Phylogenetic analyses of the banana family (Musaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal (ITS) and chloroplast (trnL-F) evidence

Taxon

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 20-28

  Liu, Ai Zhong ^a,b   Kress, W John ^a,c   Li, De Zhu ^b  

^a CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^b KUNMING INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeography; ITS; Molecular phylogeny; Musaceae; trnL F

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; CHLOROPLAST; CHROMOSOME; DISJUNCT DISTRIBUTION; DIVERGENCE; DNA; FRUIT; MONOCOTYLEDON; PHYLOGENETICS; TAXONOMY;

ENSETE; ENSETE VENTRICOSUM; HELICONIACEAE; LOWIACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MUSA; MUSACEAE; MUSELLA; STRELITZIACEAE; ZINGIBERALES;

EID: 77149138008     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.591003     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Argent, G.G.G. 1976. The wild bananas of Papua New Guinea. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 35: 77-114.
2. Baker, J.G. 1893. Genera and species of Museae. Ann. Bot. 7: 189-229.
3. Bremer, K. 1992. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
4. Brummit, R.K. 1992. Vascular plant families and genera. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
5. Catalan, P., Torrecilla, P., Rodriguez, J., Lopez, A. & Olmstead, R.G. 2004. Phylogeny of the festucoid grasses of subtribe Loliinae and allies (Poeae, Pooideae) inferred from ITS and trnL-F sequence. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 31: 517-541.
6. Cheesman, E.E. 1947. The classification of the bananas. Kew Bull. 2: 97-117.
7. Chen, S., Guan, K., Zhou, Z., Olmstead, R. & Cronk, Q. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of Incarvillea (Bignoniaceae) based on ITS and trnL-F sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 625-633.
8. Crisp, M.D. & Cook, L.G. 2003. Molecular evidence for definition of genera in the Oxylobium group (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae). Syst. Bot. 28: 705-713.
9. Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
10. Dahlgren, R., Clifford, H.T. & Yeo, P. 1982. The monocotyledons: A comparative study. London: Academic Press.
11. De Queiroz, A., Donoghue, M.J. & Kim, J. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 657-681.
12. Doyle, J.J. & Dolye, J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf material. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11-15.
13. Endress, P.K. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
14. Petersen, O.G. 1889. Musaceae, Zingiberaceae, Cannaceae, Marantaceae. Pp. 1-43 in: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 2. Leipzig: Engelmann.
15. Eriksson, T. 1998. AutoDecay, version 4.0. Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm: published and distributed by the author. http://www.bergianska.se/index_kon-taktaoss_torsten.html.
16. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A.G. & Bult, C. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
17. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence intervals on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
18. Fernandez, I.A., Aguilar, J.F., Panero, J.L. & Feliner, G.N. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of Doronicum (Asteraceae, Senecioneae) based on morphological, nuclear ribosomal (ITS), and chloroplast (trnL-F) evidence. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 20: 41-64.
19. Franchet, M.A. 1889. Un nouveau type de Musa lasiocarpa. J. Bot (Morot) 3: 329-331.
20. Gawel, N.J. & Jarret, R.L. 1991. Chloroplast DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) in Musa species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81: 783-786.
21. Gawel, N.J., Jarret, R.L. & Whittemore, A.P. 1992. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)-based phylogenetic analysis of Musa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 286-290.
22. Gene Codes Corporation. 2006. Sequencher, version 4.2. Ann Arbor: Gene Codes Corporation. http://www.genecodes.com/.
23. Geri, C. & Ng, F.S.P. 2005. Musa lokok (Musaceae), a new species of banana from Bario Borneo. Gard. Bull. Singapore 57: 279-283.
24. Gonzalez, D., Vovides, A.P. & Barcenas, C. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships of the neotropical genus Dioon (Cycadales, Zamiaceae) based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence data. Syst. Bot. 33: 229-236.
25. Häkkinen, M. 2005. Musa azizii, a new Musa species (Musaceae) from northern Borneo. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 56: 27-31.
26. Häkkinen, M. 2006. Musa barioensis, a new Musa species (Musaceae) from northern Borneo. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 57: 55-60.
27. Häkkinen, M. & Väre, H. 2008. Typification and check-list of Musa L. names (Musaceae) with nomenclatural notes. Adansonia, sér. 3, 30 (1): 63-112.
28. Häkkinen, M. & Wang, H. 2008. Musa zaifui sp nov (Musaceae) from Yunnan, China. Nord. J. Bot. 26: 42-46.
29. Hulsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F.R. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
30. Hutchinson, J. 1964. The genera of flowering plants. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
31. Isobe, M. & Hashimoto, K. 1994. The chromosome count of nine taxa in Musa and its allied genus Musella. Bull. Hiroshima Bot. Gard. 15: 7-11.
32. Itino, T., Kato, M. & Hotta, M. 1991. Pollination ecology of the two wild bananas, Musa acuminata subsp. halabanensis and M. salaccensis: Chiropterophily and ornithophily. Biotropica 23: 151-158.
33. Jain, R.K. 1963. Studies in Musaceae-I. Musa cardiosperma sp. nov., a fossil banana fruit from the Deccan Intertrappean Series, India. Palaeobotanist 12: 45-54.
34. Jain, R.K. 1965. Studies in Musaceae-III. Fossil records of Musaceae and the origin of bananas. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 6: 170-179.
35. Janis, C.M. 1993. Tertiary mammal evolution in the context of changing climates, vegetation, and tectonic events. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 467-500.
36. Jarret, R.L., Gawel, N., Whittemore, A. & Sharrock, S. 1992. RFLP-based phylogeny of Musa species in Papua New Guinea. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 579-584.
37. Kao, M.T. & Lai, M.J. 1978. Musaceae. Pp. 828-829 in: Li, H.L. (ed.), Flora of Taiwan, vol. 5. Taibai: The National Science Council of the Republic of China.
38. Karol, K.G., Suh, Y., Schatz, G.E. & Zimmer, E.A. 2000. Molecular evidence for the phylogenetic position of Takhtajania in the Winteraceae: Inference from nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast gene spacer sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 87: 414-432.
39. Kong, H.-Z., Chen, Z.-D. & Lu, A.-M. 2002. Phylogeny of Chloranthus (Chloranthaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal ITS and plastid trnL-F sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 940-946.
40. Kress, W.J. 1990. The phylogeny and classification of the Zingiberales. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 77: 698-721.
41. Kress, W.J. 1995. Phylogeny of the Zingiberanae: Morphology and molecules. Pp. 443-460 in: Rudall, P., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F. & Humphries, C.J. (eds.), Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
42. Kress, W.J., Liu, A.-Z., Newman, M. & Li, Q.-J. 2005. The molecular phylogeny of Alpinia (Zingibraceae): A complex and polyphyletic genus of gingers. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 167-178.
43. Kress, W.J., Prince, L.M., Hahn, W.J. & Zimmer, E.A. 2001. Unraveling the evolution of the families of the Zingiberales using morphological and molecular evidence. Syst. Biol. 50: 926-944.
44. Kress, W.J., Prince, L.M. & Williams, K.J. 2002. The phylogeny and a new classification of the gingers (Zingiberaceae): Evidence from molecular data. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1682-1696.
45. Kress, W.J. & Specht, C.D. 2005. Between Cancer and Capricorn: Phylogeny, evolution, and ecology of the tropical Zingiberales. Pp. 459-478 in: Friis, I. & Balslev, H. (eds.), Plant diversity and complexity patterns: Local, regional and global dimensions. Biologiske Skrifter 55. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.
46. Kubitzki, K. 1998. The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 4, Flowering plants; Monocotyledons; Alismatanae and Commelinanae (except Gramineae). Berlin: Springer.
47. Lane, I.E. 1955. Genera and genetic relationships in Musaceae. Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. Munchen. 13: 114-131.
48. Li, H.W. 1978. The Musaceae of Yunnan. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 16: 54-64.
49. Li, H.W. 1979. Musaceae. Pp. 725-733 in: Wu, C.Y. (ed.), Flora Yunnanica, vol. 2. Beijing: Sciene Press.
50. Li, H.W. 1981. Musaceae. Pp. 2-14 in: Wu, D.L. (ed.), Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 16. Beijing: Science Press.
51. Liu, A.-Z. 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of Musaceae. Dissertation, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
52. Liu, A.-Z., Kress, W.J. & Long, C.-L. 2003. Customary use and conservational attention to Musella lasiocarpa (Musaceae), an endemic plant to China. Econ. Bot. 57: 279-281.
53. Liu, A.-Z., Kress, W.J., Wang, H. & Li, D.-Z. 2002a. Insect pollination of Musella lasiocarpa (Musaceae), a monotypic genus endemic to Yunnan, China. Pl. Syst. Evol. 235: 135-146.
54. Liu, A.-Z., Li, D.-Z. & Li, X.-W. 2002b. Taxonomic notes on wild bananas (Musa) from China. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 43: 77-81.
55. Liu, A.-Z., Li, D.-Z., Wang, H. & Kress, W.J. 2002c. Ornithopilous and chiropterophilous pollination in Musa itinerans (Musaceae), a pioneer species in tropical rain forests in Yunnan, SW China. Biotropica: 34: 254-260.
56. Mabberley, D.J. 1997. The plant-book: A portable dictionary of the plants. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
57. Maddison, D.R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 40: 315-328.
58. Manchester, S.R. & Kress, W.J. 1993. Fossil bananas (Musaceae): Ensete oregonense sp. nov. from the Eocene of western North America and its phytogeographic significance. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 1264-1272.
59. Molvray, M., Kores, P.J. & Chase, M.W. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships within Korthalsella (Viscaeae) based on nuclear ITS and plastid trnL-F sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 249-260.
60. Mort, M.E., Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E. & Marbry, M.L. 2000. Comparison of three methods for estimating internal support for phylogenetic trees. Syst. Bot. 49: 160-170.
61. Nakai, T. 1941. Notulae ad plantas Asiae Orientalis (XVI). J. Jap. Bot. 17: 189-203.
62. Nixon, K.C. & Carpenter, J.M. 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12: 221-241.
63. Novacek, M.J. 1999. 100 million years of land vertebrate evolution: The Cretaceous-Early Tertiary transition. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 230-258.
64. Nur, N. 1976. Studies on pollination in Musaceae. Ann. Bot. 40: 167-177.
65. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
66. Rambaut, A. 1996. Se-Al: Sequence alignment editor, version 2.0. http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk.
67. Richardson, J.E., Pennington, R.T., Pennington, T.D. & Hollingsworth, P.M. 2001. Rapid diversification of a species-rich genus of neotropical rain forest trees. Science 293: 2242-2245.
68. Rudall, P.J., Stevenson, D.W. & Linder, H.P. 1999. Structure and systematics of Hanguana, a monocotyledon of uncertain affinity. Austral. Syst. Bot. 12: 311-330.
69. Sagot, P. 1887. Sur le genre bananier. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 34: 328-330.
70. Shepherd, K. 1990. Observations on Musa taxonomy. Pp. 158-165 in: Jarret, R.L. (ed.), Identification of genetic diversity in the genus Musa. Montpellier: INIBAP.
71. Simmonds, N.W. 1960. Notes on banana taxonomy. Kew Bull. 14: 198-212.
72. Simmonds, N.W. 1962. The evolution of the bananas. London: Longman.
73. Simmonds, N.W. & Weatherup, S.T.C. 1990. Numerical taxonomy of the wild bananas (Musa). New Phytol. 115: 567-571.
74. Stanford, A.M. Harden, R. & Parks, C.R. 2000. Phylogeny and biogeography of Juglans (Juglandaceae) based on matK and ITS sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 872-882.
75. Stevenson, D.J.W., Davis, J.I., Freudenstein, J.V., Hardy, C.R., Simmons, M.P. & Specht, C.D. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of the monocotyledons based on morphological and molecular character sets, with comments on the placement of Acorus and Hudatellaceae. Pp. 17-24 in: Wilson, K.I. & Morrison, D.A. (eds.), Monocots: Systematics and evolution. Melbourne: CSIRO.
76. Swofford, D.L. 2000. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. CD-ROM. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
77. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1105-1109.
78. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
79. Tomlinson, P.B. 1962. Phylogeny of the Scitamineae: Morphological and anatomical considerations. Evolution 16: 192-213.
80. Ude, G., Pillay, M., Nwakanma, D. & Tenkouano, A. 2002. Analysis of genetic diversity and sectional relationships in Musa using AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 1239-1245.
81. White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322 in: Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J. & White, T.J. (eds.), PCR Protocols: A guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press.
82. Wong, C., Kiew, R., Agent, G., Set, O., Lee, S.K. & Gan, Y.Y. 2002. Assessment of validity of sections in Musa (Musaceae) using AFLP. Ann. Bot. 90: 231-238.
83. Wu, D.-L. & Kress, W.J. 2001. Musaceae. Pp. 314-318 in: Wu, C.Y. & Raven, P.H. (eds.), Flora of China, vol. 24. Beijing: Science Press; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
84. Zomlefer, W.B., Williams, N.H., Whitten, W.M. & Judd, W.S. 2001. Generic circumscription and relationships in the tribe Melanthieae (Liliales, Melanthiaceae), with emphasis on Zigadenus: Evidence from ITS and trnL-F sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 1657-1669.