In touch with your feelings: Power increases reliance on bodily information

Social Cognition

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 110-121

  Guinote, Ana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77249132659     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.110     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.
2. Bargh, J. A., & Raymond, P. (1995). The naïve misuse of power: Nonconscious sources of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 26, 168-185.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Science, 22, 577-660.
4. Baumeister, R.F., Blatslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D.M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265.
5. Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173-187.
6. Clore, G. L. (1992). Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the construction of judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgment (pp. 133-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Eysenck, M. N., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336-353.
8. Fiske, S., & Berdahl, J. L. (2007). Social power. E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 678-692). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
10. Fiske, S. T., & Dépret, E. (1996). Control interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 31-61). New York: Wiley.
11. French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12. Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
13. Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From Power to Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 3, 453-466.
14. Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Guinote, A. (2004). Group size, outcome dependency, and power: Effects on perceived and actual group variability. In V. Yzerbyt, C. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 221-236). New York: Psychology Press.
17. Guinote, A. (2007a). Behavior variability and the situated focus theory of power. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 256-295). New York: Wiley.
18. Guinote, A. (2007b). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 685-697.
19. Guinote, A. (2007c). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076-1087.
20. Guinote, A. (2007d). Power and the suppression of unwanted thoughts: Does control over others decrease control over the self? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 433-440.
21. Guinote, A. (2008). Power and affordances: When the situation has more power over powerful than over powerless individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 237-252.
22. Guinote, A. (in press). The situated focus theory of power. In A. Guinote & T. Vescio (Eds.), The social psychology of power. New York: Guilford Press.
23. Guinote, A., Brown, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Minority status decreases sense of control and increases interpretive processing. Social Cognition, 24, 170-187.
24. Guinote, A., Judd, C. M., & Brauer, M. (2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 708-721.
25. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206.
26. Hecht, D. B., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Licence or obligation to smile: The effect of power and sex on amount and type of smiling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1332-1342.
27. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
28. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
29. Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (pp. 99-171). New York: Academic Press.
30. Kuhl, J. (1992). A theory of self-regulation: Action versus state orientation, self-discrimination, and some applications. Applied Psychology: An international review, 41, 97-129.
31. Lewin, K. (1941). Regression, retrogression and development. University of Iowa Studies of Child Welfare, 18, 1-43.
32. Locke, G. H. (1690). An essay concerning human understanding. Philadelphia: Zell, n.d.
33. Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L., Winkielman, P., Karuth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184-211.
34. Nisbett, R. E., & Kanouse, D. E. (1968, August-September). Obesity, hunger, and supermarket shopping behavior. Paper presented at the 76th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
35. Nordgren, L. F., van der Pligt, J., & van Harreveld, F. (2007). Evaluating Eve: Visceral states influence the evaluation of impulsive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 75-84.
36. Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 549-565.
37. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
38. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenological experiences. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433-465). New York: Guilford.
39. Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662-673.
40. Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53-117.
41. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
42. Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Social projection of transient drive states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1159-1168.
43. Van Dijke, M., & Poppe, M. (2006). Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 537-556.
44. Vescio, T. K., Snyder, M., & Butz, D. A. (2003). Power in stereotypically masculine domains: A social influence strategy X stereotype match model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1062-1078.
45. Weick, M., & Guinote, A. (2008). When subjective experiences matter: Power increases reliance on ease-of-retrieval. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 956-970.