAQUS/Standard User's Manual. Hibbitt, Karlson & Sorensen, Inc.: Rhode Island, 1999.
16. Shen C, Mamaghani IHP, Mizuno E, Usami T. Cyclic behavior of structural steels. II: theory. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1995; 121:1165-1172.
17. Kobayashi M, Usami T, Kasai A. Seismic performance evaluation of steel bridge piers with and without seismic isolator. Journal of Structural Mechanics and Earthquake Engineering (JSCE) 1999; 619/1-47: 177-192.
18. Fishinger, Isakovič T, Fajfar P. Seismic analysis of viaduct structure-which method to choose? Proceedings of Workshop on Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Rotterdam, 1997; 347-358.
19. UBC 1991. Uniform Building Code. International Conference of Building Officials: Whittier, CA, 1991.