Functional assessment of accommodating intraocular lenses versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: Metaanalysis

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 380-388

  Takakura, Ako ^a   Iyer, Prashanth ^a   Adams, Jared R ^a   Pepin, Susan M ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATING INTRAOCULAR LENS; ACCOMMODATION; ACCOMMODATION DISORDER; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LENS CAPSULE; LENS IMPLANT; META ANALYSIS; MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOPHAKIA; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PSEUDOPHAKIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 77349086031     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.039     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom 91 (2008) 279-295
2. Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17 (2006) 12-18
3. Nishi Y., Mireskandari K., Khaw P., and Findl O. Lens refilling to restore accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg 35 (2009) 374-382
4. Findl O., and Leydolt C. Meta-analysis of accommodating intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 522-527
5. Cumming J.S., Colvard D.M., Dell S.J., Doane J., Fine I.H., Hoffman R.S., Packer M., and Slade S.G. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 812-825
6. van Tulder M., Furlan A., Bombardier C., and Bouter L. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group; the Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 28 12 (2003) 1290-1299
7. Kriechbaum K., Findl O., Koeppl C., Menapace R., and Drexler W. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 112 (2005) 453-459
8. Beiko G. Status of accommodative intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 18 (2007) 74-79
9. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Assessment of study quality. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]; Section 6. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
10. Schulz K.F., Chalmers I., Hayes R.J., and Altman D.G. Empirical evidence of bias; dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 273 (1995) 408-412
11. Wang C.-Y., Ma B., and Wang L.-L. [Clinical accommodative status study of the accommodative foldable intraocular lens]. (Chinese) Guoji Yanke Zazhi 5 (2005) 669-671
12. Xu M., Li W.S., Zhao Y.E., and Wang Q.M. [The clinical efficacy of accommodative intraocular lens and multifocal intraocular lens in pseudophakic after phacoemulsification]. (Chinese) Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 43 2 (2007) 104-107
13. Legeais J.M., Werner L., Abenhaim A., and Renard G. Pseudoaccommodation: BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (1999) 262-267
14. Mastropasqua L., Toto L., Nubile M., Falconio G., and Ballone E. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 1307-1312
15. Findl O., Kriechbaum K., Menapace R., Koeppl C., Sacu S., Wirtitsch M., Buehl W., and Drexler W. Laserinterferometric assessment of pilocarpine-induced movement of an accommodating intraocular lens; a randomized trial. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1515-1521
16. Heatley C.J., Spalton D.J., Hancox J., Kumar A., and Marshall J. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 140 (2005) 207-213
17. Sauder G., Degenring R.F., Kamppeter B., and Hugger P. Potential of the 1 CU accommodative intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol 89 (2005) 1289-1292. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1772858/pdf/bjo08901289.pdf Accessed November 16, 2009
18. Kamppeter B.A., Sauder G., and Jonas J.B. Contrast and glare sensitivity after implantation of AcrySof and Human Optics 1CU intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol 15 (2005) 458-461
19. Dogru M., Honda R., Omoto M., Toda I., Fujishima H., Arai H., Matsuyama M., Nishijima S., Hida Y., Yagi Y., and Tsubota K. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 895-902
20. Hancox J., Spalton D., Heatley C., Jayaram H., and Marshall J. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 1098-1103
21. Wolffsohn J.S., Naroo S.A., Motwani N.K., Shah S., Hunt O.A., Mantry S., Sira M., Cunliffe I.A., and Benson M.T. Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 "accommodative" intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol 90 (2006) 693-696. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1860198/pdf/693.pdf Accessed November 16, 2009
22. Marchini G., Mora P., Pedrotti E., Manzotti F., Aldigeri R., and Gandolfi S.A. Functional assessment of two different accommodative intraocular lenses compared with a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 114 (2007) 2038-2043
23. Hancox J., Spalton D., Heatley C., Jayaram H., Yip J., Boyce J., and Marshall J. Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 33 (2007) 413-417
24. Harman F.E., Maling S., Kampougeris G., Langan L., Khan I., Lee N., and Bloom P.A. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses; a randomized trial. Ophthalmology 115 (2008) 993-1001
25. Buehl W., and Findl O. Effect of intraocular lens design on posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 34 (2008) 1976-1985
26. Ursell P.G., Spalton D.J., Pande M.V., Hollick E.J., Barman S., Boyce J., and Tilling K. Relationship between intraocular lens biomaterials and posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 24 (1998) 352-360
27. Auffarth G.U., Brezin A., Caporossi A., Lafuma A., Mendicute J., Berdeaux G., and Smith A.F. Comparison of Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates following phacoemulsification with implantation of PMMA, silicone, or acrylic intra-ocular lenses in four European countries; European PCO Study Group. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 11 (2004) 319-329
28. Pepin S.M. Neuroadaptation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19 (2008) 10-12
29. Leydolt C., Neumayer T., Prinz A., and Findl O. Effect of patient motivation on near vision in pseudophakic patients. Am J Ophthalmol 147 (2009) 398-405