Meta-analysis of accommodating intraocular lenses

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 522-527

  Findl, Oliver ^a   Leydolt, Christina ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PILOCARPINE;

ACCOMMODATION; ARTICLE; CATARACT EXTRACTION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MEASUREMENT; OPTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33847140087     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.11.020     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Leyland M, Pringle E. Multifocal vs monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006; (4). Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab003169.html. Accessed December 9, 2006
2. Nishi O., Hara T., Sakka Y., et al. Refilling the lens with inflatable endocapsular balloon. Dev Ophthalmol 22 (1991) 122-125
3. Parel J.-M., Gelender H., Trefers W.F., and Norton E.W.D. Phaco-ersatz: cataract surgery designed to preserve accommodation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 224 (1986) 165-173
4. Schachar R.A. Cause and treatment of presbyopia with a method for increasing the amplitude of accommodation. Ann Ophthalmol 24 (1992) 445-447 452
5. Mathews S. Scleral expansion surgery does not restore accommodation in human presbyopia. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 873-877
6. Vinciguerra P., Nizzola G.M., Bailo G., et al. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for presbyopia: 24-month follow-up in three eyes. J Refract Surg 14 (1998) 31-37
7. Bauerberg J.M. Centered vs inferior off-center ablation to correct hyperopia and presbyopia. J Refract Surg 15 (1999) 66-69
8. Strenk S.A., Semmlow J.L., Strenk L.M., et al. Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40 (1999) 1162-1169
9. Helmholtz H. Ueber die Accommodation des Auges. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1 2 (1855) 1-74
10. Coleman D.J. On the hydraulic suspension theory of accommodation. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 84 (1986) 846-868
11. Holladay J.T. Refractive power calculations for intraocular lenses in the phakic eye. Am J Ophthalmol 116 (1993) 63-66
12. Nakazawa M., and Ohtsuki K. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses: optical analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25 (1984) 1458-1460
13. Ravalico G., and Baccara F. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 68 (1990) 604-606
14. Huber C. Planned myopic astigmatism as a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia. Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J 7 (1981) 244-249
15. Verzella F., and Calossi A. Multifocal effects of against-the-rule myopic astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes. Refract Corneal Surg 9 (1993) 58-61
16. Yamamoto S., and Adachi-Usami E. Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes as measured with visually evoked potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33 (1992) 443-446
17. Fukuyama M., Oshika T., Amano S., and Yoshitomi F. Relationship between apparent accomodation and corneal multifocality in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 1178-1181
18. Oshika T., Mimura T., Tanaka S., et al. Apparent accommodation and corneal wavefront aberration in pseudophakic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 (2002) 2882-2886
19. Küchle M., Langenbucher A., Gusek-Schneider G.C., et al. Erste Ergebnisse der Implantation einer neuen, potenziell akkommodierbaren Hinterkammerlinse-eine prospektive Sicherheitsstudie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 218 (2001) 603-608
20. Küchle M., Nguyen N.X., Langenbucher A., et al. Zwei Jahre Erfahrung mit der akkommodativen Hinterkammerlinse 1 CU. Ophthalmologe 99 (2002) 820-824
21. Claoué C. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation; prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2088-2091
22. Macsai M.S., Padnick-Silver L., and Fontes B.M. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 628-633
23. Sauder G., Degenring R.F., Kamppeter B., and Hugger P. Potential of the 1 CU accommodative intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol 89 (2005) 1289-1292
24. Findl O., Kriechbaum K., Menapace R., et al. Laserinterferometric assessment of pilocarpine-induced movement of an accommodating intraocular lens; a randomized trial. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1515-1521
25. Mastropasqua L., Toto L., Nubile M., et al. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 1307-1312
26. Heatley C.J., Spalton D.J., Hancox J., et al. Fellow eye comparison between the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens and the Acrysof MA30 monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 140 (2005) 207-213
27. Hancox J., Spalton D., Heatley C., et al. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 1098-1103
28. Langenbucher A., Huber S., Nguyen N.X., et al. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 677-685
29. Schneider H., Stachs O., Göbel K., and Guthoff R. Changes of the accommodative amplitude and the anterior chamber depth after implantation of an accommodative intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244 (2006) 322-329
30. Langenbucher A., Seitz B., Huber S., et al. Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol 121 (2003) 1722-1727
31. Küchle M., Nguyen N.X., Langenbucher A., et al. Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 18 (2002) 208-216
32. Stachs O., Schneider H., Stave J., and Guthoff R. Potentially accommodating intraocular lenses-an in vitro and in vivo study using three-dimensional high-frequency ultrasound. J Refract Surg 21 (2005) 37-45
33. Auffarth G.U., Martin M., Fuchs H.A., et al. Validität der Vorderkammertiefenmessung zur Akkommodations-evaluierung nach Implantation einer akkommodativen Intraokularlinse (Modell Humanoptics 1CU). Ophthalmologe 99 (2002) 815-819
34. Dogru M., Honda R., Omoto M., et al. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 895-902
35. Vargas L.G., Auffarth G.U., Becker K.A., et al. Performance of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens in relation to capsulorhexis size. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 363-368
36. Buratto L., and Di Meglio G. Accommodative intraocular lenses: short-term visual results of two different lens types. Eur J Ophthalmol 16 (2006) 33-39
37. Küchle M., Seitz B., Langenbucher A., et al. Stability of refraction, accommodation, and lens position after implantation of the 1CU accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 2324-2329
38. Küchle M., Seitz B., Langenbucher A., et al. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses; the Erlangen Accommodative Intraocular Lens Study Group. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 318-324
39. Legeais J.-M., Werner L., Werner L., et al. Pseudoaccommodation: BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (1999) 262-267
40. Findl O., Kiss B., Petternel V., et al. Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 669-676
41. Koeppl C., Findl O., Menapace R., et al. Pilocarpine-induced shift of an accommodating intraocular lens: AT-45 Crystalens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 1290-1297
42. Alió J.L., Tavolato M., De la Hoz F., et al. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses; comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2494-2503
43. Cumming J.S., Slade S.G., and Chayet A. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens: results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial; the AT-45 Study Group. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 2005-2009 discussion by TP Werblin, 2010
44. Marchini G., Pedrotti E., Sartori P., and Tosi R. Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses: pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 2476-2482
45. Stachs O., Schneider H., Beck R., and Guthoff R. Pharmacological-induced haptic changes and the accommodative performance in patients with the AT-45 accommodative IOL. J Refract Surg 22 (2006) 145-150
46. Cumming J.S., Colvard D.M., Dell S.J., et al. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 812-825