Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies

Computers and Education

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1202-1211

  Waycott, Jenny ^a   Bennett, Sue ^b   Kennedy, Gregor ^a   Dalgarno, Barney ^c   Gray, Kathleen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^c CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Digital immigrants; Digital natives; Media in education; Post secondary education

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; DAILY LIVES; DIGITAL DIVIDE; DIGITAL NATIVES; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; FIRST YEAR STUDENTS; FOCUS GROUPS; HIGHER EDUCATION; HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMED DECISION; MEDIA IN EDUCATION; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION; STAFF PERCEPTIONS; SUPPORT STAFF; TEACHING AND LEARNING;

COMPUTER CRIME; TEACHING; TECHNOLOGY;

STUDENTS;

EID: 77349106664     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barnes K., Marateo R.C., and Ferris S.P. Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate 3 4 (2007)
2. Barnes C., and Tynan B. The adventures of Miranda in the brave new world: Learning in a Web 2.0 millennium. ALT-J 15 3 (2007) 189-200
3. Bennett S., and Lockyer L. Becoming an online teacher: Adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education. Educational Media International 41 3 (2004) 231-244
4. Bennett S., Maton K., and Kervin L. The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology 39 5 (2008) 775-786
5. Cairncross F. Generation Y and new media: Where next? In The impact of digitization-A generation apart (2007), KPMG International, London, United Kingdom. http://www.kpmg.com/Industries/ICE/Other/ImpactDigit.htm Accessed 25.07.07
6. Caruso J.B., and Kvavik R. ECAR study of students and information technology 2005: Convenience, connection, control, and learning (2005), EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, Boulder, Colorado
7. Coffey A., and Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies (1996), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
8. Creswell J.W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2nd ed. (2003), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
9. Ferrari, J. (2007). Go digital or lose out, teachers told. The Australian (p. 9).
10. Foley J., and Ojeda C. Teacher beliefs, best practice, technology usage in the classroom: A problematic relationship. In: McFerrin K., et al. (Ed). Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2008 (2008), AACE, Chesapeake, Virginia, USA 4110-4117
11. Head, B. (2007). The D Generation: Leading the emerging generation of digital natives calls for a light touch. AFR Boss (pp. 26-30).
12. Ipsos MORI. (2007). Student Expectations Study: Key findings from online research and discussion evenings held in June 2007 for the Joint Information Systems Committee. JISC.
13. Kennedy G., Krause K.-L., Judd T., Churchward A., and Gray K. First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Melbourne (2006), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. http://www.bmu.unimelb.edu.au/research/munatives/natives_report2006.rtf Accessed 10.04.07
14. Kennedy G., et al. The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ASCILITE Singapore 2007 (2007), ASCILITE, Singapore 517-525
15. Kennedy G., et al. Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students' use of technology. Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ASCILITE Melbourne 2008 (2008), ASCILITE, Melbourne 484-492
16. Kennedy G., et al. Educating the net generation: A handbook of findings for practice and policy (2009), Australian Learning and Teaching Council, Sydney. http://www.netgen.unimelb.edu.au/outcomes/handbook.html
17. Leech R. Teaching the digital natives. Teacher: The National Education Magazine 2006 (2006) 6-9
18. Lohnes S., and Kinzer C. Questioning assumptions about students' expectations for technology in college classrooms. Innovate 3 5 (2007). http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=431
19. Lorenzo G., Oblinger D., and Dziuban C. How choice, co-creation, and culture are changing what it means to be net savvy. Educause Quarterly 30 1 (2007)
20. Miles M.B., and Huberman A.M. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (1994), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
21. Newton R. Staff attitudes to the development and delivery of e-learning. New Library World 104 10 (2003) 412-425
22. Norris P. Digital divide: Civic engagement information poverty, and the Internet Worldwide (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York
23. Oblinger D.G., and Oblinger J.L. Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation. In: Oblinger D.G., and Oblinger J.L. (Eds). Educating the net generation (2005), EDUCAUSE, Boulder, Colaroado (pp. 2.1-2.20)
24. Oliver B., and Goerke V. Australian undergraduates' use and ownership of emerging technologies: Implications and opportunities for creating engaging learning experiences for the Net Generation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 23 2 (2007) 171-186
25. Panda S., and Mishra S. E-learning in a mega open university: Faculty attitude, barriers and motivators. Educational Media International 44 4 (2007) 323-338
26. Philip D. The knowledge building paradigm: A model of learning for Net Generation students. Innovate 3 5 (2007). http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=368
27. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9 5 (2001)
28. Prensky M. H. sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate 5 3 (2009). http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=705
29. Salaway G., Caruso J.B., and Nelson M.R. The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2007 (2007), EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, Boulder, Colorado
30. Salaway G., Caruso J.B., and Nelson M.R. The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology 2008 (2008), EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, Boulder, Colorado
31. Schoonenboom J., Roozen F., Sligte H., and Klein T. The state-of-the-art of ICT in higher education. In ICT-onderwijsmonitor studiejaar 2002/2003 (2004), Universiteit van Amsterdam, SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut/Research vooor Beleid, Amsterdam/Leiden
32. Selwyn N. The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 2 (2007) 83-94
33. Steel C. Influence of teacher beliefs on web-enhanced learning experiences: Learners and teachers. Who's learning? Whose technology?. In: Markauskaite L., Goodyear P., and Reimann P. (Eds). Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education (2006), Sydney University Press, Sydney 795-805
34. Toledo C.A. Digital culture: Immigrants and tourists responding to the natives' drumbeat. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 19 1 (2007) 84-92
35. Underwood J. Rethinking the digital divide: Impacts on student-tutor relationships. European Journal of Education 42 2 (2007) 213-222
36. Valcke M. ICT in higher education: An uncomfortable zone for institutes and their policies. In: Atkinson R., McBeath C., Jonas-Dwyer D., and Philips R. (Eds). Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE conference (2004), ASCILITE, Perth 20-35
37. Warschauer M. Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
38. Weaver D., Spratt C., and Nair C.S. Academic and student use of a learning management system: Implications for quality. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 24 1 (2008) 30-41