Functional Assessment of Two Different Accommodative Intraocular Lenses Compared with a Monofocal Intraocular Lens

Ophthalmology

Volumn 114, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 2038-2043

  Marchini, Giorgio ^a   Mora, Paolo ^b   Pedrotti, Emilio ^a   Manzotti, Francesca ^b   Aldigeri, Raffaella ^b   Gandolfi, Stefano A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR EYE SEGMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMICROSCOPY; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CILIARY BODY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENS IMPLANT; LENS IMPLANTATION; LENS LUXATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTERIOR EYE SEGMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ACOUSTIC; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REFRACTION, OCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 35548946707     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.12.034     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Dick H.B. Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16 (2005) 8-26
2. Lesiewska-Junk H., and Kaluzny J. Intraocular lens movement and accommodation in eyes of young patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 26 (2000) 562-565
3. Sen H.N., Sarikkola A.U., Uusitalo R.J., and Laatikainen L. Quality of vision after AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2483-2493
4. Langenbucher A., Huber S., Nguyen N.X., et al. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 677-685
5. Marchini G., Pedrotti E., Sartori P., and Tosi R. Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses: pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2476-2482
6. Findl O., Kiss B., Petternel V., et al. Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 669-676
7. Auffarth G.U., Martin M., Fuchs H.A., et al. Validity of anterior chamber depth measurements for the evaluation of accommodation after implantation of an accommodative Humanoptics 1CU intraocular lens [in German]. Ophthalmologe 99 (2002) 815-819
8. Urbak S.F. Ultrasound biomicroscopy. III. Accuracy and agreement of measurements. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77 (1999) 293-297
9. Marchini G., Pagliarusco A., Toscano A., et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopic and conventional ultrasonographic study of ocular dimensions in primary angle closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology 105 (1998) 2091-2098
10. Schneider H., Stachs O., Gobel K., and Guthoff R. Changes of the accommodative amplitude and the anterior chamber depth after implantation of an accommodative intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244 (2006) 322-329
11. Kotulak J.C., and Morse S.E. The effect of perceived distance on accommodation under binocular steady-state conditions. Vision Res 35 (1995) 791-795
12. Atchison D.A. Accommodation and presbyopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 15 (1995) 255-272
13. Heatley C.J., Spalton D.J., Hancox J., et al. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 140 (2005) 207-213
14. Koeppl C., Findl O., Menapace R., et al. Pilocarpine-induced shift of an accommodating intraocular lens: AT-45 Crystalens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1290-1297
15. Dell S.J. Pilocarpine-induced shift of an accommodating IOL. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1469-1472