Do perceptual asymmetries differ in peripersonal and extrapersonal space?

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 210-214

  Thomas, Nicole A ^a   Elias, Lorin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Far space; Lateral biases; Laterality; Near space; Pseudoneglect; Spatial attention; Visual field differences

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; GROUP DYNAMICS; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PERSONAL SPACE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77149135594     PISSN: 13556177     EISSN: 14697661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S135561770999097X     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barrett, A.M., Crosson, B., Crucian, G.P., & Heilman, K.M. (2000). Horizontal line bisections in upper and lower body space. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 455-459.
2. Bjoertomt, O., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2002). Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain, 125, 2012-2022.
3. Bowers, D., & Heilman, K.M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18, 491-498.
4. Brodie, E.E., & Pettigrew, L.E.L. (1996). Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction. Neuropsychologia, 34, 467-470.
5. Chokron, S., Bartolomeo, P., Perenin, M., Helft, G., & Imbert, M. (1998). Scanning direction and line bisection: A study of normal subjects and unilateral neglect patients with opposite reading habits. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 173-178.
6. Dellatolas, G., Vanluchene, J., & Coutin, T. (1996). Visual and motor components in simple line bisection: An investigation in normal adults. Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 49-56.
7. Diekamp, B., Regolin, L., Güntürkün, O., & Vallortigara, G. (2005). A left-sided visuospatial bias in birds. Current Biology, 15, R372-R373.
8. Elias, L.J., Bryden, M.P., & Bulman-Fleming, M.B. (1998). Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuropsychologia, 36, 37-43.
9. Garza, J.P., Eslinger, P.J., & Barrett, A.M. (2008). Perceptualattentional and motor intentional bias in near and far space. Brain and Cognition, 68, 9-14.
10. Halligan, P.W., & Marshall, J.C. (1991). Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350, 498-500.
11. Heilman, K., & Valenstein, E. (1979). Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5, 166-170.
12. Keller, I., Schindler, I., Kerkhoff, G., von Rosen, F., & Golz, D. (2005). Visuospatial neglect in near and far space: Dissociation between line bisection and letter cancellation. Neuropsychologia, 43, 724-731.
13. Kinsbourne, M. (1970). The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica, 3, 193 - 201.
14. Krupp, D.B., Robinson, B.M., & Elias, L.J. (in press). Free-viewing perceptual asymmetry for distance judgments: Objects in right hemispace are closer than they appear. International Journal of Neuroscience.
15. Longo, M.R., & Lourenco, S.F. (2006). On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia, 44, 977-981.
16. Luh, K.E. (1995). Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: What you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology, 9, 435-448.
17. Manning, L., Halligan, P.W., & Marshall, J.C. (1990). Individual variation in line bisection: A study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 7, 647-655.
18. McCourt, M.E., & Garlinghouse, M. (2000). Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: Pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Cortex, 36, 715-731.
19. McCourt, M.E., & Jewell, G. (1999). Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 37, 843-855.
20. Nicholls, M.E.R., Bradshaw, J.L., & Mattingley, J.B. (1999). Freeviewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size. Neuropsychologia, 37, 307-314.
21. Nicholls, M.E.R., & Roberts, G.R. (2002). Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases? Cortex, 38, 113-136.
22. Previc, F.H. (1990). Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 519-575.
23. Regolin, L. (2006). The case of the line-bisection: When both humans and chickens wander left. Cortex, 42, 101-103.
24. Varnava, A., McCarthy, M., & Beaumont, J.G. (2002). Line bisection in normal adults: Direction of attentional bias for near and far space. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1372-1378.
25. Weiss, P.H., Marshall, J.C., Wunderlich, G., Tellmann, L., Halligan, P.W., Freund, H., et al. (2000). Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: A physiological basis for clinical dissociations . Brain, 123, 2531-2541.
26. Wilkinson, D., & Halligan, P. (2003). The effects of stimulus size on bisection judgements in near and far space. Visual Cognition, 10, 319-340.