Contrast and glare sensitivity after implantation of AcrySof® and Human Optics 1CU® intraocular lenses

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 458-461

  Kamppeter, B A ^a,b   Sauder, G ^a   Jonas, J B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

1CU; AcrySof; Contrast sensitivity; Glare sensitivity; Intraocular lens

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLARE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LENS IMPLANT; MALE; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; LENS IMPLANTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMATERIAL;

ACRYLIC RESINS; AGED; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; GLARE; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 23844518701     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067210501500406     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Olson RJ, Mamalis N, Werner L, Apple DJ. Cataract treatment in the beginning of the 21st century. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136: 146-54.
2. Leyland MD, Langan L, Goolfee F, et al. Prospective randomised double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses. Eye 2002; 16: 481-90.
3. Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Luke C, Jacobi FK. Multifocal intraocular lens implantation in prepresbyopic patients with unilateral cataract. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 680-6.
4. Kuchle M, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, et al. Two years experience with the new accommodative 1 CU intraocular lens. Ophthalmologe 2002; 99: 820-4.
5. Kuchle M, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, et al. Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2002; 18: 208-16.
6. Auffarth GU, Martin M, Fuchs HA, et al. Validity of anterior chamber depth measurements for the evaluation of accommodation after implantation of an accommodative Humanoptics 1CU intraocular lens. Ophthalmologe 2002; 99: 815-9.
7. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Nubile M, et al. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1307-12.
8. Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 1789-98.
9. Montes-Mico R, Espana E, Bueno I, et al. Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses: mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 85-96.
10. Doane JF. Accommodating intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004; 15: 16-21.
11. Kuchle M, Seitz B, Langenbucher A, et al. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 318-24.
12. McGwin G Jr, Scilley K, Brown J, Owsley C. Impact of cataract surgery on self-reported visual difficulties: comparison with a no-surgery reference group. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 941-8.
13. Kora Y, Marumori M, Kizaki H, et al. Experimental study of small intraocular lenses using an eye model. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19: 772-5.
14. Superstein R, Boyaner D, Overbury O, Collin C. Glare disability and contrast sensitivity before and after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23: 248-53.
15. Erie JC, Bandhauer MH. Intraocular lens surfaces and their relationship to postoperative glare. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 336-41.
16. Kershner RM. Retinal image contrast and functional visual performance with aspheric, silicone, and acrylic intraocular lenses. Prospective evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1684-94.