The phylogeny of Mallotus s.str. (Euphorbiaceae) inferred from DNA sequence and morphological data

Taxon

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 101-116

  Sierra, Soraya E C ^a   Kulju, Kristo K M ^a   Fišer, Živa ^a   Aparicio, Marcela ^a   van Welzen, Peter C ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

DNA sequence data; Euphorbiaceae; Leaf anatomy; Mallotus; Morphology; Quantitative characters

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; DICOTYLEDON; DNA; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; PALEOTROPICAL KINGDOM; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; TAXONOMY;

EUPHORBIA; EUPHORBIACEAE; MALLOTUS (PLANT);

EID: 77149175653     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.591011     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Airy Shaw, H.K. 1963. Notes on Malaysian and other Asiatic Euphorbiaceae. Kew Bull. 16: 341-372.
2. Airy Shaw, H.K. 1968. Malesian and other Asiatic Euphorbiaceae. Kew Bull. 21: 379-400.
3. Airy Shaw, H.K. 1972. The Euphorbiaceae of Siam. Kew Bull. 26: 292-308.
4. Airy Shaw, H.K. 1975. The Euphorbiaceae of Borneo. Kew Bull., Addit. Ser. 4: 160-174.
5. Alfaro, M. E., Zoller, S. & Lutzoni, F. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molec. Biol. Evol. 20: 255-266.
6. Bollendorff, S.M., van Welzen, P.C. & Slik, J.W.F. 2000. A taxonomic revision of Mallotus section Polyadenii (Euphorbiaceae). Blumea 45: 319-340.
7. Brummitt, R.K. 1997. Taxonomy versus cladonomy, a fundamental controversy in biological systematics. Taxon 46: 723-734.
8. Crowe, T. 1994. Morphometrics, phylogenetic models and cladistics: Means to an end or much to do about nothing? Cladistics 10: 77-84.
9. Douady, C.J., Delsuc, F., Boucher, Y., Doolittle, W.F. & Douzery, E.J.P. 2003. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Molec. Biol. Evol. 20: 248-254.
10. Eichhorn, K. 2006. Plant diversity after rain-forest fires in Borneo. Blumea, Suppl. 18: 1-140.
11. Figge, R.M., Schubert, M., Brinkmann, H. & Cerff, R. 1999. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene diversity in Eubacteria and Eukaryotes: Evidence for intra- and inter-kingdom gene transfer. Molec. Biol. Evol. 16: 429-440.
12. Forster, P.I. 1999. A taxonomic revision of Mallotus Lour. (Euphorbiaceae) in Australia. Austrobaileya 5: 457-497.
13. Goloboff, P.A. 1999. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: Solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 15: 415-428.
14. Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Oxelman, B., Ramírez, M. J. & Szumik, C.A. 2003a. Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics 19: 324-332.
15. Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S. & Nixon, K.C. 2003b. TNT: Tree analysis using New Technology, version 1.1. http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny/tnt.
16. Goloboff, P.A., Mattoni, C.I. & Quinteros, A.S. 2006. Continuous characters analyzed as such. Cladistics 22: 589-601.
17. Goloboff, P.A. & Pol, D. 2005. Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetics. Pp. 145-159 in: Albert, V.A. (ed.), Parsimony, phylogeny and genomics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
19. Keßler, P.J.A. 2000. Secondary forest trees of Kalimantan, Indonesia: A manual to 300 selected species. Balikpapan: MOFEC-Tropenbos-Kalimantan Project.
20. Kitamura, S., Suzuki, S., Yomoto, T., Chuailua, P., Plongmai, K., Poonswad, P., Noma, N., Maruhashi, T. & Suckasam, C. 2005. A botanical inventory of a tropical seasonal forest in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand: Implications for fruit-frugivore interactions. Biodiv. Cons. 14: 1241-1262.
21. Kulju, K.K.M., Sierra, S.E.C., Draisma, S.G.A., Samuel, R. & van Welzen, P.C. 2007b. Molecular phylogeny of Macaranga, Mallotus, and related genera (Euphorbiaceae s.s.): insights from plastid and nuclear DNA sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 94: 1726-1743.
22. Kulju, K.K.M., Sierra, S.E.C. & van Welzen, P.C. 2007a. Reshaping Mallotus [part 2]: Inclusion of Neotrewia, Octospermum and Trewia in Mallotus s.str. (Euphorbiaceae s.str.). Blumea 52: 115-136.
23. Lehtonen, S. 2006. Phylogenetics of Echinodorus (Alismataceae) based on morphological data. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 150: 291-305.
24. Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P. 2001. MacClade 4: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 4.08. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
25. McPherson, G. 1995. On Mallotus and Deuteromallotus (Euphorbiaceae) in Madagascar. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., B, Adansonia 17: 169-173.
26. Meijer, W. 1967. Family Euphorbiaceae. Bot. News Bull. Forest Dept., Sabah 7: 50-53.
27. Müller, J. 1865. Euphorbiaceae. Linnaea 34: 184-197.
28. Müller, J. 1866. Euphorbiaceae tribus Acalypheae. Pp. 956-1015 in: de Candolle, A. (ed.), Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 15, 2. Paris: Masson & Fili.
29. Müller, K. 2005. SeqState: primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA datasets. Applied Bioinformatics 4: 65-69.
30. Müller, K. 2006. Incorporating information from length-mutational events into phylogenetic analysis. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 38: 667-676.
31. Nixon, K.C. 1999. The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407-414.
32. Nylander, J.A.A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Center, Uppsala University.
33. Olsen, K.M. & Schaal, B.A. 1999. Evidence on the origin of cassava: Phylogeography of Manihot esculenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 5586-5591.
34. Pax, F. & Hoffmann, K. 1914. Euphorbiaceae-Acalypheae-Mercurialinae. Pp. 145-212, 394-397 in: Engler, A. (ed.), Das Pflanzenreich, Heft 63. Leipzig: Engelmann.
35. Pickett, K.M. & Randle, C.P. 2005. Strange bayes indeed: Uniform topological priors imply non-uniform clade priors. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 34: 203-211.
36. Pimentel, R. & Riggins, R. 1987. The nature of cladistic data. Cladistics 3: 201-209.
37. Radcliffe-Smith, A. 2001. Genera Euphorbiacearum. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
38. Rae, T.C. 1998. The logical basis for the use of continuous characters in phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 14: 221-228.
39. Rannala, B. & Yang, Z.H. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Molec. Evol. 43: 304-311.
40. Raubeson, L.A. & Jansen, R.K. 2005. Chloroplast genomes of plants. Pp. 44-68 in: Henry, R.J. (ed.), Diversity and evolution of plants: Genotypic and phenotypic variation in higher plants. Wallingford: CABI.
41. Reichenbach, H.G. & Zollinger, H. 1856. Over soorten van Rottlera. Acta Soc. Regiae Sci. Indo-Neerl. 1: 1-32.
42. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
43. Samuel, R., Kathriarachchi, H., Hoffmann, P., Barfuss, M. H.J., Wurdack, K.J., Davis, C.C. & Chase, M. W. 2005. Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthaceae: Evidence from plastid matK and nuclear PHYC sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 132-141.
44. Sato, S. & Sakai, A. 2005. Birds as dispersers of Mallotus japonicus in a coniferous plantation. Jap. J. Ornithol. 54: 23-28.
45. Sierra, S.E.C., Aparicio, M., Gebraad, M. J.H., Kulju, K.K.M. & van Welzen, P.C. 2007a. The morphological range in Mallotus and a taxonomic revision of its section Rottleropsis (including Axenfeldia) in Malesia, Thailand and Africa. Blumea 52: 21-113.
46. Sierra, S.E.C., Aparicio, M., Kulju, K.K.M., Fišer, Ž., van Welzen, P.C. & van der Ham, R.W.J.M. 2006. Re-shaping Mallotus [part 1]: Expanded circumscription and revision of the genus Cordemoya (Euphorbiaceae) Blumea 51: 519-540.
47. Sierra, S.E.C., Kulju, K.K.M., Veldkamp, J.F. & van Welzen, P.C. 2007b. Resurrection of Hancea and lectotypification of Adisca (Euphorbiaceae). Blumea 52: 361-366.
48. Sierra, S.E.C. & van Welzen, P.C. 2005. A taxonomic revision of Mallotus section Mallotus (Euphorbiaceae) in Malesia. Blumea 50: 249-274.
49. Sierra, S.E.C. & van Welzen, P.C. 2006. Mallotus kongkandae (Euphorbiaceae): New record for China. Blumea 51: 365-366.
50. Sierra, S.E.C., van Welzen, P.C. & Slik, J.W.F. 2005. A taxonomic revision of Mallotus section Philippinenses (former section Rottlera-Euphorbiaceae) in Malesia and Thailand. Blumea 50: 221-248.
51. Simmons, M. P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381.
52. Simmons, M. P., Pickett, K.M. & Miya, M. 2004. How meaningful are Bayesian support values? Molec. Biol. Evol. 21: 188-199.
53. Slik, J.W.F., Keßler, P.J.A. & van Welzen, P.C. 2003a. Macaranga and Mallotus species (Euphorbiaceae) as indicators for disturbance in the mixed lowland dipterocarp forest of East Kalimantan (Indonesia). Ecol. Indicators 2: 311-324.
54. Slik, J.W.F., Poulsen, A.D., Ashton, P.S., Cannon, C.H., Eichhorn, K.A.O., Kartawinata, K., Lanniari, I., Nagamasu, H., Nakagawa, M., van Nieuwstadt, M. G.L., Payne, J., Purwaningsih, Saridan A., Sidiyasa, K., Verburg, R.W., Webb, C.O. & Wilkie, P. 2003b. A floristic analysis of the lowland dipterocarp forests of Borneo. J. Biogeogr. 30: 1517-1531.
55. Slik, J.W.F. & van Welzen, P.C. 2001a. A phylogeny of Mallotus (Euphorbiaceae) based on morphology: Indications for a pioneer origin of Macaranga. Syst. Bot. 26: 786-796.
56. Slik, J.W.F. & van Welzen, P.C. 2001b. A taxonomic revision of Mallotus sections Hancea and Stylanthus (Euphorbiaceae). Blumea 46: 3-66.
57. Smith, J.J. 1910. Bijdrage 12 tot de kennis der boomsoorten op Java. Euphorbiaceae. Meded. Dept. Landb. Ned.-Indië: 9-637.
58. Soltis, D.E. & Soltis, P.S. 1998. Choosing an approach and an appropriate gene for phylogenetic analysis. Pp. 1-42 in: Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S. & Doyle, J.J. (eds.), Molecular systematics of plants II. DNA sequencing. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
59. Sosef, M.S.M. 1997. Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa. Taxon 46: 75-85.
60. Stevens, P.F. 1991. Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: A review. Syst. Bot. 16: 533-583.
61. Strand, A.E., Leebens-Mack, J. & Milligan, B.G. 1997. Nuclear DNA-based markers for plant evolutionary biology. Molec. Ecol. 6: 113-118.
62. Suzuki, Y., Glazko, G.V. & Nei, M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 16138-16143.
63. Thiele, K. 1993. The holy grail of the perfect character: The cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 9: 275-304.
64. Van Welzen, P.C. & Sierra, S.E.C. 2006. The Mallotus wrayi complex (Euphorbiaceae). Blumea 51: 373-388.
65. Van Welzen, P.C., van der Ham, R.W.J.M. & Kulju, K.K.M. 2004. Mallotus glomerulatus (Euphorbiaceae), a new species: Its description, pollen, and phylogenetic position. Thai Forest Bull. 32: 173-178.
66. Van Welzen, P.C., Sierra, S.E.C., Gebraad, M.J.H. & Kulju, K.K.M. 2006. The distinction of five Mallotus species formerly in section Hancea (Euphorbiaceae). Blumea 51: 367-372.
67. Van Welzen, P.C., Sierra, S.E.C., Slik, J.W.F. & Bollendorff, S.M. 2007. Mallotus. Pp. 384-437 in: van Welzen, P.C. & Chayamarit, K. (eds.), Flora of Thailand, vol. 8, part 2. Bangkok: The Forest Herbarium.
68. Webster, G.L. 1994. Synopsis of the genera and suprageneric taxa of Euphorbiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 33-144.
69. Whitmore, T.C. 1973. Tree Flora of Malaya, vol. 2. London: Longman.
70. Wiens, J.J. 2001. Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: Problems and solutions. Syst. Biol. 50: 688-699.
71. Wiens, J.J. 2003. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52: 528-538.
72. Wolfe, K.H., Li, W.H. & Sharp, P.M. 1987. Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84: 9054-9058.
73. Wolfe, K.H., Sharp, P.M. & Li, W.H. 1989. Rates of synonymous substitution in plant nuclear genes. J. Molec. Evol. 29: 208-211.
74. Wurdack, K.J., Hoffmann, P. & Chase, M. W. 2005. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of uniovulate Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using plastid rbcL and trnL-F DNA sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 1397-1420.